Peace QCDN

And fag is just another word for cigarette so I don't know why that guy up on Belmont got so offended. The reason is context.
 
Chasym said:
i fail to see how me abbreviating emotional as so offensive. I cant say people are getting emotional over nothing? whining, emo, emotional. same thing really. Im not just makin stuff up, im stating the obvious.
so no one cares what im tired of seeing, No one cares you dont like the rules. its a two way street here. i never once used the words "shut up". i simply said theres a place for all this. and its not here.

This is where you are wrong, had you read the thread you'd notice Sculli happens to care what everyone thinks about the rules, not just me. Had you read the thread you'd know i actually liked the idea but not how it was gone about being implimented. Had you read the thread, or the policy thread recently mentioned in the QCDN newsletter you'dve noticed i've made suggestions on how to go about making things better around here. Had you read the thread you'd realize that what you think is 'stating the obvious' and how you went about it is no longer tolerated around here with a vengeance.

If not here when asked for input then where?

When you're a mod or administrator of this site ... or by some fluke can speak for them you have a valid point. Until such time, read the thread, learn how to make a rational interjection of logic, and know your place when entering a talk of this nature.
 
i personally dont live in a country where fag means cigarette. and i didnt use fag. Whats your definition of emo? because if i ask anyone it means emotional to them. Thats how i define it, so whats the difference? i didnt use it out of context.
 
And at page 23 of the 23rd thread about this, the whiners still haven't put their money where their mouths are and left.
Simply amazing, really.

You don't put what another user wrote in your sig against their will, because there is context, and that is harassment. Period. If you don't get that, you don't belong on a forum. You don't belong on a forum if you don't get that. Read: get lost if you don't get that.
 
Peregrine said:
And at page 23 of the 23rd thread about this, the whiners still haven't put their money where their mouths are and left.
Simply amazing, really.

You don't put what another user wrote in your sig against their will, because there is context, and that is harassment. Period. If you don't get that, you don't belong on a forum. You don't belong on a forum if you don't get that. Read: get lost if you don't get that.

You're one to talk. You've done the exact same thing numerous times most notably with skaw. This was not out of context, this was not harrassment. Or at least it wouldn't have been if shaid had a sense of humor about saying dumb shit like the rest of us do on occasion. Happens to the best of us, grow a backbone.

Read: Sculli asked for an open mic on the issue, invited the "whinning" (read: INPUT) numerous times now, if you can't get that see your way out of the conversation as you've had nothing to offer anyway, not that we're all not used to that from you which is why i'd assume you have yet to get deleted for the same remarks chasym made with just a little more intelligence behind them.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top