celesia is a thief

Once again you are talking about what?!?!? Show me where I said anywhere that Celesia should be kicked or shunned from his/her social LS? Yea, thought so. All you want to do is refer back to the Dua situation over, and over, and over, and over, and over....your point is what again?

And this:

Firestreak said:
Is Yanzi your new master now that you're not Cerescole's loyal dog anymore? =p

I don't understand. What the hell is that supposed to mean? The most I know about Cerescole is exping with him/her on my blm a long, long time ago. Can't say I've even seen or said a word to that person in a couple of years. Where you are going with that I have no idea. Just another attempt of yours to push the thread way away from where it started. You are quite notorious for doing that.

Firestreak said:
By the way Laur, when you can explain to me how 1 person can accept a thief into their god LS and then give a social LS a hard time for one of their LS members BECOMING a thief in your arguments(if you call them that), then I'll stop swearing at you and pointing out your lack of intelligence. Until then there's not much else to say because it's sort of like arguing with a small child and all they'll say is "you are that but what am I?"
 
tidy said:
I meant to put that post after I saw Neosquall's but people posted before me.

Stop being a dickhead plz kthxbai

Alright put ur dick in between ur legs and run like a duck mother fucker
^^^
See I can swear tooo!
 
Arien said:
Once again you are talking about what?!?!? Show me where I said anywhere that Celesia should be kicked or shunned from his/her social LS? Yea, thought so. All you want to do is refer back to the Dua situation over, and over, and over, and over, and over....your point is what again?

maybe he's got a secret crush on dua? :nono:
 
yanzi said:
maybe he's got a secret crush on dua? :nono:

By golly I think you might have nailed it on the head Yanzi! He'll be sad to know that Dua rarely plays anymore. Have to take his boyhood crush somewhere else. Poor little guy. =/
 
Arien said:
I don't understand. What the hell is that supposed to mean? The most I know about Cerescole is exping with him/her on my blm a long, long time ago. Can't say I've even seen or said a word to that person in a couple of years. Where you are going with that I have no idea.

Yah, I have to admit, I didn't get this part either, Fire. Laur and I used to invite Cere when I was leveling whm and he blm. Back then, it was Laur and I who were inseparable, not Laur and anyone else^^.
 
Darklion said:
No thats not it at all but to say that they are good ppl and be blind to the fact that they stold makes you as I said an idiot.
Hey, please point out where ANY member of UnderworldNA has denied that it happened, maybe then you'd actually have some grounds for bashing a social shell. 80% of the linkshell is in competing endgame shells, but we try to leave the drama at the door, because it's a social shell. You're pissed because it happened, fine that's understandable. That doesn't give any reason to bash people who had no control over it happening, and who didn't even know it happened until this thread was made. I haven't been on UnderworldNA in a few days, but I don't imagine Celesia logging on and going "hey, guess what I stole from perfect!"

Firestreak is right, just asking loaded questions like the ones you and yanzi have been asking, and making snide remarks regarding UnderworldNA is just as insulting as coming out and calling us all thieves. You not liking his saying your linkshell supports thieves because of one member but having no porblems saying that UnderworldNA supports thieves because of one member is hypocricy at it's finest. You want to insult someone, insult someone who was involved, not the people who have nothing to do with it.
 
Bajaratt said:
Firestreak is right, just asking loaded questions like the ones you and yanzi have been asking, and making snide remarks regarding UnderworldNA is just as insulting as coming out and calling us all thieves. You not liking his saying your linkshell supports thieves because of one member but having no porblems saying that UnderworldNA supports thieves because of one member is hypocricy at it's finest. You want to insult someone, insult someone who was involved, not the people who have nothing to do with it.

it was a perfectly legitimate question. i only want to know if any repercussions will happen now that the LS he's in knows what happened.
in no way did i mention underworldNA as a thief or haven for thieves.
 
yanzi said:
it was a perfectly legitimate question. i only want to know if any repercussions will happen now that the LS he's in knows what happened.
in no way did i mention underworldNA as a thief or haven for thieves.
You're expecting ramifications from a social shell, when as Firestreak pointed out your gods linkshell did nothing regarding dua, that's what I mean about hypocracy; it takes away any right to ask for such things. I don't really care about what your shell did/does, but at the same time you shouldn't be implying things about other shells.
 
Bajaratt said:
You're expecting ramifications from a social shell, when as Firestreak pointed out your gods linkshell did nothing regarding dua, that's what I mean about hypocracy; it takes away any right to ask for such things. I don't really care about what your shell did/does, but at the same time you shouldn't be implying things about other shells.

why don't you just answer the question instead of getting your panties in a bunch? a "no, nothing is going to happen" will suffice if that's really what the shell wants to do.
i'm asking if anything will happen, i'm not asking for anything to happen. clear enough for you?
 
yanzi said:
why don't you just answer the question instead of getting your panties in a bunch? a "no, nothing is going to happen" will suffice if that's really what the shell wants to do.
i'm asking if anything will happen, i'm not asking for anything to happen. clear enough for you?
Fine, we'll take a page from your book, nothing is probably going to happen.
 
So what many people were waiting for, this shows exactly what happened:

pol%202006-01-28%2017-21-29-14.jpg


pol%202006-01-28%2017-21-34-59.jpg


pol%202006-01-28%2017-21-39-70.jpg


pol%202006-01-28%2017-21-47-09.jpg


pol%202006-01-28%2017-21-49-65.jpg


pol%202006-01-28%2017-21-52-67.jpg
 
seriously, i dunno what you think underworld is, mostly a bunch of old friends who we've known for a long long time. If you think any of us would ditch a friend because they did one thing wrong you're sadly mistaken. Cel's a decent person, very nice and very helpful. anyone who'd ditch a good friend because of one error of judgement is a sad sad person. really i'm distgusted that anyone would, especially since at times like this people need friends more than ever. mistakes are made and people have to live with them over their heads forever, a real friend won't hold it against them.
Even if you can't defend the choice i know most everyone can empathise and imagine what was running through cel's head. It was wrong, indefensible, yes. Why make drama over it? If every linkshell kicked every person who had something hanging over their heads then half the endgame would be wandering around shell-less.
Of course nothing is going to happen. it's a social shell, cel's a friend. if you can't count on friends to be there for you right or wrong you don't have any real friends. can you condemn a social shell for keeping a person with a bad rep? half of the endgame people have bad reps. ha;f the people who
ve posted are in shells that harbour people with bad reps. she was kicked from the dnamis shell. let it be done and over with.
Baj, i know you're a bigger man than this. walk away please. are you seriously gonna argue with someone so sophisticated that their location is "your momma's house"? it's like arguing with peregrine.
 
Blackchaoshero said:
seriously, i dunno what you think underworld is, mostly a bunch of old friends who we've known for a long long time. If you think any of us would ditch a friend because they did one thing wrong you're sadly mistaken. Cel's a decent person, very nice and very helpful. anyone who'd ditch a good friend because of one error of judgement is a sad sad person. really i'm distgusted that anyone would, especially since at times like this people need friends more than ever. mistakes are made and people have to live with them over their heads forever, a real friend won't hold it against them.
Even if you can't defend the choice i know most everyone can empathise and imagine what was running through cel's head. It was wrong, indefensible, yes. Why make drama over it? If every linkshell kicked every person who had something hanging over their heads then half the endgame would be wandering around shell-less.
Of course nothing is going to happen. it's a social shell, cel's a friend. if you can't count on friends to be there for you right or wrong you don't have any real friends. can you condemn a social shell for keeping a person with a bad rep? half of the endgame people have bad reps. ha;f the people who
ve posted are in shells that harbour people with bad reps. she was kicked from the dnamis shell. let it be done and over with.
Baj, i know you're a bigger man than this. walk away please. are you seriously gonna argue with someone so sophisticated that their location is "your momma's house"? it's like arguing with peregrine.

i'd rather be at yo momma's house instead of trying to bid on a nonexistant SH+1 at the AH.
 
Blackchaoshero said:
Baj, i know you're a bigger man than this. walk away please. are you seriously gonna argue with someone so sophisticated that their location is "your momma's house"? it's like arguing with peregrine.

lol yanzi got called peregrine...
 
Back
Top