New Medal of Honor on Wii

Ruffyreborn

Jai Guru Deva, Om
Adventurer
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
3,198
Age
38
Location
Elizabethtown, Ky
Website
www.facebook.com
Nation Banner
Bastok
Main Job
DarkKnight-Male
Secondary Job
BlueMage-Male
Third Job
Paladin-Male
Server
Quetzalcoatl
Linkshell
United
FFXIV
Ruffyreborn
Im not much a fan of these WWI and II games... Because there are SO MANY of them. But, the graphics have taken a leap since the Call of Duty. Just take a look!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckpxmiVWwZA&eurl=

I wont be getting this... But it doesnt look bad. Looks like it would be fun, actually.
 
Wii's graphics are pretty bad, thankfully they made a fun console :D Even Zelda looked like shit to me. Hopefully the developers just haven't reached full capacity of the systems abilities just yet.
 
Strid said:
Wii's graphics are pretty bad, thankfully they made a fun console :D Even Zelda looked like shit to me. Hopefully the developers just haven't reached full capacity of the systems abilities just yet.
It might just be me, but I dont think they have.

Super Mario Galaxy, no matter how cartoonish the graphics are, are very nice.
 
Strid said:
Wii's graphics are pretty bad, thankfully they made a fun console :D Even Zelda looked like shit to me. Hopefully the developers just haven't reached full capacity of the systems abilities just yet.

In Zelda's defense, it was originally developed for the GC and ported to the Wii at the last minute. So, the low-res textures and lack of voice acting are because it was designed for a different console (though, I am fond of Medina's half-japanese-half-gibberish language).

Apparently, there is a new Zelda in the works for the Wii. Hopefully, that'll be a stronger title graphics-wise. Though, in my experience, graphics mean jack crap. You can have the prettiest game in the world and it'll mean nothing if the gameplay is sub-par.

Give it time, Big N won't fail us.
 
I personally hope zelda doesnt pick up on voice acting :( But thats just me. I like the reading of the game. And even though it was a GC port, the graphics were extremely good, considering.
 
Alyada said:
Though, in my experience, graphics mean jack crap.

Just to note, not sure if you guys picked up on this or not, I'm the same way. Just the mentioning of Medal of Honors graphics being good made me comment on their graphics. I didn't buy a Wii for graphics nor any other Nintendo console. They seem to bring the fun more than the graphics and I'm totally fine with that.
 
Strid said:
Just to note, not sure if you guys picked up on this or not, I'm the same way. Just the mentioning of Medal of Honors graphics being good made me comment on their graphics. I didn't buy a Wii for graphics nor any other Nintendo console. They seem to bring the fun more than the graphics and I'm totally fine with that.
well, I will say, graphics definitely mean something. Maybe not everything, but they definitely help me in my final decision of getting a video game. But, the difference between me and the hardcore sony/microsoft fans is that I dont put graphics on the same scale. A lot of people are like "7/10 has to be graphics" and "3/10 has to be other game elements" I disagree with this, and say a video-game is a video-game, ever aspect of the game only makes it better. Its not really a graphics vs. gameplay vs mechanics vs. w/e. All aspects should work together.
 
I haven't played a medal of honor game since Call of Duty was first released, this one looks interesting though, I might rent it.
 
Back
Top