celesia is a thief

Firestreak said:
But yes, why don't you respond yet again with, "But Valks and Perfect R different!"

This is simple, if you stop trying to associate the two, I would stop trying to show you how you are wrong about it... :crazy:

Why did you bring up Valk's name in the 1st place? Oh thats right, you were trying to make it seem like because Dua had joined Valkyrs, that the OP was a hypocrite for saying that Celesia was a thief........... even though the two shells have nothing to do with each other....... please continue :biggrin:
 
I've been in OH for about 9 months, I've never seen Prophecy steal. For the greater extent of the time here we've had an open bank where it's all documented and points are shown.

Prior to that we had a bank system where the money was simply divided to pay for cursed items for certain members in the interest of increasing strength. For example we sold the cloths from our Kirins and bought Togis for our MNKs as well. This required trust which OH members had and of course non OH members started rumors. Unfortunately for the rumors Prophecy having already had his sky gear for the most part didn't benefit from the system. It more benefitted members like Warick or Delite with expensive abjuration they couldn't have afforded. The rumors didn't die out til we converted to a point system. But to this date no member or ex member has directed accused Prophecy of ripping anyone off.

Therefore I can't really comment except to say obviously the situation is very different than Dua or Celesia. All stealing I know of is of ex members with opportunity and a chip on their shoulder about disagreements in what they earned and how the numbers work out for them.
 
kriist said:
This is simple, if you stop trying to associate the two, I would stop trying to show you how you are wrong about it... :crazy:

Why did you bring up Valk's name in the 1st place? Oh thats right, you were trying to make it seem like because Dua had joined Valkyrs, that the OP was a hypocrite for saying that Celesia was a thief........... even though the two shells have nothing to do with each other....... please continue :biggrin:

Not really, and I'd prefer you not argue my case if you're going to insert obvious flaws into the reasoning.
 
yanzi said:
you accepted penut. ignorance is not an excuse.
i don't run valks, i don't have any say in valks, and i don't speak for valks. what the shell does with dua doesn't have anything to do with me. what part of this can't you understand?
ok, here's an example for you. you live in america. in america, random police violence happens (rodney king, the marine guy shot today). so, since you live in america, you must advocate this stuff right?
or the thousands of innocent iraqis and whatever killed in the gulf, are you responsible for their lives too?
my point is that someone may be a member of something, some organization, live in some place. but it doesn't mean they always agree with what is going on. and that just because someone is a member of something, some organization or lives in some place, it doesn't mean they agree with everything that goes on. capische?

Ignorance is a great excuse. And Penut is not a thief by my definition. Penut left BoL and kept his nobles tunic. That is not thieving. They seem most upset that he chose to sell the tunic I believe instead of keep it. And again with the country bologna? I hope the smarter half of you realizes how weak this is.
 
How could I present your case without the obvious flaws, If YOU cannot present your case without the obvious flaws? Come on man.... give me something to work with here. :nono:
 
Firestreak said:
Ignorance is a great excuse. And Penut is not a thief by my definition. Penut left BoL and kept his nobles tunic. That is not thieving. They seem most upset that he chose to sell the tunic I believe instead of keep it. And again with the country bologna? I hope the smarter half of you realizes how weak this is.

try pleading ignorance in a court of law, see how far that takes you. ignorance is never an excuse for anything.
i might as well say Dua was not a thief by my definition. i don't know the story, for all i know, that SH was his. same thing?
it's only bologna because you have no valid retort and resort to petty insults.
 
kriist said:
How could I present your case without the obvious flaws, If YOU cannot present your case without the obvious flaws? Come on man.... give me something to work with here. :nono:[/quot

lol....someone else is starting to feel my pain..... :nyam:
 
kriist said:
How could I present your case without the obvious flaws, If YOU cannot present your case without the obvious flaws? Come on man.... give me something to work with here. :nono:

My case might have flaws, but my case and the case you're presenting for me are different. I might as well say you're wrong because it's not right to call all black people thieves. It's true that it's wrong to say that... but where did you say it? If you can't make a case against me without making things up might as well just back down.


yanzi said:
try pleading ignorance in a court of law, see how far that takes you. ignorance is never an excuse for anything.
i might as well say Dua was not a thief by my definition. i don't know the story, for all i know, that SH was his. same thing?
it's only bologna because you have no valid retort and resort to petty insults.

