Peace QCDN.

[Rappa]

Harrassment was perfectly fine while we had the Flameboard. Something you're forgetting?

I have a pretty good memory. I seem to recall you mentioning that Sculli was a sellout [edit: when he had the coupon for buying gil post], you didn't support this shithole site, and that you were gonna leave for good. But you're still here, and you'll continue to stay even with these slightly harsher enforced rules. Anything else?

 

[Cleofis]

Not really what I got out of it at all.

It shows me how assanine people can be.

I've just had enough it's like a Kindergarten run by kids. You can't warn people of other bad players because everytime anyone does it's "Not NW material" It's a farce.

 

[Mokk]

Might want to try doing that yourself, since that's NOT WHY SCULLI ACTED. The quote wasn't a flame on the user, it was just something stupid they said. She asked Sculli to ask the other people to remove it from their sigs, and eulore apparently got pissy over it.

Here .. let me explain this one mroe time for the short bus crowd...

Sculli acted based on a user's request and because the policy allows for the user to claim harrassment/insult/etc. Therefore the sig goes against the newly established 'standards'. Now.. these standards are obviously bullshit as the enforcement since their implimentation has been mostly on the user to hand over to the mods instead of the mods/admin ... reading ... omg, and then going about doing their jobs.

Now, blazn did not complain, this i understand. However there are more than enough excuses for someone to have done something stupid and used tag's sig as a scapegoat. Scapegoating is something Sculli and i have talked at length about regarding the new rules and how one might go about breaking them or enforcing them. This is an example of a double standard due to negligence, nothing more nothing less. It's still likely someone would have abused the example provided as well as the numerous other ones out there simply to waste Sculli's time and/or abuse the system which as of yet still is not in place thanks to the length and history of the previous status quo.

I know where you're going, why didn't Sculli ask Tag to change his sig? I have no idea, it could have been he didn't know about it. He probably doesn't check sigs unless they break the board, or unless someone reports it. Regardless of if it's an oversight or if he's intentionally doing it or not; it doesn't have any bearing on the thread because BLAZN DIDN'T ASK TO HAVE IT REMOVED.

Chances are he saw it but no one bitched so he didn't bother. Even sigs that break the board manage to skip everyone's notice around here until someone gives enough of a crap to bitch which is sad. Aside from that, and let me make sure i put this so you can understand it...

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THIS THREAD AS IT'S A DIRECT RESULT OF A COMMUNITY STANDARD THAT ISN'T A STANDARD AT ALL.

... did that read louder? seriously, get a life.

aside from that it's a shadowrule no one knew about and that will ultimately lend itself to abuse.

 

[Dowzer]

I have a pretty good memory. I seem to recall you mentioning that Sculli was a sellout [edit: when he had the coupon for buying gil post], you didn't support this shithole site, and that you were gonna leave for good. But you're still here, and you'll continue to stay even with these slightly harsher enforced rules. Anything else?

Yeah because I display the persona of a user that is against Sculli's Big Brother moderating. Something this site needs more of...

...and less of pansies like yourself.

 

[Tec]

Mokk, buddy, this is a fight that cannot be won.
It is how it is. ; ;
Life isn't fair, neither is a forum run by people who are alive.

 

[Mokk]

Long-standing as in maybe a week old at the most? If it had been around before the QCDN changes then I could see your point, but when people have a quote in their sig and then change it to another quote of similar length, most people won't notice it. Hell, I very rarely read the quotes in anyone's sig, it's not hard to imagine that Sculli might do that too.

he's had that sig for quite some time now, i'd almost put money on the fact it's from the FB before it got removed. After all, something like that gets reported these days if for no other reason than principle, when put in a thread.

On the note of sculli not checking sigs... wow, ok, imagineable yes. Good thing when attempting to change the status of how things work in a social function on the board, no.

Again i say if you can't be bothered to clean up what's left hanging out of the old ways the new ways are doomed to failure.

 

[Bajaratt]

Again mokk, Tag's sig has been up for a short period of time and didn't have anyone bring it to Sculli's attention. The Shaidyn(or however it's spelled) quote probably would have escaped his notice until they complained to him. It's more likely an oversight rather than a deliberate action on sculli's part.

 

[Rappa]

Yeah because I display the persona of a user that is against Sculli's Big Brother moderating. Something this site needs more of...

You're still here, so this big bad persona is obviously a big collosial joke. But it's okay, you keep fighting the man*!

*=owner of a tiny message board that cost him money every month so you can enjoy it for free

 

[Bajaratt]

he's had that sig for quite some time now, i'd almost put money on the fact it's from the FB before it got removed. After all, something like that gets reported these days if for no other reason than principle, when put in a thread.

On the note of sculli not checking sigs... wow, ok, imagineable yes. Good thing when attempting to change the status of how things work in a social function on the board, no.

Again i say if you can't be bothered to clean up what's left hanging out of the old ways the new ways are doomed to failure.

If you'll recall, I was completely against the removal of the flameboard and the "changes" that were made to QCDN. I agree completely that if he's going to change the rules that he should always enforce them. The thing is, I'm not holding a small oversight over his head like he just caused world war 3.

If his sig really is that old, then I'm wrong. I could have sworn someone said something along those lines to blazn within the last week; but that might be something else entirely.

 

[Mokk]

Again mokk, Tag's sig has been up for a short period of time and didn't have anyone bring it to Sculli's attention. The Shaidyn(or however it's spelled) quote probably would have escaped his notice until they complained to him. It's more likely an oversight rather than a deliberate action on sculli's part.

Tag's sig has been that for quite some time, until tag himself can stick a date on it your opinion on the timeline of it being there is irrelevant to me. I know i've seen it there for longer than our new 'standards' have been out and that's enough for me.

