Half naked women in avatars/signatures

MajorHavoc said:
One of the topics in this thread is having an animated .gif in your sigs/avatars/posts...

SCULLI, BAN HER! =P

wow :P I totally forgot that was animated XD
 
The fact that this thread has gone to page 26 really surprises the hell out of me. Great comments though. I ordered a thrillhammer for some of the gals of qcdn. :) First one to shoot me her mailing address will get it :P

WSM, I'll teach you a new word. Petite. I've known women in AMERICA of all places who looked 12 even though they were in their 20's. Hell, turn on Fox or Nickelodian (if that's more geared towards your age) or whatever. Just about any tv show with any "teenage" actor/actress is NOT an actual teenage.

Now, in Japan, it's even worse. If you're 16, you look 10. If you're 20, you look 16. If you're 27, you look 20. If you're 30, you look 24... and on and on and on.

Anyway, most of your posts are pointless so I'll just leave it alone at that.
 
Wow, 27 pages about that avatar.

The general discussion board is just {too weak}

quetz5df.png
 
Kat said:
I understand what you're saying Ele, but again, seeing an avatar with an Asian woman bouncin' her tits all over the place for an IPod ad vs. a joke about a threesome with Sculli, Jender and I are very very different.

If y'all cannot comprehend that fact, then honest to God all I have to say is "whatever". I'm really tired of goin' round and round (and I'm sure Jender is also) about the difference.

1.) Her tits were far from 'bouncing all over the place'.

2.) Previously you argued that Jender's sig was ok because a child reading it would not really understand it, and thus it could not affect them. Given that logic - how does is it that this exchange is acceptable;

"I have all the sex you need right here!"
"Me too!"

Or even Jender's current and previous titles; "Hooray Boobies!" and "Busty Wench". Or her 'location' - listed as 'In Alanon's Pants'.

Should Alanon feel objectified perhaps? Obviously not - since he is putting himself out there by willingly engaging in such banter. Likewise I am not objectifying the model, who puts herself out there everyday to be viewed and appreciated as beautiful. It's her job for crying out loud - I think it's safe to assume that she does not mind.

I never said you had to 'enjoy' the image - but I will not be called a penis driven chauvinistic sex fiend who debases and objectifies women, simply based on one goddamned image.

Once again - I never said men are the only ones allowed to speak openly about sex. I never said it was bad for women to be open about sex. I never said women were worth less than men. I certainly never said they were objects.

All this being said - I will not listen to someone who does all this - then proceeds to discuss the effects of various foods on the taste of semen - when they try to take the moral high ground with me.

Everyone else who had a legitimate problem with it, you already have my apologies for making you feel uncomfortable. That was never my intention, and I truly am sorry to be the cause of your discomfort.

For those of you who have already displayed a certain level of comfortabilty discussing, joking about, and viewing images relating to or of sex; you do not have a leg to stand on, so stop hopping on the bandwagon, it detracts from those who have legitimate problems.
 
Raivyn, you know I like you, and I'm lovin' this debate, but bottom line you put that chick in your sig for attention and cuz of the bouncing tits and for no other reason.

Let's get real here.

As far as Sculli goes and the joking threesome, and I am NOT putting on airs in any way, shape or form, Jen and I have "known" him since almost the inception of qcdn. The same as Jender and Alanon. Imho, it was just 3 friends (be it online, but still friends) screwin' around.

Again, that is a big damn difference than you putting a friggin' model dancin' with her tits beboppin' all over your signature.

You wanna call a spade a spade, well then there you have it.
 
Kat said:
Raivyn, you know I like you, and I'm lovin' this debate, but bottom line you put that chick in your sig for attention and cuz of the bouncing tits and for no other reason.

Let's get real here.

As far as Sculli goes and the joking threesome, and I am NOT putting on airs in any way, shape or form, Jen and I have "known" him since almost the inception of qcdn. The same as Jender and Alanon. Imho, it was just 3 friends (be it online, but still friends) screwin' around.

Again, that is a big damn difference than you putting a friggin' model dancin' with her tits beboppin' all over your signature.

You wanna call a spade a spade, well then there you have it.

Fair enough. I agree, and I do have no problem with your jokes at all. Hence I had absolutely no problem removing the sig.

My argument does indeed still stand though.

P.s. *whew* I'm glad you still like me ^^
 
Well of course I like you, you goof. Hell you should look up some of the past arguments between Vang and I. And I luv that total elite horses ass dearly^^.
 
Kat said:
Well of course I like you, you goof. Hell you should look up some of the past arguments between Vang and I. And I luv that total elite horses ass dearly^^.

lmfao XD
 
Just a couple of things to contribute to this thread.

#1 There is a great big difference between pics and words. Talking about sex is 1 thing, pictures of awesomely gorgous bouncing exotic asian bresteses is totally different.

#2 Um jender, what were you saying about objectifying women? you sexy thang you...

and I mean that in the most respectable way.

0054a7fk.jpg
 
lol

That was a pic of a SHOW I did last year - not something I wear out and about to the mall <3

Yeah I see what you mean....but it's not like my shit is hanging out and bobbing ;)


Anyway - I am bored with this thread - thanks to all who participated in a good debate. I still don't think that speaking saucy is the same as Raivyn's pic, but we can agree to disagree. ^^

I am not a FLAMEBOARD kinda gal usually, so this was a fun change of pace from the regular "Off Topic" and "Reality Sinks In" conversations I am used to. <3 See you all again!
 
I see both sides, honestly...I just don't get why it's still going round and round. Sculli deals on an individual basis, as he should. He's been quite clear. I'm sure he'd not hesitate to let someone know if there was an issue with text or an image. So??? ... Nothing to see here.


BTW - Is that fucking Stryper? Or however they spell their name?
lol
 
Sneakypants said:
BTW - Is that fucking Stryper? Or however they spell their name?
lol

I have no clue myself, but if you boys wanna put one of the hair bands in your sig, please put G n' R in there. One with Axl and his sizzlin' hot leather pants he wore in making the vid of "Sweet child o' Mine". Oh myyyyyyyy. :D
 
Kat said:
I have no clue myself, but if you boys wanna put one of the hair bands in your sig, please put G n' R in there. One with Axl and his sizzlin' hot leather pants he wore in making the vid of "Sweet child o' Mine". Oh myyyyyyyy. :D

G n' R > Stryper for sure.
lol
 
Sneakypants said:
BTW - Is that fucking Stryper? Or however they spell their name?
lol

ROFL

YES!

I logged in and read this - this just made my day, thanks snaky XD!
 
Raivyn said:
ROFL

YES!

I logged in and read this - this just made my day, thanks snaky XD!

Stryper RIPS!!!!!!!!!!
They have crazy licks and mad chops!!
<Stryper voice> Oh yeeeeaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
They kind of look like a pack of tigers.
 
Answa~ said:
Yes... indeed.

PS I hate doing History homework...


Homework sucks, be it "history" or "econ"...Now, "the future of boobies" would provide for some great homework.
 
Back
Top