lol
Elvaan RNG's are gimped because they have 11 less AGI than a Mithra at 75? Wow.. I didn't know 11 AGI (Yet 8 more STR) somehow makes an Elvaan gimped. I could've sworn there was more than 35-40 possible points of AGI to add to your base @ 75, as well as over 95 points of Ranged Accuracy. But 11 points of AGI makes or breaks Elvaan Rangers I guess. Poor guys.
Is it the ideal race for ranger? The answer is no. Some of the hard-core gamers will pass you up just based upon your race.
Jufa, I hope you take the advice of somebody who's played RNG all the way through (Me and Syn), over that of somebody who hasn't. Ranger is a great job in the respect that every race is basically identical in terms of accuracy because of the plethora of equipment we have at our disposal throughout the -entire- game (It's even easier with the Noct +1 equipment added with CoP). The slight AGI difference (5-12 points of AGI is slight) between Taru/Hume/Elvaan/Galka/Mithra doesn't make enough difference to notice accuracy discrepencies between them. And when I say "Notice accuracy discrepencies", I'm referring to seeing one hitting 85-95%, vs the other hitting 60-70%. If you notice a Mithra RNG hitting *noticably* more often than an Elvaan, the reason isn't because of race. It's because of either: Equipment, level difference, or a combination of both.
I hope this sheds some light on the subject.
Oh, and end-game, Elvaan RNG's are (IMO) the best Race for Ranger, due to the equipment you acquire at 75 (If you're lucky). Seiryu's Kote gives AGI+15 which negates any accuracy differences between any race (At 75, I as a Hume, hit over 90% on EXP mobs, and 85-90% with Dual Prelude on Gods). End-game, accuracy isn't what rangers want. It's Ranged Attack and STR equipment. We don't need accuracy anymore, we already have enough of it. We want to up our damage. This is why I'm kicking myself for not grabbing the Bushinomimi over the Suppanomimi after Divine Might.
