Firestreak said:
They don't have to be melted... they just have to weakened enough that they'll fail to support the weight of the floors above them. It's been said over and over again. Don't you think it would make you look less retarded to read some of the explanation of the phenomena rather than show how much of a shitty community college you go to?
God damn these people are making a great argument for eugenics.
First off, your just being a dickhead, flat out, and secondly, no, not possible. Theres absolutely no way, especially with the 2nd tower, that it could have happened that way. That plane clipped the corner of the buidling, theres no way that fire could have spread, and caused enough damage in around an hr to cause the collapse of that entire building ESPECIALLY considering those buildings were built with the intent to withstand hurricanes and other disasters, so even if the fires caused the steel girters to weaken and fail, the building itself wouldn't have failed, especially in the manner that it did, that was an implosion, you dumbass. Also, the buldings cores were the strongest parts of them, they were struck above the cores, that would have stopped the complete destruction of the towers. And you mean to tell me that throughout history buildings have withstood much worse and not collapsed but the 2 towers that have been described as nearly indesructible, were brought down by that? Theres was a tornado not too long ago where I live from what I have been told by friends and family alike, it directly hit a bank of america tower, that bulding DID NOT COLLAPSE! it was refinished into a tower of condos, now if this normal local tower can withstand a direct hit from a tornado, why couldnt these towers withstand those planes? Now, I will say this, the first tower, yes it is possible that the hit from the plane could have caused enough damage to cause the integrity to be compramised, but it wouldn't have failed as a whole, the second tower, could not have been compramised enough from the plane clipping it to cause that.
With me so far? now lets examine this in more detail. the second tower was clipped on the corner of the building, so theoretically, according to the laws of physics, when that tower went down, by all means the top should have collapsed and fell to the side, instead it fell directly down like the first one did afterwards. Now, go ahead and argue, im sure you will find some way to, but theres one thing for certain, I did not post intending on starting a fucking war, and you had to be an asshole and start one anyways, so now, just to show you what a fucking moron you are, I will go ahead and stay up arguing with you, researching everything I can/have to to prove to you that THERE IS NO WAY THOSE TOWERS COLLAPSED BECAUSE OF THOSE PLANES!:rtfm: