I'm-So-Owned-Ope.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Eleibfrid said:
Lemme break this down for you, Isotope:

Sneakypants *was* a moderator.

Sneakypants stepped down from said moderator position for having to censor what he wanted to say.

Sneakypants has made a thread many moons ago stating he had stepped down. Said thread is here: http://www.qcdn.org/showthread.php?t=23595 , please take notice of the date in which it was posted, and that how it has not been edited once.
Doesn't matter if it was editted or not, it was still a single post, which was locked shortly after. There were no facts, just a farewell message.
Eleibfrid said:
Sculli has made private messages also stating the reason of why Sneakypants stepped down as a moderator.

None of the writing that Sneakypants or Sculli have provided was fabricated in any way, shape, or form. And yes, ask any of us moderators if it was fabricated - it was not.
Considering the type of characteristics displayed already by mod Alyada, I'm still questioning the integrity here. Plus your just normal people that just happen to run a board, your not part of the government or in any position in which you'd be held accountable & face dire consequences for anything, what reason is there not to lie?
 
Isotope said:
EDIT: I just went back to check the FB guidelines again & found a few interesting things.....
http://www.qcdn.org/showthread.php?t=34848

1. Although I'm not sure if it makes a difference, your not the mod for the FB, Nasya & Eleibfrid supposedly are, so you just might be stepping outside your juristiction.
2. Guideline #2: Also, use this board for game-related threads only. This board is NOT to be used to flame peoples real lives in any way, shape or form. If you do, the thread will be locked, removed, and you will be temp-banned. If it happens again, permanent-ban.

Well that last one applies to pretty much all the trolls and possibly yourself even. Are you going to follow through with doing your job as defined in the guidelines by the admin & mods of QCDN? I thought not.

3. Although I took #2 from the guidelines thread which was actually posted inside the Flameboard, this part was still in with the message as if the OP had been copied from another forum: "These guidelines will be enforced equally in the flameboard."

1. I'm a Super-Mod, which means I mod the entire board.
2. Yeah, you see, that also applies to you. I should just ban the lot of you for breaking the rules, fortunately, I'll probably only do it to you. Why? Because you started it. It is one thing to bring it up, another to respond to it. Plus, I like Skaw & Meeze & Mish & RoM & all of the people that responded to you after you posted pictures of your woman--I mean sister.
3. Better look into your sentence structure there, kiddo. I can't understand what you're saying.
 
Isotope said:
Doesn't matter if it was editted or not, it was still a single post, which was locked shortly after. There were no facts, just a farewell message.

First you say that you won't believe it because it was fabricated. Now all of a sudden it doesn't matter? Picking at straws there alittle bit? Nevermind the fact that the topic said "Mod duty" and the first sentence in the thread was "I retire." Yeah, those are facts there.


Considering the type of characteristics displayed already by mod Alyada, I'm still questioning the integrity here. Plus your just normal people that just happen to run a board, your not part of the government or in any position in which you'd be held accountable & face dire consequences for anything, what reason is there not to lie?

We're not lying. You're just wrong. Haha, that's all there is to it.

Do I need to get Dr. Cox again?
 
Eleibfrid said:
We're not lying. You're just wrong. Haha, that's all there is to it.
It hurts me to agree with Isotope, but he isn't completely wrong on this. :/
 
Isotope said:
I think your mistaking me with Kage's cat. BTW you probably got worms in your pee pee now.

Isotope said:
I'm not gonna call you a liar man, gay marrages are the new thing! Go with it if it's what makes you happy. But now.. if Bush is your mother, I guess that makes Osama your father... Musta been great at Christmas, mother spouting out lies to you & your father giving you an AK47.

Do us all a favor and grow the fuck up, please, you are just getting lower and lower every time you post, to the point where you are resorting to middle school comebacks, I'm probably younger than you and at least I can make an argument without making cheap insults.
 
Alyada said:
1. I'm a Super-Mod, which means I mod the entire board.
2. Yeah, you see, that also applies to you. I should just ban the lot of you for breaking the rules, fortunately, I'll probably only do it to you. Why? Because you started it. It is one thing to bring it up, another to respond to it. Plus, I like Skaw & Meeze & Mish & RoM & all of the people that responded to you after you posted pictures of your woman--I mean sister.
Exactly the type of shady characteristic I was talking about. Moderators aren't supposed to side with anyone, they are supposed to stick to the board guidelines & facts, not their opinions. Don't believe me? Go ask a moderator at an official board, who gets paid for doing it.
Eleibfrid said:
First you say that you won't believe it because it was fabricated. Now all of a sudden it doesn't matter? Picking at straws there alittle bit? Nevermind the fact that the topic said "Mod duty" and the first sentence in the thread was "I retire." Yeah, those are facts there.

