Monster Signa Is it worth it?

[Ryuoho]

I'm having a really tough time debating with myself why I should keep it. I know it's useful for Beastmaster, or so I hear, but as a Bard, I don't see why I should keep it around anymore. The CHR+ is really nice but the only time I'd need it would be sleep, requiem, and elegy. Earth and Light staffs seem to have a much more success rate.

So I'm asking you all,
Is Monster Signa useful for Bard 51+?

 

[Silfer]

No

 

[Bajaratt]

The elemental staves are better 51+, the same with BST. You're supposed to get a lot better charm rate with a light staff than with monster signa.

 

[hellstorm]

ya what they said.

 

[Direwolf]

Bsts I know who had it think its a load of garbage.

 

[Lavi]

If you still do BCNM 40 as BRD, I would keep it. Otherwise sell it.

 

[Ryuoho]

Don't do BCNM 40's
Done
Sold
Money in the bank

 

[Shakaar]

BST's don't get much use from this either. At least I never bothered getting one. I've always used my BST AF1 in BCNM 40's, and I never had many charming problems pre-51. Post-51 the light staff outshines the monster signa in every test I've ever seen or heard of.