Rep. McKinney Introduces Bill to Impeach Bush

No I don't, because I know I'm right. Without even looking at the facts, I know it would be impossible to actually execute the 9/11 conspiracy and get away with it. I couldn't give less of a shit what some dipshit living in his parent's basement thinks about the angle that the towers dropped, or what temperature they think steel is supopsed to melt at. Who cares? The conspiracy is impossible because it couldn't realistically ever be pulled off. It would require at least 10 thousand people cooperating and none of them would be able to confess.

Therefore even if Bush came out and confessed, I wouldn't believe it. I'd go up to Bush and I'd say, "You're full of shit, because you aren't good enough to pull it off because no one could do it."

Remove the thousands of dead people for just a moment, remove your politics and remove the Iraq war. Could a human being plan a pretend 9/11, hire thousands of actors to play family members of people who don't really exist and get away with it? Is it even possible?

It's not possible, but if we want to play hypotheticals here, if we increased the chance to 50/50 of working,(which it's really 0 chance of working), would any human decide that being president isn't enough, and they want to flip a coin over if they'll go down in history as being the worst person who ever lived behind hitler and die before a firing squad?

And lastly... why the fuck of all the things... would you fake a plane flying into a building? If you're going to set of bombs in the building, fake a damn bombing. It's just ridiculous.

Then people ramble off bad math at me, try and throw grainy videos and circle shit with pretend magic markers. Then you got assholes like Bustaballs explaining it's been "proven."

It just makes me angry. It makes me angry because it' s so stupid and I want to choke people. My blood pressure goes through the roof. This little bulding vein on my neck juts out. I just want to hurt things.
 
Trippy, thanks for standing up for my right to think. It seems to be something a lot of people don't like to do. If Firestreak ever read a damn thing I've ever written, he'd know I don't believe in every piece of the 9/11 theorys. I don't even fully believe in most of it. However, facts are facts and your gut feeling can't disprove them. It really doesn't get more blind than that.

Also, I have my own apartment with my own job and my own girlfriend with my own beautiful baby daughter. I'll also be starting school in January where I'll be majoring in game development. =D


Strid said:
It sets a deep anger off inside me much like people who fight "big tobacco". "Big tobacco" isn't making people use their products but they are the ones who are called killers and being threatened. Why should they have to suffer name calling and what-not because a person chose to use their products and suffer knowing the risk?
Click to expand...

By that logic, all drug dealers should be set free from prison, right? Maybe... =) If you think the tobacco companys aren't doing their best to force people to smoke then you obviously don't know their history. They've done everything they can to manipulate everyone into smoking. They lied for decades and made people think it was perfectly safe to smoke and even that it was GOOD for you. They target small children. Hmm, I remember all of the ice-cream trucks that had cigarettes on them. I remember when cigarette companys paid stores to put their products on the bottom front shelves when small children could easily access them. Thankfully, that has changed.

If the tobacco companys were truthful about everything then I wouldn't have a damn problem with them. I'm personally against the War on Drugs myself. People should be arrested for the crimes they commit, not chilling out on their couch trying to have a good time with some friends and choosing to poison their bodys. I made a big 'ol thread about it a long time ago right in this very forum section. That might be one thing that seperates libertarians from your average dem.

There's also massive amounts of evidence that shows that legalizing drugs doesn't cause drug usage to go a significant amount (A major drop if the government controls the purity of the drug.), it doesn't cause crime rate to go up, it gets the dumbasses out of prison and the dangerous criminals in, it increases the amount of taxes to be used on useful things, it increases the amount of time police have to work on useful things, etc etc. But I suppose that's all some crazy conspiracy theory as well.

http://www.leap.cc/ - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
 
Bustaballs said:
By that logic, all drug dealers should be set free from prison, right? Maybe... =) If you think the tobacco companys aren't doing their best to force people to smoke then you obviously don't know their history. They've done everything they can to manipulate everyone into smoking. They lied for decades and made people think it was perfectly safe to smoke and even that it was GOOD for you. They target small children. Hmm, I remember all of the ice-cream trucks that had cigarettes on them. I remember when cigarette companys paid stores to put their products on the bottom front shelves when small children could easily access them. Thankfully, that has changed.

If the tobacco companys were truthful about everything then I wouldn't have a damn problem with them. I'm personally against the War on Drugs myself. People should be arrested for the crimes they commit, not chilling out on their couch trying to have a good time with some friends and choosing to poison their bodys. I made a big 'ol thread about it a long time ago right in this very forum section. That might be one thing that seperates libertarians from your average dem.

There's also massive amounts of evidence that shows that legalizing drugs doesn't cause drug usage to go a significant amount (A major drop if the government controls the purity of the drug.), it doesn't cause crime rate to go up, it gets the dumbasses out of prison and the dangerous criminals in, it increases the amount of taxes to be used on useful things, it increases the amount of time police have to work on useful things, etc etc. But I suppose that's all some crazy conspiracy theory as well.

http://www.leap.cc/ - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Click to expand...

There is a difference, dealing drugs is against the law. Anyway, it's the peoples choice to use tobacco. I've never saw anyone "forcing" anyone to smoke. Sure, it's their job to say, "Hey we have tobacco, tobacco is fun and taste good" but it's up to us to decide and everyone knows the risk, unless they are absolutly 100% brainless. This day and age we know the risk, even kids, but choose to do it anyway. You can throw a billion dollar ad scheme for a tobacco commercial featuring todays hottest cartoon and we'll all still know, children included, that it is harmful and could possibly kill us. My Great Grandma' is 87. She smokes and has since she was 13. She said she knew the risk so it was apparent then too. It's kind of like what Hillary Clinton is doing to music and video games. Neither make children kill people, bad parenting does but she's not going to admit that.
 
Last edited:
Bustaballs the way you're talking, you sound nothing like a libertarian. Perhaps you should learn the underlying principles behind the libertarian party and then examine the war on smoking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top