Some cool names

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rappa said:
It's not Cix, lol. I was in pt with Cix less than a week ago. Good times.
Click to expand...

Honestly, you could put any name where Cix's is and who couldn't tell it was Vang. Vang has had Cix's qcdn info for a long time iirc, and Cix generally couldn't care enough to come here.
 
Crosis said:
Get outta here fag, you're the biggest joke here. It's one thing to be a cheater, its another thing to be a self-righteous ass (me!) and laughing at those who do cheat. You are both which makes you a big ass hypocrite. Now continue the butt sex with Cix some more plx and go byebye :)
Click to expand...


Um Vang doesnt bot, he camps on PS2 and prefers it, his claim rate is pretty damn good as well on ps2 since fafnir loads faster on screen. But he does promote botting so take that for what it's worth. The only cheating we know of is he used fleetool for about a month to get to DA faster, and he removed darters, then gave up on PC altogethor since the lag sucked in DA.

Also wasn't it stated he was a hypocrite when he joined up with JPs a year ago and everyone busted his balls and told him he was going to ninjalot a ridill and never go etc etc? Even though he is still in the shell and is one of the leaders in attendance. Pretty much the only NA besides Rolliefingaz left in that shell. Pretty sure he showed up and admitted he was wrong for flaming JPs all those years and took all of the flames like a man. Too bad you guys all can't do the same thing.

Now its "his" turn to call all of you the hypocrites of huge proportions weeeee!
 
Uzor said:
I just want to see Decidence's response
Click to expand...

Ish050228155022a.jpg

Ish050228155642a.jpg


Probably something like this.
 
how can deci die to argus when he's wearing a black cloak(meaning he's a lv70 blm?!)

bot that works even when afk?
 
Cix said:
Your sig is the best. Necrosis is a God.
Click to expand...

As if I needed further proof that this was Vang. Anyways, that makes 2 accounts reviewed in just 1 thread, why not bring on some more.
 
There was that picture proving he botted when he denied all of that!

Also how hilarious Cix is banned after he responds to Neo's retarded comment. Neo aren't you a mod? Why would you ban Cix for flaming in the flameboard? You have no proof that it isn't Cix.
 
Khidir said:
how can deci die to argus when he's wearing a black cloak(meaning he's a lv70 blm?!)

bot that works even when afk?
Click to expand...

That's typically what they're for, hence the afk fisherman.
 
Arctyrael said:
As if I needed further proof that this was Vang. Anyways, that makes 2 accounts reviewed in just 1 thread, why not bring on some more.
Click to expand...

This is bad news for Kaizen. Vang posting was adding more and more credibility to their account each time he said something. Now that Vang's gone, actual discussion can continue again.
 
Khidir said:
how can deci die to argus when he's wearing a black cloak(meaning he's a lv70 blm?!)

bot that works even when afk?
Click to expand...
A bot just automatically spams your claiming macro; you don't have to pay attention or be present for it to be going off one you turned it on. That's how bots are really obvious, if someone claims and just stands there(especially if they provoke every 30 seconds) then they've claimed while being afk and had to have used a bot.
 
Bajaratt said:
A bot just automatically spams your claiming macro; you don't have to pay attention or be present for it to be going off one you turned it on. That's how bots are really obvious, if someone claims and just stands there(especially if they provoke every 30 seconds) then they've claimed while being afk and had to have used a bot.
Click to expand...

lol Heidebot was defeated by Fafnir.
 
Necrosis said:
There was that picture proving he botted when he denied all of that!

Also how hilarious Cix is banned after he responds to Neo's retarded comment. Neo aren't you a mod? Why would you ban Cix for flaming in the flameboard? You have no proof that it isn't Cix.
Click to expand...

if you'd read "crime and punishment" and stop assuming-- it wasn't me. but it was being researched well before the post towards me anyways.
 
Arctyrael said:
As if I needed further proof that this was Vang. Anyways, that makes 2 accounts reviewed in just 1 thread, why not bring on some more.
Click to expand...


My apologies Neo.

I still didn't see the proof though.
 
well then, it can just stay banned then...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top