So the rumor is true!

[Blazeoffury]

I found Blazn speaking perfect English!! He goes under Kireforever on KI, has the same sig as he does here... Here's a link to a thread he posted in!

http://killingifrit.com/forums.php?m=posts&q=127923&d=30

 

[Windy]

In merits if your in a SH/+1 if you can not tank well quit your job mobs die to fast all ready so go into full DD gear.

"you're"
"too"

not to mention lack of punctuation/grammar issues.

If you DD in a osode your still stupid use a haub/+1 and the osode for WS as the sats are good 30% STR 30% DEX on Jin right? Switch your waj head for O hat and Hauby for osode on WS and you have the acc lost from haub on the O hat, and the +10 str and +10 dex for the Jin then switch back after the WS to waj head and Haub

"an"
"you're"
"stats"
and lack of punctuation/grammar issues.

FAR from perfect but better question.. who cares?:/

 

[Skaw]

Every once in a while he hits a readable sentence. But you know what they say. Put enough Monkeys infront of a typewriter and they'll produce Shakespeare.

 

[Juvenile]

In merits if your in a SH/+1 if you can not tank well quit your job mobs die to fast all ready so go into full DD gear.

Should be In merits if your in a SH/+1 and can not tank well quit your job. Mobs die to fast already so go into full DD gear.

who really cares it the internet =/

 

[Sharpe]

Should be In merits if your in a SH/+1 and can not tank well quit your job. Mobs die to fast already so go into full DD gear.

who really cares it the internet =/

No it shouldn't . You're not your. Also too not to.

 

[Reko]

No it shouldn't . You're not your. Also too not to.

"and can not tank well quit your job"

You're?
Really?

Ok then...

 

[Blabj]

In merits if your in a SH/+1 if you can not tank well quit your job mobs die to fast all ready so go into full DD gear.

Should be In merits if your in a SH/+1 and can not tank well quit your job. Mobs die to fast already so go into full DD gear.

who really cares it the internet =/

No it shouldn't . You're not your. Also too not to.

"and can not tank well quit your job"

You're?
Really?

Ok then...

Whilst meriting your job in a merit party, if you're in a Scorpion Harness [+1], and failing to tank to the best of your ability, you should quit your job. Mobs die too fast all ready so equip full DD gear.

This doesn't even belong in the good times forums anyways. It's verging on stalking Kire also, which I don't approve of very much. But I feel people could do with learning some grammar so I'll leave it. Maybe move it, where to however, you'll never know.

 

[Kire]

So to lazy to lock it but have enough time to do those quotes -_- i am not being your guest now xD

 

[Blabj]

So to lazy to lock it but have enough time to do those quotes -_- i am not being your guest now xD

Nah I just don't like being your go-to boy. I don't lock threads because you want me to.

 

[Romper]

Why do you rag on Kire for not being able to speak english well? Hell, most of you can barely speak English as is, and you choose to pick on someone because they speak it worse than you? God damn you all need lives... well maybe find it first then master that life so you don't turn back and start stalking Kire/Blazn and making fun of him for not typing well. You've never heard him talk in real life. Some people are just naturally bad typists. Not his fault he has clumzy hand syndrom now is it? Honestly who the hell cares get over it and stop crying "ZMG Blazn post! Letz find gramatical err0rz~"!

So... QCDN posters that hate on Kire, SUCK ON THAT! Romper out.

 

[Blazeoffury]

Romper you completely missed the point. He has proven time and time again he can type legibly <sp> but yet he doesn't do it very much at all, and a lot of the time it can take a while to just try and decode what he posts.

*Edit* I made the title wrong apparently. This thread wasn't meant to make fun of Kire/Blazn at all. It was more of an encouraging thread to get him to keep writing like that so people jump off his back for a little while.

 

[Mithe]

I've read this forum since just about when it came out. Some of you people need help, seriously.

It's hard to discuss without hurting feelings, but really, do everybody a favor that reads these forums and quit being stupid. This is directed at everybody.

Every forum has people that can't type for crap. I can read it. I know what he's posted in the past. Nobody really cares that he has bad grammar, and you're not witty for pointing it out for the however many times you and other people have.

I still enjoy browsing this forum but really, give me something worth reading, not this worthless schoolyard dribble. "YOO CNT SPEEL GUD HAH HAH!"

