Two Sandy Pussies for me please!
So Wexican! XD
Two Sandy Pussies for me please!
I'm wondering why the morons in red haven't moved the "Final Showdown" thread yet.
I remember one idiot in red, who just so happens to have posted in that very thread, locked a thread in GT because it wasn't FF related. Yet he allows that thread, which goes under the same rule as far as needing to be ff related to carry on.
I swear, people get absurdly stupid when given mod status...Hellstorm must be a mod on some sight we dont know about.
2) The Flameboard is to be used for FFXI-Game or forum related occurances/issues only. Anything else will be moved to its appropriate section. This includes Joke Threads.
Meeze has a point. If anything that thread is a joke thread and should be locked or moved... not be allowed to grow to 12 pages because hey, the mods find it funneh.
I'm wondering why the morons in red haven't moved the "Final Showdown" thread yet.
I remember one idiot in red, who just so happens to have posted in that very thread, locked a thread in GT because it wasn't FF related. Yet he allows that thread, which goes under the same rule as far as needing to be ff related to carry on.
I swear, people get absurdly stupid when given mod status...Hellstorm must be a mod on some sight we dont know about.
Since most of the people on this board have been going back on forth on the scrubs and house thing, I'd consider that a forum related occurance.
Since most of the people on this board have been going back on forth on the scrubs and house thing, I'd consider that a forum related occurrence.
Since most of the people on this board have been going back on forth on the scrubs and house thing, I'd consider that a forum related occurance.
So you believe it's a legitimate flame? It's a joke thread clearly - the topic creator was obviously being facetious. Would it not be better suited as an off-topic thread?
You don't like to follow all the rules... so why are you complaining that someone else isn't too?
Christ, lighten up. It's like you "idiots in navy blue" complaining about a ketchup packet in where the mustard is supposed to be.
You don't like to follow all the rules... so why are you complaining that someone else isn't too?
Christ, lighten up. It's like you "idiots in navy blue" complaining about a ketchup packet in where the mustard is supposed to be.
Pretty much.
Crossposted. The mods, as a whole, as a team, need to be fair and impartial, or stop pretending to be entirely.I do agree re-punishing people would be dumb, which is why we throw out examples of say necrosis doing worse, and such. The main point is that there is favoritism. If the mods go out and publicly say "yes, there's favoritism" then we can't argue with that, as this forum is a private one, but from everything I've heard and seen, the administration tries to treat the forum as if it was a "public" forum that promotes fairness in treatment.
If the administration says "We will perma ban cecilee because we don't like him, but we won't even talk to Daveman about it because we like him more", or "We will temp ban necrosis, and perma ban juvenile because we like necrosis better", then that would certainly shut everyone up.
But as long as the administration wants to give out an image of fairness and equaility, people will argue about situations such as this.
If I'm wrong in assuming that coming out as fair is a goal, then I'll obviously have no place to complain as being able to post on qcdn isn't a birth-right of a human being. If the administration want to ban every user with 3 vowels in their name, or have "ban day" where people are banned for any reason, or give differenet degrees of punishment for the same violation to different people then that's their right to, just can't claim to treat everyone equally without favoritism.
Except no one is saying to enforce *every* rule.
We are saying that the rules you do enforce, should be enforced equally to the entire user base, or stop pretending to be so fair and balanced.
If that's the case, then there are probably some faulty rules.I'm still waiting for the okay to start enforcing every rule that we have on these boards. Can't wait to see how quiet it gets after that. lol
Its not our duty to enforce the rules though. You decided to take the job of mod/admin and now you have a duty to do. If you don't like it, then step down and give someone else the job. I don't mean to sound like i'm making your job as a mod/admin easy, i have nothing but respect for you guys. Besides, if we start doing bans off popular/unpopularness, ALOT of people would be banned that have done nothing wrong but have an opinion, or type horribly.
A good thread to read, kinda based around that topic is here: http://www.qcdn.org/ffxi/showthread.php?p=734308#post734308
The Peregrine thing is fucked up, I admit. I wasn't aware he had his account here. Going to be honest. If all your doing is teling us to start doing the job that we've been told to do, then I guess we should start from the beginning.
Shyrra, Kelyon, Kage, Rannoch, Neo, and a whole shitload of other people would have to be banned for spamming and derailing.
Meeze, Romper, Garvin, and a shitload of other people would be banned for flamebaiting (even the slightest hint of flamebaiting, cause that's what the rules are, and we have to be fair and unbalanced).
A majority of people would be banned for having more then one account that matches their IP. What's that? You have 2 people in the household? Sorry. We have to be fair and unbalanced in our decisions and since we can't adequately determine if there is truly two of you in the household, then we'll have to ban the account and the sockpuppet.
Sounds fine to me.
No standard punishment is listed for this. Presumably this would result in deleted posts, and only a ban after repeat offenses. I see no reason why anyone would "have to be banned" for this.Shyrra, Kelyon, Kage, Rannoch, Neo, and a whole shitload of other people would have to be banned for spamming and derailing.
Another situation where deleted or moved posts, or warnings would suffice. Why are we jumping straight to bans?Meeze, Romper, Garvin, and a shitload of other people would be banned for flamebaiting (even the slightest hint of flamebaiting, cause that's what the rules are, and we have to be fair and unbalanced).
I don't even see a rule regarding this. Again, why is the immediate solution a ban, especially for something that amounts to an "internal memo" or "lurk moar"? If this is written somewhere, I apologize, because I have looked at two rule threads, with no hint of this.A majority of people would be banned for having more then one account that matches their IP. What's that? You have 2 people in the household? Sorry. We have to be fair and unbalanced in our decisions and since we can't adequately determine if there is truly two of you in the household, then we'll have to ban the account and the sockpuppet.