Post Count +2!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Daroth said:
Noxxx said:
Why do you guys assume keits is being temp banned because he insulted Sculli? I assumed it was because he started this thread, which was just a continuation of a locked thread. This is a flame forum, not a post count farming forum, and its not like Sculli said he was banning Keits. :roll:

Read back through the posts.... restricting access from QCDN is a ban... Dont read the first post then the last one and assume you know whats going on.

Read my post, and you'll see that i know what the hell i'm talking about.

keits is being temp banned

I consider being banned a permanent situation, Sculli said:

I have temporarily removed Keits access to QCDN.
 
Here noxxx let me try to simplify this as best i can.. using your own post.

Daroth wrote:
Noxxx wrote:
Why do you guys assume keits is being temp banned because he insulted Sculli? I assumed it was because he started this thread, which was just a continuation of a locked thread. This is a flame forum, not a post count farming forum, and its not like Sculli said he was banning Keits. Rolling Eyes


Read back through the posts.... restricting access from QCDN is a ban... Dont read the first post then the last one and assume you know whats going on.


Read my post, and you'll see that i know what the hell i'm talking about.

Quote:
keits is being temp banned


I consider being banned a permanent situation, Sculli said:

Quote:
I have temporarily removed Keits access to QCDN.

I think perhaps you missed the part where Daroth said "temp" because being banned and having your access removed from QCDN is the same god damn thing.

Now, if somehow you missed it after I already bolded it for you.. they both said the same thing, different words, same meaning.

A temporary ban is the same thing as having your access to the boards temporarily removed. Same thing, got it? Do really have to say it another time.

Yes, being banned is a permenant solution, though if its noted only as a temporary ban (as Daroth noted) then well.. gee, its obviously not permanent.

Should I say it again one more time? Perhaps he'll understand then. :roll:
 
Ecks said:
Here noxxx let me try to simplify this as best i can.. using your own post.

Daroth wrote:
Noxxx wrote:
Why do you guys assume keits is being temp banned because he insulted Sculli? I assumed it was because he started this thread, which was just a continuation of a locked thread. This is a flame forum, not a post count farming forum, and its not like Sculli said he was banning Keits. Rolling Eyes


Read back through the posts.... restricting access from QCDN is a ban... Dont read the first post then the last one and assume you know whats going on.


Read my post, and you'll see that i know what the hell i'm talking about.

Quote:
keits is being temp banned


I consider being banned a permanent situation, Sculli said:

Quote:
I have temporarily removed Keits access to QCDN.

I think perhaps you missed the part where Daroth said "temp" because being banned and having your access removed from QCDN is the same god damn thing.

Now, if somehow you missed it after I already bolded it for you.. they both said the same thing, different words, same meaning.

A temporary ban is the same thing as having your access to the boards temporarily removed. Same thing, got it? Do really have to say it another time.

Yes, being banned is a permenant solution, though if its noted only as a temporary ban (as Daroth noted) then well.. gee, its obviously not permanent.

Should I say it again one more time? Perhaps he'll understand then. :roll:

For some reason, as silly a thing as this is to even discuss, i will continue to do so. I think you're confused, I was quoting myself, and then Sculli, Daroth didn't say it was a temp ban, i did. My point was that Keits hasn't been permanetly removed, he's gotten a slap on the wrist for starting pointless threads for the sole purpose of pissing off the admin of the boards.
 
Daroth said:
As in its still a ban that was not needed. And still means Sculli crossed the line.

POST COUNT +1 this one is for you keits!

What line? He gave a very mild punishment to somebody who deliberately went out of his way to piss of the admin. If Keits stopped acting an imature jackass for 3 sec, and applogized for going out of his way to piss Sculli off he'd probably already be back on the boards. But i guess its just easier to blame Sculli.
 
What the hell do people need punishment for in a flameboard?

And it'd be just as easy for Sculli to stop acting like a Nazi for 3 seconds and apologize to keits, they're both a little touched in the head if you ask me, and neither wants to give the other any grounds, so i guess its just a question of who can swallow their pride at this point....... or who has the power to ban.

<Congratulations.> Sculli you banned someone for speaking their mind on a flameboard, boy, do we know you have the power now. /bow.


P.S keits is a jackass no doubt about it.
 
Dude, Sculli DID make these boards, he put together these boards FOR FREE! He doesn't allow us to pay him, he took a lot of effort to make these boards. He DOES have the power. He might of been offended by Keits statement, and he did TEMP ban him, Keits will be back, and if anything, they BOTH should say sorry, if keits was joking around. But joking around CAN get carried away. Think of it as nuking as a BLM, sometimes you need to stop and rest so you don't catch too much hate. Keits got aggro, died, and now is at his homepoint and slowly making it back to where he was.

You can flame me, for all I really care, but to tell you, I am on NO ONES side. Yes, Sculli might of taken a bit too far, but he did also temporary band him.
 
My point is, why have the flameboard if you can't say whatever you want, i dont wanna be walking on eggshells everytime i go to say Fuck.

I compltely agree what Keits did was childish, but he's just pissed off like i am that Sculli is contradicting the whole idea of this board.

It's so we can say Whatever we want, otherwise, we might as well just call it the General Discussion with profanity.
 
You (most people) only get the impression that he's a jackass because you see him post in the flameboard. Look at his other posts on this forum, they're generally well-read and helpful. I'm not the only one who has said this, either.

C'mon, is this necessary? I know for certain that people have said worse things to someone on this board. How could you let the word "retard" bother you that much? Especially over the internet? :(

Sorry, but the whole idea of a flameboard is to flame. I don't see why this should be any different.
 
