Intel got fine for $1.45Billion

Vandoura

The Original PLD
Adventurer
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Messages
2,736
Age
40
Location
Windurst Water
Website
www.breakofdawn.freeforums.org
Nation Banner
Windy
Main Job
Scholar-Female
Secondary Job
Dragoon-Female
Third Job
Paladin-Female
Server
Quetzalcoatl
Linkshell
LunarSky
FFXIV
Vandoura
http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/13/technology/intel/index.htm?postversion=2009051306
EU fines Intel $1.45 billion

European regulators say the chipmaker illegally gave rebates to producers to squeeze out competitors.


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- European regulators slapped Intel Corp. with a record fine of $1.45 billion Wednesday after a nearly eight-year long antitrust case.
The European Commission said Intel (INTC, Fortune 500), the world's largest chipmaker, violated European antitrust laws by unfairly paying computer makers to delay or even cancel products that contained chips made by rival AMD (AMD, Fortune 500).
"Intel has harmed millions of European consumers by deliberately acting to keep competitors out of the market for computer chips for many years," said Neelie Kroes, the EU competition commissioner, in a statement. "Such a serious and sustained violation of the EU's antitrust rules cannot be tolerated."
The fine, which could have been as high as $3.8 billion, trumps the $1.2 billion fine levied by the EC against Microsoft Corp. (MSFT, Fortune 500) in 2008. Microsoft was accused of pricing out rivals and refusing to comply with the court's previous antitrust decision.
As part of Wednesday's decision, Santa Clara, Calif.-based Intel, which makes roughly 80% of the microchips in personal computers and servers, was also forced to discontinue to some of the rebates it gives to computer makers.
Intel said in a statement that it takes "strong exception" to the EC's decision and pledged to appeal.
"We believe the decision is wrong and ignores the reality of a highly competitive microprocessor marketplace," said Paul Otellini, Intel president and chief executive, in a statement. "There has been absolutely zero harm to consumers."
Otellini said Intel does not sell products below cost, but he added that the company does discount prices to remain competitive.
The case dates back to 2001, when the EC began investigating AMD's claims that Intel was engaged in unfair business practices. However, Intel was not charged until July 2007.
The announcement came just two days after President Obama's top antitrust official said the administration will aggressively crack down on antitrust violations, reversing a Bush-era policy that had weakened the government's ability to take on monopolies.
After Bush became president in 2001, an increasing number of plaintiffs, including AMD, opted to take antitrust cases straight to European courts.
"The EU decision will shift the power from an abusive monopolist to computer makers, retailers and above all consumers," said Giuliano Meroni, president of AMD's European division, in a statement.
The ruling serves as the latest setback for Intel. Last month, the company reported its first-quarter profit fell 55% and revenue fell 26% on plummeting PC sales.

Intel's stock was up 16 cents in pre-market trading to $15.37 a share.
mmmm 1.45billion, Intel going bankrupt?
 
Not likely. The EU fined Microsoft a boatload of cash in Antitrust lawsuits, and they didn't go under, so it's highly unlikely that this will hurt Intel all too much.
 
mmmm 1.45billion, Intel going bankrupt?

Intel and AMD are pretty much the only processors out there for computers(Dunno what Mac uses....although I think they have Intel computers now also.)

Yea. Their gonna go bankrupt from this one! /sarcasmoff
 
Yeah, a billion and a half dollars isn't really an impressive figure when you're talking about corporations. Personal bank accounts, yes. Small businesses, yes. International companies, no.
 
this amount, and the pr from it, will hurt intel but will not roll them over.
 
I agree with Falseys perspective that it will hurt but not cripple and the truth is that this will just be put into higher prices for the consumers so the people who actually lose are the consumers. Plus they can dick this around in court for the next 10 years while they are overcharging their customers to cover the difference. If i remember AMD was on had been on somewhat shakey ground financially so i see nothing really to keep both companies from increasing their prices. Intel to pay the fine and AMD to stay alive.

Although seeing as AMD is currently trading at junk stock level it may be a good idea to pick up some AMD as a response to this lawsuit since it is like 4.50 a share.
 
AMD chip are soo cheap :P this is why i stay with AMD.. i don't need no $1k chip when you can get something for $300 or less from AMD that perform same task just a bit slower
 
AMD chip are soo cheap :P this is why i stay with AMD.. i don't need no $1k chip when you can get something for $300 or less from AMD that perform same task just a bit slower

You're kidding, right?

If you're looking performance-wise, Intel really is the way to go. Basing your value on its price is kinda lol at best - and I've historically been an AMD person. However, their quality has been exceptionally shitty since they bought ATI.
 
You're kidding, right?

If you're looking performance-wise, Intel really is the way to go. Basing your value on its price is kinda lol at best - and I've historically been an AMD person. However, their quality has been exceptionally shitty since they bought ATI.

Why buy higher priced furniture when I can buy Ikea for pennies on the dollar!
 
Why buy higher priced furniture when I can buy Ikea for pennies on the dollar!

Did you not hear that the guy who founded Ikea became the richest man in the world?

Spoiler:
That was, until he spent all his money on good furniature.

Spoiler:
*rimshot*
 
If they were really worried about Intel dominating the market and stifling competition they would do something to help AMD like give them the money to compete better. Instead the EU is just going to keep the money and put it in to their general fund. How exactly that levels the playing field to increase competition is beyond me.
 
Back
Top