It all boils down to content in the end... not the damn system, who "invented" what, and all of that horseshit. We all know, un-immitatably, Sony has, for many years, straight up killed other systems in content. Nintendo has some great games but there are more (in quantity) great Playstation games, if you argue with that... you're arguing for the sake of arguing and can go choke. Xbox has Halawl and what, ten other great titles that just so happen to be availible now on other systems and PC? Sony, I'd venture to say, has put out more titles for their Playstation 2 than the Gamecube, DS, and Xbox (old and 360) combined. Quantity doesn't always > quality but everyone must admit there are many, many quality games for the Playstation 2 and more so than its peers. I will buy PS3 simply because I will only allow myself the money to choose one. When I pick one, I want reliability... someone who, unlike Nintendo (Hello N64 meet Sega Dreamcast, both great systems too =/ ), wont just slow down or stop supporting a system with new things or games. I also want a vast selection of titles and genres to choose from which, in the past (N64+ not pre-64 when Nintendo was the shit), Nintendo and Microsoft have not given me. My choice is off reputation, not fanboism or a deep desire to hate all things Nintendo or Microsoft, just strictly who has done better in the past few console wars. One day I hope someone knocks Sony off the chart, as I hate buying a Sony product personally, but until then... They own my console dollar.