Actually, Cub

Status
Not open for further replies.
Darkdante said:
Jo could have started a new thread with a link to the old.

Why not do that?

yeah true but he's new and Pup made a sticky announcement stateing:

Thread Necromancy - While I'm not a fan of it, it will not be locked IF IT IS RELEVANT TO THE TOPIC. Don't post in a topic that is months old just to say "Hello". If you want to bring something new to the topic, then by all means, go ahead, but make sure it's for a reason, users can see the dates of the posts, and it'll simply make you look like a fool for necroing something for no reason or to get a post count +1.

So by the rules, Jo did nothing wrong. Also if Cubs wanted Jo too do that he should have politely asked Jo too do that and then locked it. Can't expect new people too know these things off the bat.
 
Only n00bs don't know EVERYTHING right off the bat. Sheesh. Don't you know how uncool it is to be a n00b?! Oi. You act like we should assist them in growth and teach them new things to make them not n00bs. >.> Gosh. Quit trying to take our fuel away. We need -something- generic to complain about.
 
The Druw said:
Only n00bs don't know EVERYTHING right off the bat. Sheesh. Don't you know how uncool it is to be a n00b?! Oi. You act like we should assist them in growth and teach them new things to make them not n00bs. >.> Gosh. Quit trying to take our fuel away. We need -something- generic to complain about.

Noobs are people that refuse too learn and grow. People that pull stupid things for their own amusement.

Newbs are people that are just simply starting out in something for the first time. Naturally they will not know everything and will need help.

Really I think Cubs may have made a mistake or a misscomunication took place. I am just looking at this from Jo's standpoint. He may have read Pup's announcement or not. I read it at top and too me it looks like Jo did nothing wrong. If Cubs wants his rules implied then he needs too go talk too Pup and have the rules rewritten where Thread Necromancy is not allowed period. Which Cubs' old sticky used too say but that has been taken down. So anyone new here has not seen that and is not aware of it. If I was too come here and see an old flame with my name on it then I would have done the same which it would have been directed at me.

Too me and the way you wrote that I think you are all for punishing people for not knowing or not doing things your way. No where did it say thread necromancy is not allowed at all under any circumstances. So Jo is not a noob for this. He just did not do this Cubs' way. Just put yourself in the other guy's shoes and look at it from his eyes.
 
Bottom line is Thread Necormacy is not tolerated here unless you have good reason, especialy when your talking months old. What your doing is makin everyone read 10 pages of year old threads time and time again, we got 30 page threads here to read that pop up in 1 day. With that, you don't really wanna see everyone pop up the dead 30 page threads just because you wernt here at the time.

He could have started his own flame with all the witty comebacks and a link to an old thread to let us decide if we want to scroll through that stuff or not.

We like our "new" crap at the top of our boards not last years "old news".
 
Darkdante said:
Bottom line is Thread Necormacy is not tolerated here unless you have good reason, especialy when your talking months old. What your doing is makin everyone read 10 pages of year old threads time and time again, we got 30 page threads here to read that pop up in 1 day. With that, you don't really wanna see everyone pop up the dead 30 page threads just because you wernt here at the time.

He could have started his own flame with all the witty comebacks and a link to an old thread to let us decide if we want to scroll through that stuff or not.

We like our "new" crap at the top of our boards not last years "old news".

Then the rules should not allow Thread Necormacy at all under any circumstances. Cubs' old sticky should have been left in place. I am just saying that they need too make shit clear in the rules and decided who is running what. Thats my complaint. If Cubs is going too run this his way then leave his original rules up there.
 
Ya your right.

But if you had to write out every single thing you can do and cannot do on this board like this.....

- don't press submit more than once, especially during the slow hours
- no thread necormacy
- no spamming
- no racist jokes
- use paragraphs so you don't look like a moron
yada yada yada

Whos gonna read and remember all that? This is the reason like in real life you have police officers, here we have a moderator. To keep things clean, tidy, and well behaved. You don't have a law stating you can't run across the street naked, but we do have a police officer enforcing laws that it may or may not cover, like here our moderator handels that. True he wont be right ALL THE TIME but at least you got somebody here keeping control and the peace.

Because no matter how many rules you make if nobody enforces them rules mean nothing.

He aint hitler, he's not a saint, But I think he's doing a damn fine job.

Just my 2 cents.
 
btw: he can still start up an arguement again locking a thread is not stopping him from doing it. All its doing is keeping an "old" thread from the top.
 
Jo said:
sure, i got more change in my poket than you have in IQ..



:P


Considering the highest possible IQ, and that Cubs would be above average, I'd still say you're broke as fuck. Congrats on having a lot of change though.
 
DodgeRoadRage said:
I think Jo has a right too say something under the old threads that are directed too him. Cubs, sorry man but I think you and Pup may have had a misscommunication somewhere. You are doing a great job moding and everything but in this case I think your in the wrong. That or Pup must have posted that recently after this topic was made. Even the, Start nameing names thread is old but I think it was meant too be active still. Personally not a fan of naming names cause that stuff comes back too haunt you sooner or later.

It's a matter of content. If the thread were, say... a week old, the bump would have been fine with what he posted. The farther back a post is, the more you need to add to the thread to justify the necro. For a month, it would have needed a bit more. For SIX MONTHS+, he would have needed close to a best-selling novel to avoid a lock. He can still create a new topic and link to the locked ones - nobody's stopping him from doing that.

I'd love it if threads got autolocked after a month here, but I don't make those kind of decisions.
 
Ok I just have to laugh that the thing about Summerslam Cubs... based on some of your Sigs I got that you liked wrestling but that made me smile :)

I am just sad HBK lost... sorry my two cents
 
CubsWoo said:
DodgeRoadRage said:
I think Jo has a right too say something under the old threads that are directed too him. Cubs, sorry man but I think you and Pup may have had a misscommunication somewhere. You are doing a great job moding and everything but in this case I think your in the wrong. That or Pup must have posted that recently after this topic was made. Even the, Start nameing names thread is old but I think it was meant too be active still. Personally not a fan of naming names cause that stuff comes back too haunt you sooner or later.

It's a matter of content. If the thread were, say... a week old, the bump would have been fine with what he posted. The farther back a post is, the more you need to add to the thread to justify the necro. For a month, it would have needed a bit more. For SIX MONTHS+, he would have needed close to a best-selling novel to avoid a lock. He can still create a new topic and link to the locked ones - nobody's stopping him from doing that.

I'd love it if threads got autolocked after a month here, but I don't make those kind of decisions.

Yeah I see your point. I know Jo ingame and he has helped out our linkshell several times so I thought I might try too explain things from looking from his point of view.
 
Holy shit... Just wow... 9+ months latter and this is the response... :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Fellina said:
It's true that all we do is talk shit here. But it's Cubs' job to keep the 6-month old turds from floating back to to top of the midden.

Since you're obviously new here, I'll be nice, and let you know- go against Cubs, and you're in for a long, long road. He's not Unofficial Official President of teh Intarnets for nothing. :P



lol, retard.. :wink:


ecks, ya.. it is true.. i didnt know u as a shit talker when i joined your ls. it sux this is how i have to meet you. next timetry and be a bigboy and send ol` jophen a tell if he is doing something wrong. dont come crying to the internet.

p.s. i solo`ed levi prime and shiva prime so far as rdm/nin.. LOL

whos my bitch, lets see your drk do that :p
 
45 rdm/nin w/o dispel.. do you need it? LOL

see`yall again next month :p
 
yuo is teh funney niternet man
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top