Consequently, I had to post because I've watched for something like a year or more while people constantly bash this person for their grammar. Enough is enough. It was justifiable during the prime of when stupid things were being done, but for god's sake, chill out. You may even say back to me "But stupid things are still being done!" I don't care. Spending a year of your own life hating on somebody for crappy grammar is just beyond sad. You personally may not do it religiously, but stop contributing. It's not cool, and while I do have the choice not to read it, I can still voice my opinion of everybody being grade A dumbasses for an extremely extended period of time over something so insanely miniscule.

 

[Kire]

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c259/blaznhotty/grammarnazi7ez.jpg

Thats what reminds me off these sort of posts =D

 

[Skaw]

The only typing problems I suffer are the occasional typo for some reason. I mean, I don't even know how/why they appear. I've been typing since I was 7, and I'm 22. I even took a typing class in high school because it was the easiest A ever. But, every once in a while, I just space out and typo it seems.

Ofcourse, I speak English pretty well. Not properly, but better than most of the United States.

Note: This post was to distinguish the difference between typing and speaking. Saying someone can't speak enligsh because of the way they type is like calling someone rich, because they have a million Korean Dong.

 

[Valoran]

Saying someone can't speak enligsh because of the way they type is like calling someone rich, because they have a million Korean Dong.

I'm not sure these two things are like one another whatsoever, as a matter of fact. Maybe it's like calling someone rich because they have a lot of gil? That might hold up the virtual world to real world aspect, as well as the virtual skill to real world skill aspect? What the analogy as presented does offer is ignorance of the relationship between the two on the part of the asserter, so perhaps that's good enough.

I just don't think that holds through, however, because the typing side of the analogy doesn't seem to claim that the person can't recognize good typing, just that they don't understand how it functions relative to speaking. But for that person to have a similar aptitude recognizing wealth in terms of Korean Dong, they'd have to know how much Dong is required to make one wealthy. The ignorance is coming from a different place.

But don't mind me . . . some people are grammar nazis, and I admit to being a bit of one . . . but at heart, I'm a "nazi" about logical structures, and analogies are some of the simplest and hardest of those.

Was the mt on "enligsh" intentional? ;D


Ok, edit:

Ok, sorry, I just had to take a moment to break down the logic on this:

Analogy 1:

"Person A claims typing ability of Person B reflects speaking ability of Person B = Person A claims 1 million Korean Dong held by Person B reflects Person B being 'rich.'"

Also implicit seems:

Inference 1:

"IF Person A can accurately rate typing ability of a Person B, THEN it is NOT the case that Person A has sufficient information to determine speaking ability of a Person B."

The problem comes when you apply Inference 1 to Analogy 1; the following relationship would have to exist for the analogy to be structurally sound:

Inference 2:

"IF Person A can accurately rate 1 million Korean Dong, THEN it is NOT the case that Person A has sufficient information to determine that Person B is 'rich.'"

Inference 2 does not seem accurate. If someone is able to accurately rate 1 million Korean Dong, they should be able to determine whether that makes a person 'rich' or not. This certainly depends on the use of the term "rate," but I feel it is as appropriate as possible for the left side of Analogy 1, and for it to be a structurally sound analogy, the right side must match. With any term, though, be it "rate" or something else, Person A must be assumed to be able to identify how "good" or "effective" 1 million Korean Dong is, and the field of potential purposes that can be logically imagined for money is fairly narrow. (Even if it's assumed to be useful for comfort or security, how well it does that -- and this is what Person A must be assumed to know -- is based on its value as 'riches' in general).

It would seem, then, that:

Statement 3:

"IF Person A can accurately rate 1 million Korean Dong, THEN Person A has sufficient information whether Person B who has 1 million Korean Dong is rich."

It would seem, then, that Analogy 1 breaks down, because Person A CAN say that the wealth in general of Person B can be determined by their possession of 1 million Korean Dong, and the analogy is therefore not structurally the same -- that is, analogous -- on both sides.

 

[Reauland]

But you know what they say. Put enough Monkeys infront of a typewriter and they'll produce Shakespeare.

And as God is my witness . . . I AM that monkey

 

[Tymon]

Doesn't look any different to me.

I personally don't think his grammar is that bad in most occasions. I've seen much worse, and from what I've gathered english is not his first language, so who cares.

 

[pakomen]

enligsh

ZOMG TYPOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

 

[Windy]

wan't

I'm sorry D: I couldn't help it. Skaw does alright and Kire speaks multiple languages. Let's see you all type as good as he does in languages other THAN english.

 

[pakomen]

こにちわ。

ぼく　は　パコメン　です。

よろしくおねがいします。

ビルのみたいな～。