We're not lying. You're just wrong. Haha, that's all there is to it.
Your defense holds no water man. A topic name means nothing & taking his word for it makes your defense even weaker. Present facts if your going to continue please.
 
Isotope said:
Exactly the type of shady characteristic I was talking about. Moderators aren't supposed to side with anyone, they are supposed to stick to the board guidelines & facts, not their opinions. Don't believe me? Go ask a moderator at an official board, who gets paid for doing it.
Your defense holds no water man. A topic name means nothing & taking his word for it makes your defense even weaker. Present facts if your going to continue please.

Are you going to start paying me!? Cough up the dough, I'll PM you my paypal account.
 
Kage said:
Do us all a favor and grow the fuck up, please, you are just getting lower and lower every time you post, to the point where you are resorting to middle school comebacks, I'm probably younger than you and at least I can make an argument without making cheap insults.
Oh, but you enjoy when others do it hehehe. Go make a napoleon hat out of watermelon for your kitty, your avatar is getting dull.
 
Alyada said:
Are you going to start paying me!? Cough up the dough, I'll PM you my paypal account.
Doesn't matter if you're getting paid or not.
 
Garvin said:
It hurts me to agree with Isotope, but he isn't completely wrong on this. :/

Depends on the point of view. Normally dragging RL matters into the board gets you in huge trouble, but he dragged his own RL into it for the most part, others are just calling BS on it.

And regarding his forum conspiracy theory over Sneaky's "quitting, wink wink"...he's entirely wrong.
 
Isotope said:
Oh, but you enjoy when others do it hehehe. Go make a napoleon hat out of watermelon for your kitty, your avatar is getting dull.
Hey, go try to insult something other than my avatar, go ahead, I dare you. It may seem strange to you but you can actually do that! :shok:
 
Isotope said:
Your defense holds no water man. A topic name means nothing & taking his word for it makes your defense even weaker. Present facts if your going to continue please.

I don't have to defend anything. You're the one who's dragging this on for near 30 pages, denying any facts brought your way because it disagrees with you, posting pictures of your "sister", and to top it all off - resulting to childish namecalling toward people who have time after time after time after time after time after time proved you wrong. Your defense hasn't held water since your first post in this thread. (And trust me there, I'm not the only one who thinks so.)
 
Mishaela said:
Depends on the point of view. Normally dragging RL matters into the board gets you in huge trouble, but he dragged his own RL into it for the most part, others are just calling BS on it.

And regarding his forum conspiracy theory over Sneaky's "quitting, wink wink"...he's entirely wrong.
He's definitely an idiot regarding sneakypants. Other than that, yeah, even when he's technically right, he's still off.
 
Mishaela said:
Depends on the point of view. Normally dragging RL matters into the board gets you in huge trouble, but he dragged his own RL into it for the most part, others are just calling BS on it.

And regarding his forum conspiracy theory over Sneaky's "quitting, wink wink"...he's entirely wrong.

Yet another person who just wants people to take their word for it. Still no proof. Cmon, moderators should be able to come up with something if true proof of what they & others say in the matter exists. Me, I'm not the one defending sneaky, I'm the one making the acusations, it's the defendant's job to submit proof and clear their client's name.
 
Isotope said:
Yet another person who just wants people to take their word for it. Still no proof. Cmon, moderators should be able to come up with something if true proof of what they & others say in the matter exists. Me, I'm not the one defending sneaky, I'm the one making the acusations, it's the defendant's job to submit proof.
...in what the fuck country exactly?
 
Garvin said:
...in what the fuck country exactly?
Sorry, I gotta remember that some people live in 3rd world countries & have a weak legal system.

The U.S of A! Basically the country that fucked itself by letting Bush into office.
 
Isotope said:
Me, I'm not the one defending sneaky, I'm the one making the acusations, it's the defendant's job to submit proof and clear their client's name.

No, actually the defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. As you "prosecutor", it's your job to prove without a shadow of a doubt that the "defendant" is guilty. If there is any hint of ambiguity, you cannot deliver a guilty verdict.
 
Isotope said:
Sorry, I gotta remember that some people live in 3rd world countries & have a weak legal system.

The U.S of A! Basically the country that fucked itself by letting Bush into office.
THIS IS NOT PHOENIX WRIGHT.
 
Rappa said:
No, actually the defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. As you "prosecutor", it's your job to prove without a shadow of a doubt that the "defendant" is guilty. If there is any hint of ambiguity, you cannot deliver a guilty verdict.
But not when it's the state VS whomever. In this instance, although I am no government, but I suppose I am representing those on QCDN that are curious about the integrity of the mods now, I guess you could say I'm the state.

When you go up against the state, you defend yourself or face punishement, whether innocent or not. If you can't prove your innocence, but the state is accusing you, your just plain fuxed.
 
And your still wrong. Getting closer i guess though...i think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top