New Rule Suggestion - Vote!

Enstate?

  • Total voters
    59
Status
Not open for further replies.
Skaw said:
You'd be correct. Everything over the internet that I've given up, I've given up silently. Every job I've quit, I quit with no ulterior motive other than having found a better job. You don't need to flip out in the process of leaving. Just get up and do it.
Click to expand...

Well I wish everybody could be perfect like you. The fact is, people make mistakes. And sometimes people break their promises. And at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter.

I'm pretty sure only a few of you actually have a problem with kink. The rest are just part of the mob mentality. In fact, the vote you set up above is a failure for no other reason than the fact that you can see exactly who voted for what. It takes a lot to go against the flow, and the average qcdner will more than likely either vote yes or just not vote at all in order to not be looked down on.

You should have made it annonymous. Basically. I don't see why you didn't. Is this a popularity contest? Or can this message board just not do it?
 
pakomen said:
I wonder how many other message boards use this tactic.

Yeah, probably none, because it's downright retarded. IF YOU LEAVE YOU CAN NEVER COME BAAAAAAAAACK!

I'm more annoyed by all the people who post on this board who don't even play the game. Or people who have quit the game 16 times. If you're gonna quit something, quit.

But it's their right and their privelege to come back if they want.

We're way too serious business around here.
Click to expand...

Why don't you tell kink that part?

I vote yes.
 
pakomen said:
You should have made it annonymous. Basically. I don't see why you didn't. Is this a popularity contest? Or can this message board just not do it?
Click to expand...

Why? Because Anonymous is for cowards. Those who vote no should state why they voted no. I can guarantee you why most people would vote no if it were anonymous would be...

The Friend Defense.

I'm not even pushing this poll to be retroactive. Kink can stay around, I don't care really. I think it would just be better if what she pulled doesn't happen again with anyone else. Consider her more of a reminder of one of the more sickening forms of seeking attention over the Internet.

Retroactively enforcing new rules is a pretty unfair thing to do.
 
Last edited:
Blancho said:
I refuse to vote because it is neither. Your fucking dumb. Kinkerbelle is the first person I've seen do it in my IDK 3yrs+ on this forum. So there isn't a huge problem with it. I'd rather ban Skaw for making dumb threads. AND I PRAY SKAW NEVER BECOMES A MOD with ideas like this one. LOL
Click to expand...
Please refrain from the flamebaiting outside of Pandora`s Box. If you want to speak your mind on this matter, about anything or anyone, make a new post on the Flameboard and link to or quote from this thread for reference.
 
CmdrFly said:
Please refrain from the flamebaiting outside of Pandora`s Box. If you want to speak your mind on this matter, about anything or anyone, make a new post on the Flameboard and link to or quote from this thread for reference.
Click to expand...

Ya that's kinda the problem with QCDN. People make new threads to talk about something that's going on in another thread. The OP made this a flame anyways even though he acts as if it's some rule he thinks should be implemented for no particular reason. By the way why are you flame baiting me? I was only expressing my opinion anyways which is what the point of the thread was, to express your opinion. Why would I make a new thread to do that?
 
Last edited:
Skaw said:
Why? Because Anonymous is for cowards. Those who vote no should state why they voted no. I can guarantee you why most people would vote no if it were anonymous would be...

The Friend Defense.

I'm not even pushing this poll to be retroactive. Kink can stay around, I don't care really. I think it would just be better if what she pulled doesn't happen again with anyone else. Consider her more of a reminder of one of the more sickening forms of seeking attention over the Internet.

Retroactively enforcing new rules is a pretty unfair thing to do.
Click to expand...

Who cares what their reason is. I agree to disagree. But I'm pretty sure you would have gotton more participation if it were anonymous. Now, the only ones who are going to vote "no" are those with balls big enough to go against the flow.
 
pakomen said:
Who cares what their reason is. I agree to disagree. But I'm pretty sure you would have gotton more participation if it were anonymous. Now, the only ones who are going to vote "no" are those with balls big enough to go against the flow.
Click to expand...

Well, you know, if you can't stick to your convictions, you don't deserve a voice. The worst thing a person can do is stay silent about their opinions and beliefs in fear of being singled out. People who wuss out don't change anything. How do you think the world would be if those who were martyred just kept quiet?
 
Last edited:
Blancho said:
Total derail here but Skaw.
1. Your avatar is so ugly it's annoying. And
2. Why is he so hairy and yet he has shaved arm pits?
Click to expand...


Actually you couldn't find a bigger dog for your avatar, so why even start with others?



Oh yeah, the poll...I voted.
 
Oh you mean people like MARAJADE and Sneakypants?

Bajaratt said:
Actually the rule makes some sense, sorry if you lack the intelligence to actually see it. She's the only one recently, but there have been others. It's like the people who say they won't post in a thread anymore and 20 minutes later are posting up a storm in that same thread; they look like fools with no self-control. If they say they're quitting the boards, then they should actually quit the boards. Hell, there were a bunch of people who quit when Sculli was in charge(and went to lolqcnn) and actually asked to have their account deleted, just so they couldn't come back easily.

If the people aren't responsible enough to stick to their decisions, then we should help them, ban them. If they want to come back, they can make a new account; enough of the trolls have done it already to know that it's possible.
Click to expand...
 
Skaw said:
Well, you know, if you can't stick to your convictions, you don't deserve a voice. The worst thing a person can do is stay silent about their opinions and beliefs in fear of being singled out.
Click to expand...

I agree completely. But this isn't a perfect world. Anyway, I've said my piece. We don't have to agree.
 
Now we need to argue about rules that aren't even in effect yet. I AM LEAVING THE BOARDS!!
 
I say put this shit into affect. Especially if you don't mention me in your goodbye thread.
 
You left the boards for good once, and didn't even have an ongoing flame fest that drew you back. I seem to remember you leaving in a very loud and obnoxious way as well.

I have no problem with you calling me a whore. And I take issue with people like you. If this was the flameboard I would tell you exactly what I think, I'm sure you will give me the chance sooner or later.

Sneakypants said:
Skaw said it best when he said, "Issues-filled whore."
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top