- Joined
- Nov 12, 2004
- Messages
- 1,490
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Kansas
- Nation Banner

- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- FFXIV
- Bustaballs
Firestreak said:Right, brings up all the information that's out there, no matter how unreliable the source and if it's been retracted or not. Then you guys mine it for whatever data you can find to justify the position you've already taken. The only thing that is even possible is that the government "let it happen" when they could have moved to stop it, but to be honest, you really have to be an asshole to believe that.
Well apparently anyone that knows the truth is an asshole. It has been proven whether you decide to accept it or not. It has been on mainstream news a number of times. Quit being so willingly ignorant and actually do some research outside of Maddox who must be a physics genius trained by guru sages at PM and knew everything about everything that happened on 9/11 because he was a witness of everything.
Firestreak said:And by the way, there HAS been a commisson by experts into the truth behind the attacks. It's was called the 9/11 commission. Their major criticism was "failure of imagination" in that if Clinton and Bush had done a better job thinking up how the attacks could have happened then they could have possibly stopped them.
You didn't read my last post well enough and this part of the post proves your ignorance on the matter.
- The lead commisioner, Philip Zelikow, was in the NSC in Bush Sr.'s administration. He's a friend of Condi Rice, and he has many connections to the current administration. He was one of the only two allowed to have access to all of the documents during the investigation. He also had the final say on what went into the commision report.
- Only two of the commisioners were allowed access to all of the documents.
- There were many many testimonys that were completely ignored.
- People wern't put under oath.
- The president and vice president agreed to tesitfy only if they could do it together, it was private, and they would not be put under oath. Whenever someone questioned the president on this matter he avoided the answer. Permission for this was granted and he refused to speak about what happened to the press after the testimony.
- There many many many ommisions and distortions in the book. It said they didn't know who funded 9/11 and that it wasn't important when the media had some leads.
- It mentioned almost nothing about WTC7.
- It denies the existence of the 47~ core columns, claiming the towers' cores were "hollow steel shaft
The list goes on and on. Overall the book was just a part of the cover-up.
I now understand, more than ever, your extremely limited lack of knowledge on the subject and will stop from argueing with you any longer until you actually do some real research.
I'm sorry, but if someone can look at the collapse of WTC7 and not think it's strange then I don't want to try to have an intelligent conversation or debate about 9/11 with them.
That's all for me. If anyone is truely interested in actually using their brain and needs decent resources relating to 9/11 then send me a message.