/sigh. its like an elementary school in here sometmes. i was feeling lazy and drinking my coffe this morning when i responded, so i only put half-hearted effort into it. i apologize.
it wont happen again.
vang said:
Wow, so you can't have good gear AND be skilled? I dont understand that concept. When are you people going to realize gear and skill have nothing to do with attitude? When did someone say I was gimped? When did someone say I was a horrible Ranger? When do you take your medication next?
i dunno wth this is other than masturbation. im not talking about your skills as a rng or your equip. i dont give a crap what you have or how you play. you still seem to be glossing over the point that turning into a "good" player has less to do with what you have on than it does with how you work as a party member.
vang said:
Anyhow, so THIS is your flame? Boring, its about powerleveling in the game and 2 things that have nothing to do with me, but since you lubbb me so much, Syn, I will respond. Im sure you won't respond back, since that is the trend around here. So lets dance, shall we?
see above im tired of you forcing me to repeat myself because you just dont "listen".
vang said:
" Most Every post i've ever seen from you is all about the gear, (or lack thereof), Other peoples bad attitudes (which is you must admit ironic, but in your case its more like having tunnel-vision), and over-inflated. Though i've seen you type out a few rather nicely coherent paragraphs in a few spots. (maybe this is 10,000 chimps on 10,000 typewriters writing shakespeare?) [say vang...your not a mukny are you?]"
That sir, is simply a misnomer, completely false, I did not bring up my gear, the others did. I simply stated that I would not go to 56 without my Ebow, that is not me bragging about gear, I didnt even have it yet you silly goose^^ That is me not being satisfied with settling for "the average or standard gear" like you do hot tits =P
(actually it would be misstatement not misnomer, just fyi) this goes back to the hypocritical thing you yourself posted once vang. once again I reiterate (in case you somehow missed it in the first part) I DONT GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR GEAR. My Point was (which you obviously missed), that your posts Constanly Bitch about peoples lack of good gear.
vang said:
"I have a strong suspcion that you Bought you Gil from IGE or some other such place."
Bingo! I knew you were a scrub, this is a typical scrub remark...Syn im going to make this short and simple.
People DO make gil in this game, some people DO know how to make a good amount of it and catch on quick and find their "niche" if you will in Vandy. The flipside to this is....not everyone does
So, after 75 levels of being a halfass Ranger who probably scraped by, you get a bitter old man like yourself. Ranting like a crazed old coot about the next guy being "with" while you are "without". Its ok, I hear it all the time. I pretty much stop getting pissed about it a while back.
if anyone was paying attention vang didnt deny my accusation. also: see more of him talking about what great gear he has, and i dont. maybe you never did START the stuff about Your crap, but you sure do seem to enjoy tossing it around now. and as i said (one more time we call this repetitive reinforcement which aids learning) my point on gear was how much you down other peoples. you did that with no prodding. that was all you baby. ^^
vang said:
"My main problem with you, is that your lack of reading comprehension bugs me. Thats all. You can be better than as many people as you like in game and in here. Fine by me friend, we all have out little delusions of granduer.
It just makes me think that perhaps we made the wrong choice in electing a president that ran the country into billions of debt and expanded the educational system by 1% for the next year.
I fear for my childrens Education vang!"
What in the sam hell are you rambling about? My reading comprehension? I was only ever confused one time, by your "flame thats not really a flame but you call it a flame so we treat it like a flame" I doubt im the only one who did not recognize any attack on me in your babbling...that is if people still do read your boring posts. Your talking about your children's education and my comprehension? Who was your English teacher? Dr. Dre? I counted like 8 million writing errors in your post. Mine is not perfect either, but I am not criticizing one's compehension skills.
i edited out the last bit of this part as it went totally of tangent.
/sigh see, like i said it was too subtle for you. that part served the dual purpose of Not belonging there while at the same time insulting your obvious lack of being able to argue things in logical order.
it was more to make fun of your comment that my posts make no sense....yet all it did was confuse you even more. what a waste. its so much less fun when you have to spell things out for people.
vang said:
"oh and one last thing:
"Its all a jealousy game I can tell with you already."
nope. but I already know enough about your personality type to safely reson that it Would be for you. you fit the type perfectly.
^^ i'm sure that'l work out for you though.
if your going to attempt slanders and goads to bug me on a personal level you'll have to try a different tactic. I left name-calling out on the playground in grade school.
~Syn"
Well Syn, I know your bitter towards me, your whining all day long about me, and now your flying off the handle with gil buying accusations as well (see: "admitting defeat") You really should have been a BST, so you could keep your negativity limited and your xp leeching to a minimum. But we wont worry about that you have your 75 levels, and im sure you worked really hard to be the "BEST" Rng you could be, no regrets. So I will wrap this up with 2 things I would like you to remember before I call it a night:
1. I will be a 75 Ranger, and be completely satisfied that I worked hard for all the rare and valuably gear I have accumulated and the fact that I "did it right" and always had the best of everything.
Can you say the same? Your pissed about something, just quit dude.
