PS3 accessories

HDMI is such a big leap for me visually that I use it on my Xbox 360 even though it means I can't use the optical out cord and therefore and using the crappy TV speakers instead of my expensive surround sound system. It's just so smooth and crystal clear.
 
HDMI is such a big leap for me visually that I use it on my Xbox 360 even though it means I can't use the optical out cord and therefore and using the crappy TV speakers instead of my expensive surround sound system. It's just so smooth and crystal clear.
Why not just route your audio through your TV into your sound system?

I've got a 15 year old receiver that only has 3 composite inputs in it(powerful as hell though), so I'm just running everything into my TV, then routing the audio back into the receiver and into my speakers. It's not as good as it could be(stereo inputs only), but it still sounds a hell of a lot better than the speakers built into my TV. If your receiver is any younger than mine, it'll probably have digital audio inputs, so there wouldn't be any loss from that method.
 
<3 surround <.<;
 
<3 surround <.<;
Which I still have, and which he would still get routing the audio through the TV first; as long as his receiver isn't old as hell like mine.
 
To those of you saying the high cost cables do *nothing*, there's a few falsities in that. For HDMI, there's a lot of benefit to Monster cables that most people are unaware of.

Sure, any HDMI cable can do 720p/1080i. Most inexpensive ones can do 1080p. Very few can do 1080p, 120hz refresh signals, 7.1 surround sound, and xv 12 bit color all at the same time. So the signal may be digital and all 1's and 0's, but it does still have bandwidth issues.

Also, I do believe Monster are the only cables to be UL certified, which is huge if you want to route it through a wall, because it's illegal to use anything not UL certified. That's really where they make their money. That and the lifetime guarantee that no matter what, they'll replace the cable.

Also, even though it's a digital signal, anything longer than 12 feet (roughly the longest the average person would use, so really not an issue to most) the signal degrades when not properly shielded. To prove this we opened up two 30 foot lengths of cables. One was a Monster, and one was a Nexxtech (roughly half the price). Put a ps3 on one end attached to an HDMI splitter with the sony made hdmi cable as a control. The two hdmi cords were attached to a tv in the two rear hdmi ports on a sony bravia xbr4 52 inch. The difference was night and day at that length. The Nexxtech really looked like a 720p/1080i signal, the Monster looked perfect.

Now commence the "I'm right and you're wrong" argument now, because I'm sure most of you are set in your beliefs about HDMIs.
 
Which I still have, and which he would still get routing the audio through the TV first; as long as his receiver isn't old as hell like mine.

Oh and just a note, 7.1 surround can only be broadcast through HDMI. Apparently Optical and Digital Coaxial can't handle it.
 
Oh and just a note, 7.1 surround can only be broadcast through HDMI. Apparently Optical and Digital Coaxial can't handle it.
I know this, but since very, very, very few people have 7.1 surround builds, and a 5.1 is still surround sound. Not that 7.1 is that much better than a 5.1 anyways.
 
Back
Top