Crime and Punishment.

Status
Not open for further replies.
They're usually deleted. Link to the thread is do-able but again all related posts are usually soft-deleted and can't be viewed unless you're orange or red.
 
They could be posted as a quote in the punishment thread; Although with the likes of certain famous banned posters, it might cause headaches >.>
 
Another option but not one that could be implemented consistantly. If we ban someone for posting personal info then post it in the C&P thread...
 
I was actually referring to posters that couldn't be understood with several multi linguists and experts trained in communicating with animals, but that applies too.
 
Yeah good point, we've got more than our fair share of dolphinsheeps around here.
 
CmdrFly said:
Another option but not one that could be implemented consistantly. If we ban someone for posting personal info then post it in the C&P thread...
Click to expand...

Then replace the personal info with ******** instead of 101 Some St, Sometown, USA.

The reason I ask is because I have absolutely no idea why you banned romper. Flamebaiting is a rather general description and could mean any number of things.

It's not that I think his ban was unjust, I just want to know which straw broke the camels back.
 
Trippyhippy said:
Then replace the personal info with ******** instead of 101 Some St, Sometown, USA.

The reason I ask is because I have absolutely no idea why you banned romper. Flamebaiting is a rather general description and could mean any number of things.

It's not that I think his ban was unjust, I just want to know which straw broke the camels back.
Click to expand...

I was banned because I lol'd at Dowzer posting a picture of the google add talking about needing math help because of Maths.
 
romperstomper said:
I was banned because I lol'd at Dowzer posting a picture of the google add talking about needing math help because of Maths.
Click to expand...

If it was just the 'lol' for that thread, I wouldn't have given a second thought to just a warning. You made a good argument, and I like to think I'm reasonable which is why I went ahead and lifted the ban instead of being a dick about it. You had a prior warning in the same thread - and then posted 'lol' in response to Dowzer.

Between 2 threads in the last 3 days in 'Good Times', 20+ posts have had to be deleted. People need to start using their brain cells and not let their fingers get away from them.
 
Arctyrael said:
If it was just the 'lol' for that thread, I wouldn't have given a second thought to just a warning. You made a good argument, and I like to think I'm reasonable which is why I went ahead and lifted the ban instead of being a dick about it. You had a prior warning in the same thread - and then posted 'lol' in response to Dowzer.

Between 2 threads in the last 3 days in 'Good Times', 20+ posts have had to be deleted. People need to start using their brain cells and not let their fingers get away from them.
Click to expand...
Ok it wasn't for the lol post.
 
Arctyrael said:
If it was just the 'lol' for that thread, I wouldn't have given a second thought to just a warning. You made a good argument, and I like to think I'm reasonable which is why I went ahead and lifted the ban instead of being a dick about it. You had a prior warning in the same thread - and then posted 'lol' in response to Dowzer.

Between 2 threads in the last 3 days in 'Good Times', 20+ posts have had to be deleted. People need to start using their brain cells and not let their fingers get away from them.
Click to expand...

He's already been warned, and banned for flaimbaiting. The new rules make things pretty clear about flaimbaiting. But I guess you need a certain degree of ignorance to become a mod.
 
Arctyrael said:
If it was just the 'lol' for that thread, I wouldn't have given a second thought to just a warning. You made a good argument, and I like to think I'm reasonable which is why I went ahead and lifted the ban instead of being a dick about it. You had a prior warning in the same thread - and then posted 'lol' in response to Dowzer.

Between 2 threads in the last 3 days in 'Good Times', 20+ posts have had to be deleted. People need to start using their brain cells and not let their fingers get away from them.
Click to expand...

Even if this is true, he clearly had a warning prior to his first suspension of a week... So shouldn't his offense given him a 30 day suspension? Even if it was resolved Romperstomper had a prior

Quoting from Cmdr's Penalties guidelines

Flamebaiting
Attempting to start an off-topic argument with the OP, or one of the other posters in the thread. Generally initiated amongst foes - allied flamebaiting may be acted on in the form of soft-deleted posts.

1. 1 warning (infraction)
2. 7-day tempban
3. 30-day tempban
4. permaban
 
meeze said:
He's already been warned, and banned for flaimbaiting. The new rules make things pretty clear about flaimbaiting. But I guess you need a certain degree of ignorance to become a mod.
Click to expand...

Don't even start unless you would like me to ban you.
 
jyakotsu said:
Even if this is true, he clearly had a warning prior to his first suspension of a week... So shouldn't his offense given him a 30 day suspension? Even if it was resolved Romperstomper had a prior

Quoting from Cmdr's Penalties guidelines

Flamebaiting
Attempting to start an off-topic argument with the OP, or one of the other posters in the thread. Generally initiated amongst foes - allied flamebaiting may be acted on in the form of soft-deleted posts.

1. 1 warning (infraction)
2. 7-day tempban
3. 30-day tempban
4. permaban
Click to expand...


The guidelines have the infractions seperated for each type of offense. While he had received a warning for flamebaiting, the following post was debatable, as I later realized after talking to Romper. I'm not out to burn witches or toadstools, I'm just trying to help keep the clutter to the correct forum. ALSO, the guidelines allow for mod's discretion. In which case, Romper pointed out a few things, and I thought they were good points.
 
Arctyrael said:
The guidelines have the infractions seperated for each type of offense. While he had received a warning for flamebaiting, the following post was debatable, as I later realized after talking to Romper. I'm not out to burn witches or toadstools, I'm just trying to help keep the clutter to the correct forum. ALSO, the guidelines allow for mod's discretion. In which case, Romper pointed out a few things, and I thought they were good points.
Click to expand...

i understand that Arc, however my point on the issue was this:

If it was romper's Third offense, which it was(1 warning from Miros, 1 Suspension from Miros, 1 from you Arc) SHouldn't his offense warrented a 30 day instead of a 7 day? Or is that the Mod's Discretion part that i dont understand?
 
Bold might help.
CmdrFly said:
Note that this is an outline and not a law. Mods may still use their discretion in varying the length of penalty should extreme cases call for additional attention. There will be discussion amongst the mods for any scenarios deemed inconclusively defined.
Click to expand...

And just for you Meeze:
CmdrFly said:
Don't like the rules? Get bent.
Click to expand...
 
It would have been a 7. And yes - it all can fall to discretion. Guidelines are not etched in stone and unfortunately, once they become available - they become much like commandments. I am willing to deal with people that are willing to work with me. There is no need on a casual forum such as QCDN to piss in people's cheerios 24/7.
 
CmdrFly said:
Bold might help.


And just for you Meeze:
Click to expand...

All that says is that there isn't a mod with any sort of nuts to be the one take the lead. You guys are content being seen as a group of idiots, rather than 1 tyrant with people who help his rules be enforced.

My guess is you guys are all meant to be followers rather than leaders, which is pretty much par for the course as far the make up of the RPG gaming community.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top