Would you really like it if you made a forum board, paid for the thing, not asking for money to sign up there, then have some guy say that you are retarded? Even if it is 'childish', thats like saying "FUCK YOU" to your dad because he gave you a room. You CAN say what you want, but there is something's that shouldn't be said. Even if it he took it too seriously, who knows? Sculli might of had a bad day today, and reading "Sculli is a retard" really didn't give him a smile. It was funny for Keits, but do you think it was funny for Sculli?
 
Dude you don't understand, Sculli put this board on here, knowing full well what will be said in here. So he can't just censor us now cause he's having a bad day.

Maybe Keits was having a bad day? maybe he just got fed up with Sculli conviniently having a bad day everytime Keits decides to post something childish.

Theres Countless posts on here with far less credential then Keits' posts, at least Keits is fighting for something he knows is wrong.

A word to Sculli, if this board is causing so much stress on you, or whatever it may be, maybe its time to just scrap it. I rarely post here and im beginning to get fed up with this bullshit.

So if everyones gonna whine because Keits loves to makes use of his Right to free speech :: reaches in his pocket :: then here's a damn tissue to wipe your tears.
 
I'm not whining, like I've stated before, I am really on no one's side.

Yes, I do agree what Keits did was childish, and maybe not good to post at this time.

Yes, I do agree that Sculli took it for too much than it really was.

However, this has only happened ONCE, which is now. Of course there is worse, but maybe Sculli decided to do something about it, and it IS a temporary ban. Freedom of Speech only goes so far, especcially when you control a certain thing. Think of this board as a workplace, we are the employee's, sculli is the boss. There IS freedom of speech, but let's say you decided to put on Sculli's desk.

"YOU SUCK" -Someguy

Now, put yourself in Sculli's shoes, what would you do at that time?

A) Fire the guy.
B) Give him a 3 day suspension
C) Just rub it off

if you picked C, so now the next day you find:

"YOU ARE THE QUEEN OF FAGGOTS" -someguy

Now, what would you do?

A) Fire the guy
B) Give him a 3 day suspension
C) Just rub it off

Even if it IS a joke, but maybe it wasn't funny to him, and wanted to stop it.
 
Id probably go apeshit on the guy, and do everything possible to hamper his life.

But this isn't the first time Sculli's done something like this.

I'm really not siding with Keits himself, and almost overfilled with joy that i won't have to read his mindless pages of shit, after shit, for a little while, but its the principle of what Sculli did, if Scull has a problem with all this stuff it should say that there ARE some rules that apply, and not just type at will.
 
You guys are missing the point.

In the thread that I made, Sculli said that repurcussions were to be had for making threads or posts only to farm your postcount.

Then, Keits farmed for postcount.

Thus, repurcussions.

It wasn't because Keits criticized Sculli. It wasn't because he was asserting an opinion. It was because he read a thread in which Sculli made a general board rule, one that applied to the entirety of these forums, and promptly went out of his way to break it anyway.

Not only that, quit getting up in arms about "FREE KEITS!!!!" and whatever you silly kids are doing. He's coming back after a temporary suspension. Or maybe he's not. Who knows? It's his choice.

Maybe he'll make a forum of his own that you can all go to so you can kiss his feet.

[/Flameboard]
 
I know little of the happenings at this board... i've been here for under a week. however i myself have been admin of two semi-active boards, and a member of quite a few. i think that under the circumstances i see only on this topic, Keits should not have been banned. it is a flameboard, and I have let people shout at me, *kiks u in teh goirn* me, and all other kinds of crazy shit in a flameboard. if they randomly inturrupt some thread to insult you, go ahead and ban the crap out of them. i never used the temp ban unless it was very nesscary to the enjoyment of other on the board, because thats like bitch slapping them then telling them to come back in three days when they're ready to worship you again.

then again, this is your forum, and i don't know the whole story. thats just my two gil.

(which, on a side note, is about all i have right now ;_;)
 
:: once again double checks to see if he's in the flameboard ::

First off, keep keits banned for all i care, i frank just dislike the guy all together.

But WHY the hell do we need reprecussions and rules in a FLAMEBOARD where ANYTHING goes.

You know why Keits made this post when he saw Scullis response in yours? Simply to defy scull because he knows he can, because once again, its a FLAMEBOARD , if this is so annoying to you, why do you search the flameboard? if theres rules that apply, why is there a flameboard? why is Keits 100% jackass? because it's a god damn flameboard.

Sculli got flamed in the, wait i love this part.......... flameboard. and seeing as thats "Defying" him, even though this is the flameboard, he put his foot down.
 
This is considered a private forum. There's truly no freedom of speech, but when you say there is a non-moderated forum, and it is indeed moderated (especially over such a trival subject/comment) it's a little bit hypocritical.

I for one, would have just said "haha, that's a good one keits" and shrugged it off, assuming that I was the owner of the board. It's useless to get bent out of shape and ban someone for it.
 
If you really have a problem with the issues, how come Keits just didn't private message Sculli and they could easily debate it in PM.

However, going public and attacking Sculli, especially when Sculli volunteers his funds to support this board, in a public way is still a personal insult. Even if it is a flameboard. And I do agree, that the post +1 situation has gotten out of hand and Sculli probably did ban Keits more for the many initial messages on the board... now if other people did Post +1 posts and didn't get banned, that would be a different story, wouldn't it?
 
Sculli still went and put rules on a board that is supposed to be free speech and international waters (anything goes) If this post +1 thing has been such a problem why hasnt sculli gone and installed a board mod that puts a 25-60 second posting interval inbetween a users post in an area of the board. There are plenty of people out there that can slap a mod like that together to control post farming,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top