9/11 staged by the US evidence video

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shaunessy said:
Fuck AIM. If you seriously want the file, then get MSN and upgrade to 7.5 atleast. Then I could send you the file no problem and you could do what you want with it.
Click to expand...
eh, i dont like msn, i dont know anyone that uses it everyone i know is on aim :/
 
Yeah but I hate AIM and so do all of my friends. Seems to be a personal prefrance. Oh well though, I'm not going to get AIM just to send you a file. If you really want it get MSN messenger 7.5 and add me. If not oh well I really don't care.
 
Chasym said:
eh, i dont like msn, i dont know anyone that uses it everyone i know is on aim :/
Click to expand...
Shaunessy said:
Yeah but I hate AIM and so do all of my friends. Seems to be a personal prefrance. Oh well though, I'm not going to get AIM just to send you a file. If you really want it get MSN messenger 7.5 and add me. If not oh well I really don't care.
Click to expand...
I feel privileged to be audience to this coming together of two great minds. I sense that the resolution to this enigmatic "mystery" is well at hand. Bravo.


T_T
 
Last edited:
Shaunessy said:
Yeah but I hate AIM and so do all of my friends. Seems to be a personal prefrance. Oh well though, I'm not going to get AIM just to send you a file. If you really want it get MSN messenger 7.5 and add me. If not oh well I really don't care.
Click to expand...
lol same thing i meant without sayin it, dont wanna download it just to get the file. whats it called maybe i can find it somewhere
 
Winklewil said:
I feel privileged to be audience to this coming together of two great minds. I sense that the resolution to this enigmatic "mystery" is well at hand. Bravo.


T_T
Click to expand...
so we have two different opinions of a messenger? we are talking about ways to get me a file that deals with the topic.
i fail to see how that would be flame material unless your just lookin to start something.
 
Chasym said:
umm wtf...how is this relevant at all.
youve had a lil too much...
Click to expand...
No, the problem is I left this page open and my friends thought it would be funny to post that while I was elsewhere drinking beer. So yeah now you know a little about the type of people I hang out with.
 
Chas, read the links Rones posted please...
 
Tagrineth said:
Chas, read the links Rones posted please...
Click to expand...
i did, they contradict, one says his first info was wrong that it was a missle possibly disguised to look like plane, then on another one it says it was certainly a plane...seems like everything i read differs somehow
 
read over the link i put up. it has scientific rebuttles to most of tthe things mentioned in the vid
 
masterorion said:
read over the link i put up. it has scientific rebuttles to most of tthe things mentioned in the vid
Click to expand...
yeah rones posted that link too, but im the kind of person who doesnt always go for the scientific explanation. Not saying its not right or that its wrong, but science tries to find an explanation to debunk anything, ghosts, aliens,why MJ touches little boys.
i dont believe science has an explanation for everything and for me, some of the things in this case is one of those times.
 
Chasym said:
i did, they contradict, one says his first info was wrong that it was a missle possibly disguised to look like plane, then on another one it says it was certainly a plane...seems like everything i read differs somehow
Click to expand...
Where are you getting that from? :shok: Are you mixing up the conspiracy allegations with the debunking part? Of course it was a plane.
masterorion said:
read over the link i put up. it has scientific rebuttles to most of tthe things mentioned in the vid
Click to expand...
I had already posted that link. It was the 2nd source I provided.
i dont believe science has an explanation for everything and for me, some of the things in this case is one of those times.
Click to expand...
When you are arguing the facts of what happened in a situation, science takes priority over conspiracy theories always.
 
Last edited:
Rones said:
Where are you getting that from? :shok: Are you mixing up the conspiracy allegations with the debunking part? Of course it was a plane.
Click to expand...

Are you sure it was a plane? I mean there are many theories and none of them explain how a plane would make such a small hole. Also where was all the baggage, parts of plane, and fire from the amount of fuel that the plane "supposedly" had go to? I mean the fire from the fuel in the towers "supposedly" melted the structure so much that the buildings collapsed under their own weight, yet the pentegon lawn was barly scorched, and there were books, with no burned pages, in the open of the "collision area". What happened to those videos from the Gas Station across the street that looked at the pentagon? Sure some people say,"Well it was vaporized in the impact" Well I say how can that be if the same amount of fuel was in the planes that brought down the twin towers. Boom, boom, boom ,boom, boom, boom, boom, boom........ever hear that before? Those are the words of firefighters that were there on 9/11 and said it sounded more like a planned destruction than an unfortunate mishap. Think about it.
 
I would suggest skipping over that one. He counterdicts himself and seems pretty confused. Most of the links on that first page are pretty good. That is not one of them though. If you are unsure of whether it was a plane that hit, you can check the other numerous sources to weed out the misinformation that slips through.

