Post your infractions!!! (mini-poll also)

[Kotsu]

Quiet you. The cake is *still* a lie.

You son of a bitch, read the fine print :rtfm: PEOPLE LIKE CAKE! Why must you be so evil... ; ;

 

[Miros]

You son of a bitch, read the fine print :rtfm: PEOPLE LIKE CAKE! Why must you be so evil... ; ;

It's just you are my new target to ban on this board since you won't meet me for burgers when I go to Otakon.

 

[Anttaru]

Practitioners of Flame bait and trolls complaining about others and giving advice ?

This is enough comedy to last a few minutes.

 

[Lucki]

It's just you are my new target to ban on this board since you won't meet me for burgers when I go to Otakon.

I'll meet you for burgers at Otakon if I can get admin status h34r:

 

[Silenus]

Do eeeet!!!!!

 

[Khajit]

my first infraction.

Dear Khajit,

You have received a warning at FFXI Final Fantasy XI Quetzalcoatl Daily News.

Reason:
-------
Flamebaiting

I reread the whole topic and this doesn't fit in with any past discussion in the topic so I deleted the post.

This is just a warning -- there was no reason at this point of the discussion to be calling anyone out, the topic was fairly on track and tame.

Finally, do you see the irony of calling Courtney argumentative? How would you classify your post?
-------

Original Post:
https://staging.qcdn.org/index.php?posts/907701/

DO you actually read a single thing you type? You said no such thing.
You would probably come off as less argumentative and condescending if you actually wrote things you claim to have said later on when people call you out on what you said as opposed to what you think you said but obviously didnt.

Warnings serve as a reminder to you of the forum's rules, which you are expected to understand and follow.

All the best,
FFXI Final Fantasy XI Quetzalcoatl Daily News

I dont see any irony here. I do see the argument going from it's not weak to melee while people brought in to support the argument are going "it takes normal damage for a mob of that lv" and then rewinding to "it can be weak to melee at times"
Is there some rule against pointing out that a person or group of people are arguing three different things at once and then acting like everyone else being ignorant for noting that all the arguments cant be all true?
Is there a rule against noting that another person seems to have a superiority complex when nothing that they are doing is really that much of an innovation?

 

[Linhjah]

my first infraction.
I dont see any irony here. I do see the argument going from it's not weak to melee while people brought in to support the argument are going "it takes normal damage for a mob of that lv" and then rewinding to "it can be weak to melee at times"
Is there some rule against pointing out that a person or group of people are arguing three different things at once and then acting like everyone else being ignorant for noting that all the arguments cant be all true?
Is there a rule against noting that another person seems to have a superiority complex when nothing that they are doing is really that much of an innovation?

Were the deleted post directed at me, my initial reaction would have been "Fuck you," so, yeah, I can see why it was removed.