I don't think much of what Penut did, and your ignorance is no excuse argument is rather lame. It talks about being ignorant of the law. Like if I didn't know it was illegal to drive blindfolded. That meaning does not carry over into situations as such. And it makes little sense. I didn't steal. I didn't break any "laws". I was simply unaware someone else did. And I did kick that person. And they weren't technically a "thief".

dua1.jpg


dua2.jpg


Here you go. Yes Dua was a thief, and yes now you DO know it.
 
Fire I cant think of a retort for your post, therefore, it is all bologna. :)
 
Firestreak said:
What, of 260 million Americans, some are bad people. Therefore all linkshells are completely unaccountable for anything their members do? This is a sensible argument?

You just contradicted your screenshots and what you've been saying............
 
yanzi said:
you accepted penut. ignorance is not an excuse.
i don't run valks, i don't have any say in valks, and i don't speak for valks. what the shell does with dua doesn't have anything to do with me. what part of this can't you understand?
ok, here's an example for you. you live in america. in america, random police violence happens (rodney king, the marine guy shot today). so, since you live in america, you must advocate this stuff right?
or the thousands of innocent iraqis and whatever killed in the gulf, are you responsible for their lives too?
my point is that someone may be a member of something, some organization, live in some place. but it doesn't mean they always agree with what is going on. and that just because someone is a member of something, some organization or lives in some place, it doesn't mean they agree with everything that goes on. capische?


Firestreak said:
What, of 260 million Americans, some are bad people. Therefore all linkshells are completely unaccountable for anything their members do? This is a sensible argument?

:banghead3:
 
I think your reading comprehension might be worse than mine ;/
 
Honestly.... this is getting boring.

Ok fire, you proved that Dua stole the SH (Not that anyone was saying he didn't).... Just one question for you....

What the fuck does that have to do with this thread????

This thread is not about Dua.... This thread is not about Valkyrs.... This thread is about one thing and one thing only.... I'm not even going to say it, let's see if you can figure it out on your own.

I'll even give you a hint.... *whispers* look at the title of the thread...

:crazy:
 
Kriist said:
Honestly.... this is getting boring.

Ok fire, you proved that Dua stole the SH (Not that anyone was saying he didn't).... Just one question for you....

What the fuck does that have to do with this thread????

This thread is not about Dua.... This thread is not about Valkyrs.... This thread is about one thing and one thing only.... I'm not even going to say it, let's see if you can figure it out on your own.

I'll even give you a hint.... *whispers* look at the title of the thread...

>>


Firestreak said:
My point is this.

hypocrisy
1. The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.

By posting here on this OP, Yanzi is officially denoucing Celesia for being a thief.

This is a value that remains very important to me. I hate thieves with a passion. They disgust me and I can't stand being associated with them.

So when someone professes their dislike of thieves, and questions a linkshell by associating themselves with a thief, a light goes off in my head. Does this person really share my values, or, do they profess my values without holding them dear.

I attempted to prove, well, this is a person who tolerates thieves. This is a person who cheers thieves on, if they happen to be in their corner. This is my personal view. This is how I see it. I have my own set of morals, they may not be yours. Thsi is a public forum, I said my views.

And it is my belief that if/when Dua returns, Yanzi will continue to accept Dua while treating Celesia harshly, and expect others to, for the exact same thing.

Your problem is you are interpreting a specific target as a direct attack on all of Perfect.
 
I have been reading this thread and it seems blatantly clear what fire is trying to question.

Basically how can you post about somone stealing and trying to hold thier LS accountable when you the same person is in a LS that takes self admitted thieves and is ok with it.

That is called Hypocricy.
 
Firestreak said:
Too much sarcasm, just say your point.

I wasnt being sarcastic about the reading skills:biggrin:

My point, was that Yanzi was using the country example to talk about herself, you were taking it as standing for the linkshell. Was just hoping you'd pick up on that when I bolded those parts out. Just pointing that out, I have no interest in arguing on this point.
 
Back
Top