Avatar and Porn Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rappa said:
Well, where does the moral curtain lie for qcdn? Obviously no one knows since our admin doesn't do shit here. So why are we flaming a moderator who chose to listen to people who were offended and take some action?

I think we've since departed from blaming the moderator. Just what I thought, though, lol. I dunno, but if we take action based on the complaints of a portion of the population, we'll be deleting posts constantly because they're offensive, or some relateable offense.
 
lol, this thread is funny. I agree that the avatars with tits is getting over the top. I read this site from work and if my boss happens to walk by, and see's those, he'll think i'm looking at porn(from a distance some of those pix could be confused with full nudity).

I'm like most other guys in the sense that I enjoy boobs, but not everyone one this board is "like most other guys" so lets have some respect ppl and drop the soft porn avatars.

Again just goes to show that Reeve could really careless about this site, otherwise you'd think he'd be here seeing whats going on. Thanks Alyada, you did the right thing.

Edit: I can't type ><
 
Last edited:
As Rappa said, the admin doesn't do much. You kids won't be deleting your own tittie posts.
 
I think everything could be solved by having an admin that gave a shit, lol. We need some actual guidelines here so people don't take it out on the mods that basically have to flip a coin to decide which half of qcdn is going to shit on them.
 
If you wanna do it, ain't nobody gonna stop ya. Laws and rules don't affect free will. Just, you examples of rape and of stealing TVs doesn't really apply...At all. If you were to come up with a more apples to apples example, it would seem so boring.

As if someone used soft porn avatars as an example to back up their point. "But yeah I like using soft porn avatars cuz I like titties and da butt, and it's wut I like so there."

In the defense of Shyrra, I do believe this board is for fun. At least partly. Where lines need to be drawn should not be influenced by poor analogies. That is the only point I want to make, since it would seem we will be seeing some changes.


On one hand, no, you're not wrong. On the other, you're not right.
Hence, poor analogy.
Itsk
 
Zephayra said:
Well, I didn't mean all the girls putting bare-chested men as their avaters, I meant close ups of their crotches, as a man walking around with no shirt on isn't considered indecent exposure when women more or less, unless they're on a nudist resort or in a place where toplessness is legal, would be restricted from doing that.

I wasn't saying avaters were porn, but they were certainly suggestive, am I right? It's not just a woman standing there, but instead, they're trying to be arousing in the picture. However, I could be wrong. I'm not a man, and thus I don't know what you would consider arousing.

this is the internet. people from different cultures will be offended by different things. While most people on this site are from the U.S., where boobs in public are wrongfully outlawed, others are from around the world would not share this opinion. In fact i would go as far to say that to some people a bare chested woman is as non offensive as a bare chested man. Seriously, they are just tits, who cares.
 
Rappa said:
I think everything could be solved by having an admin that gave a shit, lol. We need some actual guidelines here so people don't take it out on the mods that basically have to flip a coin to decide which half of qcdn is going to shit on them.

I certainly agree with you on this point lol. Poor Aly gets bitched at far more than he deserves, he does a good job, it's just not possible to please everyone.
 
Rappa said:
Well, where does the moral curtain lie for qcdn? Obviously no one knows since our admin doesn't do shit here. So why are we flaming a moderator who chose to listen to people who were offended and take some action?


That, I don't know. I don't think Alyada deserves a FB post for this.
 
Rappa said:
I think everything could be solved by having an admin that gave a shit, lol. We need some actual guidelines here so people don't take it out on the mods that basically have to flip a coin to decide which half of qcdn is going to shit on them.

Not again...

The guidelines and rules are there. Plain as the spartan in your avatar.

What this place needs is an admin/staff that doesn't give a shit to start busting heads for infractions no matter who they come from.

Wouldn't hurt to tell the policy carebears to go take a flying fucking leap either.

Seeing as how that's prolly not going to happen so much as we're going to wind up repeating the mistakes of the board in the past i'ma go get some chicken and waffles.
 
Rappa said:
Hey, I hear that raping girls is tons of fun! Who cares if it's offensive as long as I get enjoyment out of doing it, right?
wow, Rappa, taking blowing shit out of proportion to new levels since...

But seriously, there's a difference between offending and hurting. That's like saying making a joke about an ethnicity is the same as a hate crime. A black co-worker of mine made all sorts of black jokes, lots of them involved the black guy dying. you're practically saying they're no difference between telling the joke and killing a black guy.
 
Blackchaoshero said:
wow, Rappa, taking blowing shit out of proportion to new levels since...

Way to not read the rest of the discussion after that, lol
 
Thread should of been locked at the OP, it was a worthless thread. But since the mods don't even pay attention to the rules, I made one just like it.
 
I don't think it's fun when people can't view the site from work/school on their free time in fear of having their privalages revoked.

"But sir, it didn't actually show the nipple" Give me a break

image.php


image.php


I don't care if you're showing coconuts or sausages they're both going to get some good peeps into a lot of trouble.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top