2. Actually Syn, quit now while you can, because believe me, its going to be REAL embarassing when I take your spot in your HNM LS, when they realize who is a Ranger, and who is a "Whiny, broke, bitter elf with a bow"
Keep my seat warm bitch, I will be moving in soon 8)
i think this was supposed to be a strong closing on your part vang. but its really too funny to be anything other than a joke. i give you an A for effort though its deserved. However a flame can take several forms and you just used one of a frontal attack on my
1. ingame character
2. efforts on my toon
3. intelligence
my ego really isnt in such a dire straight that this kind of thing will bug me. /comfort
vang said:
Our steamy love affair continues, with a twist! Syn has completely gone bonkers :?
(1.)Call me dense, but I broke down your whole post and answered 99.9% of what I had seen (2.)to the best of my ability, yet I still am missing out on your post? I think most would agree, sans your boyfriends (3.)you ran off and told ingame to come in and defend you, I answered basically everything you posted completely and without fail.
1. I did you moron.
2. keep trying bucko ^^
3. yes because i desperately needed defending. (this is sarcasm btw in case you missed it)
vang said:
I understand Syn, I have been in many argument before on seperate FFXI forums, and when someone is losing terribly, their desperation attack always comes down to 2 things, the intelligence card or the gil buying accusations.
Despiration had little to do with it. you also failed to include into your response to my accusation the incorrectness of it. scrub doesnt really count, and the entire respone was nothing more than "how lame i am". fuck name calling, its entirely pointless. if all you can do is come back to me with bucko, and champ and other attempted sweetly-sarcastic snubs, im going to stop Playing because its fucking Boring. look at my name Bud, sarcastic humour to someone named Synical is dont you perhaps think less than effective? it only works well on people that cant Do it Themselves. ^^
vang said:
Your spewing references about Ed Prior and some Vasquez guy? Im supposed to feel flamed because of this? I dont know who either of these guys are, does that mean im pwned!!!111? Your so much brighter than me Syn, you so crazy! ^^
Im pretty sure I referenced Richard Pryor, but I will give you a break this time. Just remember to allow a few buffer hours for you medication to kick in before you romp around on this board making no sense, k?
heres how this goes.
1. you begin to flame me for bringing up prior. 2. you admit that you dont know who he is. 3. you bring up that you mentioned him to begin with, yet in 2 you say you dont know who he is. 4. you talk about me making no sense. jesus, insert foot-in-mouth.
to clarify; vasquez is the comedian responsible for the munky comment you lazy shit, google and 15 keystrokes could have told you that. i was correcting your imroper comparison of sarcastic humour to priors more over the top style. what that has to do with anything i dont know, but you brought it up to begin with so i blame you for that.
vang said:
The last part was tricky, gil buying accusations for your first post? Wow, thats a new tactic, see krono threads and such on how I deal with scrub talk like that. Thats fucking pathetic man, you lose. Now, normally I let the forum population decide on my debates and arguments on who they think got the best of who, but when you sling out gil buying accusations on someone you don't even know, fuck you, you lose, end of story.
yeah i accused you of it and i will continue to do so until you either deny or admit to it. why? because of the reasons i posted originally. if you didnt understand how the accusation went along with the reasons in the previous post, to bad. have your mother explain it to you or somthing, im not a fucking grade-school teacher ive not the patience for it.
wow you got touchy about it though. its really pretty easy to either say fuck you i never bought 1 gil my entier ffxi gaming career, or yes, yes ive bought 5 mil.
vang said:
Thanks for your best regards, Syn. Feel free to run and tell all your ingame friends that im being a big meanie again and you need some back up. Because, as I see it, your on real shaky ground with me and I don't know how your going to get yourself out of this one.
in game vang? /shrug i wouldnt bother. i dont think your name has ever come up once in there. i think your still struggling with what it means to be a moral person that can help another person Learn. be the best you want, but youll never master anything until you can teach it back. im still learning what it means to be a name-calling scrub dissing ego inflated windbag, i know im not very good, but ill get better i promise, just keep the pointers coming. ^^
TiyaKelth
TiyaKelth said:
vang said:
Number 3 is the complete truth, this is a real pet peeve I have with this board, I have never argued with so many pussies on a forum before in my life. You want to talk shit all day, but when I respond, you run away like little bitches, hoping no one bumps the thread again, hoping everyone will forget how Vang made you look dumb.
Syn, you were really all over the place with your "flame"... Talking about Shia and her PLing experiences, and then uhh, flaming(?) Vang about it, when it has nothing to do with him
yes yes, we had a secret meeting to help me save face. lol wth, its like pople have deaf eyes. my above stated post was that vangs lack of reading ablity bugs me. And if you paid attention vang never said he didnt buy gil. he actually said "Bingo" which in some circles is another way of saying "yes!". and i never said i knew he had, it was just a supposition, but i do belive i stated that.
As for my weak "flame".
If its as vang seems to think about nothing more than name calling and attemped ego cuts, im so not interested in that. as Scully once said theres different ways to "flame" (or shall we define it as "Argue a point"?) Of course, its Important in That case to Not Lose Sight of the point, which is why my last post was so ironic.
but im here to amuse myself, not you.
~Syn
;
