- Joined
- Aug 10, 2004
- Messages
- 10,285
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Sweden
- Nation Banner

- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Fenrir
- Linkshell
- Avaritas
- FFXIV
- Uzor
But me calling you stupid would be immature... why? Are you saying that only I am able to immature by calling someone stupid, while you have an immature immunity? Because that's what it sounds like from your phrase. Please do correct me if I am wrong.Where to start... calling you stupid doesn't make me immature if your actions lead me to believe you are stupid...there, I judged you on your actions, just as you requested.
Because that is where our opinions differ. It is my opinion that you can form your own opinion about a person without being said person. You don't have to know everything about a person to form an opinion about them. Humans are very shallow; I'm smart enough to realize that I, too, am a human, and is thus shallow. We always form opininions about people from what information we have available to us. You, too, have an opinion about him - it just happens to be different than mine. Your opinion is that you can't judge him based on him committing suicide, because you can't know what he's going through. You feel I should be more compassionate about his situation. I feel that you can judge him based on his action. My opinion is that it is horrible what he had to endure in life, but I also feel that whatever he went trough is no reason to end your own life and make those around him suffer. I feel it is a very selfish and weak decision. It all boild down to our views on; You seem to believe suicide is justified in certain situations - whereas I feel it is always wrong and selfish. It isn't because I lack compassion, it's because my compassion lies with the living. I feel no need to feel compassionate for those that are dead, I think it is better to feel compassion for those alive. If people die in a plane crash, I don't feel sorry for those that died, I feel sorry for those left behind. I feel compassion for what he went through, not for his death - his death was uneccesary, as well as a choice he himself actively made. As such, I don't feel it neccesary to be compassionate for his death, only for those he left behind. As such, his choice was a selfish one, as his action result in uneccesary suffering for others. It is a crime towards them - not himself.I'm merely trying to work out why you have the opinion you do, when the whole basis of my argument is that you cannot judge, even though you seem to think you can, because you don't know what he was going through.
It's a game of "what if's", and that game can never be won or accurately foretold, as I'd likely have different views and opinions then than I do now. It is simply too many variables to take in to consideration to give an accurate answer. However, no, I don't think I would be fearful. I can't say for sure as I've never experienced gettign raped when I was 4. Based on my current views, opinions, feelings and morals, though, I'm sure it would affect me for the rest of my life, but I don't think I would be fearful. I would certainly be depressed and shocked, but I respect and trust my parents enough to share what happened with them so that they could help me through it. But I do not think I would be fearful, no. But again, I can't say for sure.We're not going to agree, that is clear, but I feel the need to point out this last part.
There is a very big difference between having an opinion (which everybody does) and judging someone like this guy. To judge and to think are, again, different. I don't understand why you continue to call him a coward even when you comprehend my point that you don't know what he went through.
Coward = someone who faces difficulty without courage.
Courage = someone who faces difficulty with fear.
Do you think you would be fearful, as he was, if you had endured what he had? If you do, then you would be a coward in that situation too. You can say what he did was wrong, I won't argue that, because that part is an opinion. To call him a coward is unnecessary and, still, not true. "The coward's way out" is a cliche, with very little in the way of substance to back it up.
Additionally, I hardly think it lacks substance. He's courageous as long as he endures it, but the moment he stops believing in himself and lose hope - eventually leading to suicide - he becomes a coward. He then faces, as you state it, difficulty without courage. It is why he commits suicide; because he lacks the courage to go on. Someone who goes through something like that and choose to fight; that choose to live on and better their life, they deserve all the respect in the world for their courage. Someone that chooses to end their life though, does not. They deserve respect for the time they chose to live, but not for the act itself - because the act itself (that is, suicide) is a sign of weakness; not strength. It is a sign they no longer has the courage to live on. Therefor, it is the coward's way out.
Last edited: