Sculli

Yeah, but in the flameboard it was allowed(sadly). I know plenty of forums that have a no flaming rule and they worked out great.

Is it really that hard to just, accept and move on?
 
"due to lack of moderation". That'd include rules, so as I said, that was why it was the target. -_-;

And I don't care all that much about the FB being removed. My point is, there's a "report" button now, so there's no reason anyone should be calling any other forum the "new FB" unless they're not doing anything about it.
 
Lokkin said:
Yeah, but in the flameboard it was allowed(sadly). I know plenty of forums that have a no flaming rule and they worked out great.
"Most boards" dont have interaction beyond the boards themselves, and the rules are basicly designed to keep people from flaming others based on opinions (Political, religious, ect.), or other such reasons.
 
I'll accept that, doesn't stop the fact that flaming is completely forbidden on other boards too, it's not that big of a deal for it to happen on QCDN.

Quetzalcoatl Daily News folks, not Quetzalcoatl Daily Bitchathon/cry/scream/tantrum
 
Moriki said:
Flameboard became little more than

Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol
Person1: ur gay lol
person2: no ur gay lol


so ban person 1 and person 2 if that was the problem. now instead of ur gay lol, you are getting 'so and so is terrible, but i wont say his name'. Point being it doesnt help anything. And although many of the topics on the flameboard came to 'ur gay lol', there were many more that were very good topics. The problem now is, no one will post like that anymore for fear of being banned if it gets too 'heated' and someones feelings get hurt.
 
There isn't any reason for getting feelings hurt though >.> You can still warn people, just do it on NW, have proof and don't insult them, not a major downside.
 
Lokkin said:
There isn't any reason for getting feelings hurt though >.> You can still warn people, just do it on NW, have proof and don't insult them, not a major downside.
Problem is that under current rules, they cant unless the person in question comes to QCDN themselves. Because without the second half of the story, it'll get locked prety fast.
Example=The Blaze account hack. Since penut didnt defend himself, it would have been ruled "wild accusation" and deleted. Also, blaze wouldnt have been able to vent in any way. Does that mean he needs to go off spouting profanity like a G-Unit song? No. But some healthy use of the word F**K would make me feel better
 
But it really isn't necessary to do it on the forum, Sculli already talked about the rules on NW I think, so you are right on that count but I think Sculli is gonna fix that.

Proof can be provided in the form of chat logs, or witnesses.
 
Lokkin said:
Proof can be provided in the form of chat logs, or witnesses.
Not under the current rules. We've already had 2x deleted because the person in question is not a QCDN member, and it looks like the BE-Jins will also follow suit.
If the person in question doesnt show up, it just becomes a gang-fest since there will never be resolution, and thats exactly what people complained that the FB was doing..
 
I'm sorry, I'm going to have to look up some of this, shall edit this post when I have done.

Edit:


Ooookie dokie, I assume you are talking about the blessedeternity thread in the NW? It's not closed, nor is it resolved, WSM brought up an accusation without evidence, I'll agree that the flameboard being deleted has probably erased a lot of evidence in said cases but, if the issue wasn't resolved, shouldn't the evidence have been kept?

Something of a mistake on Accusee's part, in any thread where the evidence is on the now deleted flameboard
 
Last edited:
Also noticing a huge change in moderators. Seems they all come from the same or similar groups.
 
Edited my post.

Yes, the moderators have been changed, I don't understand what you mean by the same or similar groups though, could you explain please?
 
Lavi said:
Also noticing a huge change in moderators. Seems they all come from the same or similar groups.
QCDN went from 1-2 mods per forum to 3-4 mods per forum, new mods are a function of that.

I asked various QCDN members whether they would want to put in the considerable time effort to help this community out. I have a few more people who stepped up and volunteered to mod, and I will add those over the next couple of weeks.

I trust in the mods integrity to perform their mod duties as assigned. Please feel free to contact me by email or PM if you (as in the reader) have a concern regarding a specific moderator.

If that is not the case, then I would respectfully request that no implied or actual low blows are dealt to the mod team.
 
Last edited:
Lokkin said:
Ooookie dokie, I assume you are talking about the blessedeternity thread in the NW? It's not closed, nor is it resolved, WSM brought up an accusation without evidence, I'll agree that the flameboard being deleted has probably erased a lot of evidence in said cases but, if the issue wasn't resolved, shouldn't the evidence have been kept?
It was kept, On the Flameboard.
I know i lost a number of things that i had bookmarked on the FB.
 
I don't mean kept on the flameboard, shouldn't they have been kept on peoples computers? Evidence shouldn't just be used and thrown away. It should be kept at easy access until the issue is resolved.
 
Lokkin said:
I don't mean kept on the flameboard, shouldn't they have been kept on peoples computers? Evidence shouldn't just be used and thrown away. It should be kept at easy access until the issue is resolved.
Why would it need to be kept elsewhere? About all that would be kept on a PC would be chat log screens. Much of it was links to other FB posts, posts on other sites, and input from other members.
 
But other FB threads aren't evidence, it just shows that he's done other things or other people have accused said person, chat logs are fairly decent evidence, as are witnesses.
 
Lokkin said:
But other FB threads aren't evidence, it just shows that he's done other things or other people have accused said person, chat logs are fairly decent evidence, as are witnesses.
other FB posts are corroberating (i know its wrong -_- too lazy to get my textbook and look it up) evidence. They set the stage for the person.
Example:
Situation1
PersonA stole from me!
Group: How do you know?
PersonA: He has my missing item!

Situation2
PersonA: He Stole from me!
Group: How do you know?
PersonA: He has my missing items, and he's been proven to have stolen from people before!
PersonsB+C+D: Yeah, he stole fom us. The threads are Here, Here, and Here.
 
Ok, I'll agree with that, but you should always have chat logs stored until it's resolved.
 
Back
Top