- Joined
- Jun 29, 2004
- Messages
- 6,086
- Location
- Jerk's Face...
- Website
- www.bigtalent.com
- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- Linkshell
- PheonixPimps
My sig is me objectifying myself....not others. Why can't you see a difference?
Raivyn said:Those images are readily available to everyone (ages 0 on up) waltzing in the malls of america - areas which have FAR more young people and families than this community.
Oh and because none of this is at all objectifying.
http://www2.victoriassecret.com/com...F-192138&page=4&cgname=OSSLPPJSZZZ&rfnbr=1721
http://www2.victoriassecret.com/col...1&cgname=OSSLPPJSZZZ&cgnbr=OSSLPPJSZZZ&page=3
I'm sorry but inviting people into your "pink love cabin" is far more objectifying than a cute model dancing.
Also - this is an online gaming forum, but jender's sig is acceptable? Please explain.
jender said:My sig is me objectifying myself....not others. Why can't you see a difference?
Kat said:Again, you didn't answer my question. What does a lingerie catalog that you see online at a Victoria Secret site, at a SHOPPING mall where you buy clothes and or lingerie have to do with showing lingerie in an avatar on an FFXI GAMING forum?
Raivyn said:I don't care about that - it's the fact that it's more explicit than a girl dancing and showing a little skin.
.
jender said:Meh, IMO someoen who needs to have scantily clad women in avatars and sigs = desperately lonely computer nerd who can't talk to real women, in life.
jender said:How can you tell she was cute - could you see her face?
jender said:How can you tell she was cute - could you see her face?
Kat said:Okay here's the difference. A parent can shy away from a VS store when they have their child with them. A parent can block a VS site on a computer. BUT, why would a parent want to block a FFXI gaming site? Unless of course, they started looking at the avatars of half naked girls in certain peoples sigs and or avatars eh?
Think about it ...
Raivyn said:Considering not many 13 year olds play this game, it's not too much of a problem. Also considering the average age at which an american loses their virginity is now 13 - I think parents have bigger problems than that.
Also - even with no pictures, would you want your 13 year old kid coming up to you and asking you to explain Jender's sig?
"Mommy how do you drink fluids out of somebody?" Oh that would be just fine and dandy I suppose, right?
jender said:Would it fix the boo-boo if I removed my sig quote? No one else seems to be bothered by it (unlike your pic), but if it would make YOU feel justified...
Raivyn said:In my experience children are extremely inquisitive - it is well within the realm of possibility that this would happen.
But alas - it is taboo to show images of scantily clad ladies but it is perfectly fine to openly discuss oral sex in a public forum.
Answa~ said:"Mommy how do you drink fluids out of somebody?"
Well, when you were just a little baby, mommy used to let you drink some super milk to make you all big and strong and to protect you from all the nasty little germs that make you sick.
Something like that?
Answa~ said:You exchange fluids when you kiss... Doesn't have to be oral sex; and it's not really that open.
Answa~ said:You exchange fluids when you kiss... Doesn't have to be oral sex; and it's not really that open.
just fixed a few things to clarify what I think jender has been trying to get at.Raivyn said:I honestly don't give a crap about either - I would just prefer people remove their heads from the sand and develop some consistency is all.
Revealing clothing = not ok.
Comments about oral sex [edit]its implied, but not actually said, thus could be taken anyway[/edit]= ok.
Dancing women [edit]with their boobs hanging out[/edit] = not ok.
Lingerie adds [edit]where are they on this website?[/edit] = perfectly acceptable.
I can't be the only person wondering "wtf?" right now.
Btw - the only reason I was aksed to remove the .gif is because animated .gifs cause lag in forums.