Nintendo/Sony/MS + Environment

Supposedly Nintendo didn't give Greenpeace information on recycling and what not, so the treehuggers gave 'em 0
 
Riiight because lack of information = auto0.
 
Supposedly Nintendo didn't give Greenpeace information on recycling and what not, so the treehuggers gave 'em 0

Riiight because lack of information = auto0.

Lack of information = bad practices they don't want to share. Zero may be a bit harsh, but for all we know, Nintendo recycles by dropping discarded console parts on rain forests.
 
Lack of information = bad practices they don't want to share. Zero may be a bit harsh, but for all we know, Nintendo recycles by dropping discarded console parts on rain forests.
Better to do that than release Vista...
 
Lack of information = bad practices they don't want to share. Zero may be a bit harsh, but for all we know, Nintendo recycles by dropping discarded console parts on rain forests.
Nature needs entertainment too.
 
Lack of information = bad practices they don't want to share. Zero may be a bit harsh, but for all we know, Nintendo recycles by dropping discarded console parts on rain forests.
Or because they don't give a shit what Greenpeace thinks. I find it much more likely they just didn't respond or didn't care to respond than they're trying to hide something.
 
Or because they don't give a shit what Greenpeace thinks. I find it much more likely they just didn't respond or didn't care to respond than they're trying to hide something.

I work in environmental safety. In my experience, when someone isn't open about their policies it's because they are cutting corners and doing things they shouldn't be doing. I'm not saying Nintendo is doing anything bad, I'm just saying hiding meaningless records like that seems shady.
 
Back
Top