Deliberate? most likely not. Excusable? nope.

It's not hard to notice who posts the most around here and who has recognizable names. Basicly you work from there and go down fixing things when attempting to bring new order to the boards. Instead what we have is users policing users for the most part, which is no better than what we left behind with the FB.

The mods/admin currently act as the FB-filter but the content still exists not only presently with current material but other material which has been allowed to slide for whatever reason that was left on the board after the FB removal.

If you're in to making excuses for a botched social change with neglect being it's only protagonist, beans to you. It makes you look foolish from here tho.

 

[Cleofis]

Definately older than 1 week.

 

[Dowzer]

You're still here, so this big bad persona is obviously a big collosial joke. But it's okay, you keep fighting the man*!

*=owner of a tiny message board that cost him money every month so you can enjoy it for free

This site was never his, he took control from Pupusa and decided that the "awwww lag was too harsh" so he decided to pay for it himself.

Yeah I will keep fighting, because rules like these are absolutly ridiculous.

This forum used to have a certain freedom to it.

Sculli took that away, as well as your balls.

 

[Grem]

Blazn dint make the quote

So only one capable of complaining is Blabj

 

[Bajaratt]

Hey Mokk:

Blazn, monsters will still aggro you through sneak and invisible because SE haven't introduced a spell that masks your inteligence level yet.

He's probably the most retarded french demi-hnm on the game. I like bune better than him, atleast he drops something worth killing him, and rapes less exp partys because people actually want to kill him... Sometimes he can be up hours, if not days just running around one shotting poor mages.

I remember this one time, my first trip into kuftal, I got the privelege of getting up close and personal with my first dragon. He killed me once, I can deal with it, funny, we all laughed. I raised, he ran back through the hall, one shot me again, I was annoyed, there was some chuckling from the rest of the party... The next 3 times weren't so much funny as just straight annoying. For me, and my party. Being the only one with tractor and being eager to accept raises is a recipe for disaster.

found here.

That's 11 days ago, so a week and a half, sorry if I was off by only 4 days.

<3 the person who reminded me where it was from(name withheld).

 

[Mokk]

which makes me wrong about the timeline and proves my point that much more about a double standard and lack of work done by the administration and mods to actively do something around here ... way to go, thanks.

 

[Rappa]

Tag's sig has been that for quite some time, until tag himself can stick a date on it your opinion on the timeline of it being there is irrelevant to me. I know i've seen it there for longer than our new 'standards' have been out and that's enough for me.

Deliberate? most likely not. Excusable? nope.

I disagree. Now, if we were paying for this service and were somehow a "consumer" of the qcdn "product" then yes, we have the right to demand a reasonably fast response to our concerns. But this "product" is free, and is also, as stated by the owner himself, a "hobby" of his. Thus, I would say that what we are entitled to is for a response that's leisurely and at the descretion of the owner.

Now in order to expedite the process, we are given the ability to call specific things to his attention. Now let's say he's been at work for 10 hours and comes home, only having 15 minutes to stop by and check qcdn before heading out/going to bed/whatever. With our current system, all he has to do is just check PMs to see if anything has been reported, read topic titles, then head out the door.

What you are suggesting is for him to take hours/days off to go through and comb through every single thing posted to ensure a set of rules is followed everywhere. Doable? Sure. Expected? I don't think so. Now if you as a "consumer" are doing your part and reporting problems then okay, you're helping the new system. If all you're doing is bitching and moaning that things aren't happening fast enough / well enough for your liking, then that's your fault for not helping out. It's the same with voting. You can't bitch about the elected president if you didn't vote.

 

[Dowzer]

I disagree. Now, if we were paying for this service and were somehow a "consumer" of the qcdn "product" then yes, we have the right to demand a reasonably fast response to our concerns. But this "product" is free, and is also, as stated by the owner himself, a "hobby" of his. Thus, I would say that what we are entitled to is for a response that's leisurely and at the descretion of the owner.

Now in order to expedite the process, we are given the ability to call specific things to his attention. Now let's say he's been at work for 10 hours and comes home, only having 15 minutes to stop by and check qcdn before heading out/going to bed/whatever. With our current system, all he has to do is just check PMs to see if anything has been reported, read topic titles, then head out the door.

What you are suggesting is for him to take hours/days off to go through and comb through every single thing posted to ensure a set of rules is followed everywhere. Doable? Sure. Expected? I don't think so. Now if you as a "consumer" are doing your part and reporting problems then okay, you're helping the new system. If all you're doing is bitching and moaning that things aren't happening fast enough / well enough for your liking, then that's your fault for not helping out. It's the same with voting. You can't bitch about the elected president if you didn't vote.

The fact is, this forum never belonged to him.

Technically, yes it is free. In the fact that there is no charge.



Technically, it isn't free. In the fact of Sculli's banhammer.

 

[Cleofis]

Back to my question. Where is the delete my account button? Or do I have to PM Sculli?

 

[Rappa]

Sculli took that away, as well as your balls.

Since you can't seem to get away from my genitalia, I'm going to just stop reading your posts and replying to them from this point on. Sorry, I'm not gay and I don't want you thinking about my wang anymore. :nono:

Or more seriously, you're just saying the same crap over and over so I'm not going to argue with a brick wall. Do what you wanna do, I'll do what I wanna do.

 

[Rappa]

Back to my question. Where is the delete my account button? Or do I have to PM Sculli?

Go to Change Password, open up Notepad, bash some keys randomly, copy/paste as your new password, and logout. Should get the job done. Be sure to change your custom title to let every know of your rebellious actions before you do.