I'm just going to clarify something.
To be fair, it was Kelyon who brought it up *first* which is what Jya said. In the post right before the one you quoted, but that doesn't even begin to describe most peoples problem with Jyakotsu.
To be fair, one has a choice to respond to what another has to say. Just like what I'm doing.
To be fair, if you don't like what you just read, you don't have to respond to that person's particular post.
In my eyes, you are just as guilty by getting involved in an arguement as starting one.
This makes me believe that both Kelyon and Jyakotsu are both in the wrong.
Kelyon says alot of things (mostly useless stuff) and puts in a spin to make his argument sound more...convincing I should say.
True he may have started it but to actually take the bait is just as bad.
Another person who feels the same way as Jyakotsu in terms of people. I feel its really impractical to just put some people on ignore. They could post some useful information somewhere down the line that you really need, but because you have them on ignore you would never see it. I prefer the much less realistic approach, of just try not to act like a complete idiot, and no one has a problem. Generally the people on QCDN abide by this so it works out, but never will it totally work.
I think I may not have been clear.
I'm not talking about the "Ignore" feature.
You can read the posts and not respond to them.
Or you can just not read them and skip to the next post.
I'm talking about not responding to what every single thing a person says. I'm talking about not insulting/stalking whatever that person says just because they offended/insulted/dislike you.
You don't have to read what they apparently have to say all the friggin time.
I don't have anyone on my ignore list, and quite frankly there are some people I do dislike simply because they just put in one-liners just because they want to and have nothing to contribute to the actual thread.
Sometimes those same people do bring up valid points as well so I guess it evens out.