Edit for Shaun
Was a plane.
Still a plane.
Definitly a plane.
Not scientific, but gives lots of info from a reliable source.
Still was a plane.
Interesting read.
1. If it was not American Airlines flight 77 that hit the Pentagon, then where is the airplane and the 64 people who were aboard?
None of the conspiracy sites answers that question. Few of them even ask it.

2. If it was not American Airlines flight 77, then why do they have evidence of the bodies of known crew, passengers, and hijackers?
C. Christopher Kelley of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology says that the effort to identify bodies that ended on November 16, 2001, identified all but one of the victims of flight 77.

3. In response to the question of "Where is the Boeing," the answer is "in pieces."
There was plenty of evidence of the airplane at the site including debris from the plane, as mentioned above, the remains of the passengers, and the cockpit data and voice recorders. Associated Press Military Writer Robert Burns reported on September 13,2001, that members of congress who had visited the Pentagon crash site were told by rescue officials that much of the fuselage of the Boeing 757 remained intact inside the damaged Pentagon.

4. Radar tracked the plane toward the Pentagon.
Much has been made on some of the conspiracy sites that the transponder in the cockpit was turned off by the hijackers so it isn't clear what happened to the plane after that. The founder of TruthOrFiction.com, Rich Buhler, is a licensed commercial pilot and says the transponder being turned off doesn't mean the plane can no longer be seen on radar. The transponder is a device that not only makes the airplane more visible on a radar screen, but also gives the radar controller other information such as the altitude, speed, and sometimes the identity of the airliner. If the transponder is turned off, radar controllers can usually still see what is called the "primary target." That means there is a blip on the radar screen showing the location. According to www.airdisaster.com, flight 77's transponder was turned off shortly after departure from Dulles airport near Washington DC, but radar controllers could see the primary target flying directly toward the White House. Then the plane was seen to veer away from the White House and head for the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

Also where was all the baggage, parts of plane, and fire from the amount of fuel that the plane "supposedly" had go to?
Click to expand...
Baggage was found along with passenger remains. The fire from the fuel burned for days. Unlike the WTC's though, firecrews could reach this one and apply some control.
 
Last edited:
Shaunessy said:
Are you sure it was a plane? I mean there are many theories and none of them explain how a plane would make such a small hole. Also where was all the baggage, parts of plane, and fire from the amount of fuel that the plane "supposedly" had go to? I mean the fire from the fuel in the towers "supposedly" melted the structure so much that the buildings collapsed under their own weight, yet the pentegon lawn was barly scorched, and there were books, with no burned pages, in the open of the "collision area". What happened to those videos from the Gas Station across the street that looked at the pentagon? Sure some people say,"Well it was vaporized in the impact" Well I say how can that be if the same amount of fuel was in the planes that brought down the twin towers. Boom, boom, boom ,boom, boom, boom, boom, boom........ever hear that before? Those are the words of firefighters that were there on 9/11 and said it sounded more like a planned destruction than an unfortunate mishap. Think about it.
Click to expand...

the link that myself and apparently rones posted, debunks all of those situations. and the melting structure, if you think about it and, what happens to something when it gets hot.(not melting point hot, but close to it?) it tends to soften.

the "no burnt pages in the books" doesnt really stand up either. if a building just straight blows up, all contents in it are ejected out ward at a high velocity. it doesnt have time to burn at a constant flame because the object is in motion.

as far as the "boom boom boom", when one floor goes, it collapses onto the one below it, thus causing a enough downforce to cause the next floor to go, and so on and so on. when those floors hit each other, they are going to cause a boom noise from large slabs of material landing on each other.
 
Ok, so obviously I need to get this video I have out. The only problem is it's a 100+ MB file and I don't want to post it because that requires to much work and setting up accounts in places that I don't want to set accpunts up in. The pages of the book in the pentagon were untouched. The Pcs on desks were untouched. does that sound like a plane "smashing" into a building? Can anyone here post pics of the plane smashing into the pentagon? No because all video evidence was confiscated by the secret servive and the FBI, minutes after the event. Not hours, MINUTES. How often does a government agency work that fast?
 
Shaunessy said:
Ok, so obviously I need to get this video I have out. The only problem is it's a 100+ MB file and I don't want to post it because that requires to much work and setting up accounts in places that I don't want to set accpunts up in. The pages of the book in the pentagon were untouched. The Pcs on desks were untouched. does that sound like a plane "smashing" into a building? Can anyone here post pics of the plane smashing into the pentagon? No because all video evidence was confiscated by the secret servive and the FBI, minutes after the event. Not hours, MINUTES. How often does a government agency work that fast?
Click to expand...

So are you suggesting that a plane mysteriously vanished, a missile hit the side of the pentagon, and then someone magically put the remains of all but one passenger of the plane, as well as a lot of luggage, into the pentagon wreckage?

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm Knock yourself out.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top