- Joined
- Jul 17, 2005
- Messages
- 1,031
- Age
- 40
- Location
- Chicago
- Nation Banner

- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- FFXIV
- Darklion
Tyrath said:What did you fix exactly? Looks like the same quote >.>
He fixed his avatar...
Tyrath said:What did you fix exactly? Looks like the same quote >.>
Shyrra said:No, I understand that... She's saying she likes viewing SOME avatars, but not the ones that were deemed inappropriate. So then to have me have to remove my avatar so she could view the avatars, says her rights are more valuable then mine. See my point?
Sirelrohir said:Fixed!
Kerowynn said:They are! lol
I don't see anything wrong with your current avatar Shy, but some of them were over the line. I think the mods just want to try to enforce equally so they are probably deleting stuff that they wouldn't normally delete.
Shyrra said:No, I understand that... She's saying she likes viewing SOME avatars, but not the ones that were deemed inappropriate. So then to have me have to remove my avatar so she could view the avatars, says her rights are more valuable then mine. See my point?
Kerowynn said:He fixed the avatar...um sort of. lol
Shyrra said:/smack.
I don't see how Sanoske's was over the line, she was clothed. Just bent over a table.
Kerowynn said:Yeah but a bunch of people did cross the line. If the mods had only removed a couple of the worst avatars people would be bitching that their avatar was removed while other's got to stay. Either way people will bitch lol.
Darklion said:We have to see if Kero allows this.
I love you MirosMiros said:Okay kiddos, here's the scoop
There were about 3 or 4 avatars that were just way over the line. Nipples nearly poking the users eyes out, breasts exposed, only covered up by a hand, or pressing against another femmes body. That shit is softcore porn ladies and gents.
I have nothing wrong with Shyrra's right now. Probably most of you people arguing haven't really seen the ones we made them take down. But of course everyone has to see this as OMFG THEY'RE TRYING TO SILENCE ME! No, but we don't need softcore porn.
Miros said:Okay kiddos, here's the scoop
There were about 3 or 4 avatars that were just way over the line. Nipples nearly poking the users eyes out, breasts exposed, only covered up by a hand, or pressing against another femmes body. That shit is softcore porn ladies and gents.
I have nothing wrong with Shyrra's right now. Probably most of you people arguing haven't really seen the ones we made them take down. But of course everyone has to see this as OMFG THEY'RE TRYING TO SILENCE ME! No, but we don't need softcore porn.
Tyrath said:We got this. Old news. I think the point was that it was those 3 or 4, so what about the rest that were okay? Reminds me just a tad bit of Sculli. And why did someone try to remove Shyrra's current one.
Miros said:Well this was the basis of it. I haven't changed anyones avatars, and haven't PMed anyone either. I had nothing against Flys older ones, even Sansokes. And like I said before, if Westyles (sp) gets taken down I am going to rip shit.
Mishaela said:Off-topic but your AV reminds me of an episode of "Yu-Gi-Oh Abridged", personally.
"But I don't wanna be a furry!"
"Shut up and bend over."
Awesome. <3
But yeah I agree, someone needs to take a breath from their mod duties. Two or three of the avatars thus far had no reason to be removed.
Mishaela said:Off-topic but your AV reminds me of an episode of "Yu-Gi-Oh Abridged", personally.
"But I don't wanna be a furry!"
"Shut up and bend over."
Awesome. <3
But yeah I agree, someone needs to take a breath from their mod duties. Two or three of the avatars thus far had no reason to be removed.
Kerowynn said:I bet if people cool it on the really bad ones no one will care about the others.
Tenkax said:Have you ever worked in an office envornment?
something like your avatar is something that is no allowed in the corporate world. It is deemed as sexual harassment. We want QCDN to be browser freindly regardless of where you are browsing from, and avatars such as yours do not make it so.
Does having a Avatar make your post more intellegent or add to posts in anyway? No, I don't think so.
Maybe we can end this argument by getting rid of avatars for everyone, then this would be a pointless argument no?
Tenkax said:Have you ever worked in an office envornment?
something like your avatar is something that is no allowed in the corporate world. It is deemed as sexual harassment. We want QCDN to be browser freindly regardless of where you are browsing from, and avatars such as yours do not make it so.
Does having a Avatar make your post more intellegent or add to posts in anyway? No, I don't think so.
Maybe we can end this argument by getting rid of avatars for everyone, then this would be a pointless argument no?