Bond. James Bond.

[Morwen]

Because he was fucking horrible >_>

Brosnan and Connery are the best Bond actors I think. The Roger Moore movies were just pure camp in my opinion and they tried their best to revive the series with Timothy Dalton but didn't quite get it going. Brosnan saved Bond.

I'd have to say that Dr. No and Goldfinger (Thunderball is alright too) would be my Connery favorites and GoldenEye and The World Is Not Enough would be my Brosnan favorites.

I haven't seen Daniel Craig's interpretation yet but I know that Craig is a fantastic actor so I have hope.

 

[Pasquale]

Casino Royale was too long imo, but Craig does make a pretty good Bond.

Totally agree. Craig did a good job, but Casino felt like it went on forever.

Surprisingly, nobody has mentioned Peter Sellers as Bond in the *original* "Casino Royale" (1967).

Why?

That guy looks like such a wiener.

 

[Sanoske]

In my opinion, Connery is the best Bond. He plays both parts of the role very well. (tough Bond and suave Bond) I do love Pierce though, he is amazing. By far the most suave Bond. I say Connery, but really... it's so tough to choose. And Craig falls in right behind them.

 

[Miros]

Pierce and On Her Majesty's Secret Service

 

[Romper]

Surprisingly, nobody has mentioned Peter Sellers as Bond in the *original* "Casino Royale" (1967).

Why?

Because the original Casino Royale was terrible it was a joke of a Bond movie. It had Woody Allen as the villain not to forget the ending. OH man was that movie just bad.

 

[Rips]

Daniel Craig. Woot he's awesome.

 

[hellstorm]

Brosnan may have been a bit more suave, but he lacked the whole tough-as-nails thing. Daniel Craig really pulled that off in Casino Royale.

Overall, it's hard for me to pick a single 'best' Bond. They all had their own style.

Could not agree more there all good.

 

[Negorissimo]

The Bond franchise should be known from here on as: James Bond B.C. and James Bond A.C.

That means, BEFORE and AFTER Daniel Craig's Casino Royale. ^^