Formal request to have Roofie banned from this site.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Roofie said:
Sneakypants said:

Aw :( even tho was going to anyway, i'm so hurt, im crying on the outside but laughing on the inside, the japs do hate us, granted not all of them but 90% of them, u dont have to admit it, but its true, kiss my ass if u dont like it

Josh, you honestly don't know when to quit.

/signed
 
Sure he's an ignorant, bigoted, vacuous, potty mouthed, insipid little troll, but these are the flameboards....I dunno, it's a tough call. On one hand, I absolutely detest everything I have seen him post, but on the other hand, he is doing it in the right place....although on the other other hand it says somewhere rather official that qcdn isn't a democracy, and is, in fact, an autocratic organization, so.....hmm.....
 
Maybe there's a way to confine his posting to this section? That way, if you want a roofie (and the name speaks volumes about his personality) free day, then don't go to the flameboards. Just a thought.
 
Oh, Mr. Wonko, I belive "Quetzalcoatl Daily News is not a democracy, participating in this community is not a right but a privilege, stick to the above rules and you will have a good time, violate them and you may be asked to leave." is likely what you were talking about. It's the footnote on the Rules of Conduct.
 
go ahead and ban me, it wont change a god damn thing, just because the bulk of u stupid fuckers wish u were japs doesnt mean they like u anymore, quit being stupid, god damn wannabe japs make me sick
 
Don't you realize, Roofie, your just as bad as them?

By generalizing, your giving into the same ignorance that fuels this whole mess.

I am gonna say, though, I am against banning. He made all these comments in the flameboard, and as the rules says, anything goes on the flameboard.

SO if you want to change the rules, so be it, but give Roofie a warning first
 
Technically roofie isnt flaming, he is demoralizing and purposfully antagonizing people. this is a case of not banning him because he is posting on the flameboards. this is a case of banning him because what he is posting has no quality whatsoever, nor does it belong anywhere in QCDN, flameboards or no.

I can understand peoples perspective of saying he is not breaking the rules, but giving him a warning, or letting it go and have him continue to upset people will just fan the flames.

He needs to go.
 
? Respecting people and wanting to be them are two different points. I think you're just mixing up the two.

Just a thought. Freedom of speech even has its limits. People limit groups like the KKK in society, why can't we do the same for people who have the extreme views as Roofie? His kind of attitude is what starts hate crimes, which apparently can add to the severity of a crime if it's linked to the incident. I don't see why there's any need to bother going to that extreme.
 
Mega, flaming is demoralizing and purposfully antagonizing people.

And while this is quite a tame flameboard, read Sculli's post about edit:

On the Flameboard anything goes, you will not be able to edit your post, what's said is said, so think before you post.

So, I think you give Roofie a warning, and if he keeps this shit up, drop the ban hammer on him
 
This thread sorta cracks me up. Roofie and a few others throw around terms like "faggot" and "cocksucker" in the flameboard and little gets said. Roofie says he hates the Japanese, says "nuke the Japs" and now he's gone too far?

Homophobia getting short shrift to racism on the outrage scale is something I'm used to and I don't expect anything to change, but still... this cracks me up.
 
Hal, I think your point is really valid and I even feel bad for not seeing your point before. Yet, I think people say Roofie has stepped over the line in this case, because it has become so extremely flagrant. Basically a racial slur is equivalent to a slur concerning sexual orientation, but i think "nuke all japs" takes it a step beyond either of those.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top