- Joined
- Nov 2, 2004
- Messages
- 3,995
- Age
- 35
- Location
- Memphis, TN
- Website
- www.phuxed.com
- Nation Banner
- Main Job
- Secondary Job
- Third Job
- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- Linkshell
- Integral, Origin
- FFXI
- Tymon
The theme of this thread is not "Square Enix is off its rocker." By now, you've already heard countless arguments running in that vein and are probably pretty sick of them. The theme of this letter is "Square Enix would feel an intense schadenfreude if its ultimata made me go crazy." Here's my side of the story: It is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Square Enix's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "How long shall there continue infernal low-lifes to vend and uncivilized scapegraces to gulp so low a piece of deconstructionism as Square Enix's doctrines?" To answer that question, we need first to consider Square Enix's thought process, which generally takes the following form: (1) Square Enix has the authority to issue licenses for practicing onanism, so (2) corrupt malcontents (especially the acrimonious type) are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. Therefore, (3) it is a perpetual victim of injustice and thus, (4) it is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. As you can see, Square Enix's reasoning makes no sense, which leads me to believe that it may reconstitute society on the basis of arrested development and envious malevolence right after it reads this letter. Let it. Quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "transubstantiationalist", I will prevent the production of a new crop of larcenous perjurers while remaining true to those beliefs, ideals, and aspirations we hold most dear. Square Enix does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when it says that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all completely justified, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.
I'll go over that again: My opinions are the obverse of Square Enix's. More than that, if Square Enix opened its eyes, it'd realize that it can plausibly be surmised that it is so tied up in its personal dreams that it is oblivious to what is happening in the world around it. Are you still with me? Disgusting losers, empty-headed firebrands, and Square Enix's hirelings are totally and utterly fungible, but that's really beside the point.
Square Enix can blame me for the influx of peevish publishers of hate literature if it makes it feel better, but it won't help its cause any. I and Square Enix part company when it comes to the issue of separatism. It feels that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication, while I insist that if I have a bias, it is only against directionless, cankered skinheads who pit the haves against the have-nots. Square Enix has commented that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as its comment is lacking in common sense. I need your help if I'm ever to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior.
Individually, Square Enix's stances cause the destruction of human ambition and joy. But linked together, Square Enix's bait-and-switch tactics could easily lock people up for reading the "wrong" classes of books or listening to the "wrong" types of music. I'm no expert, but it seems to me that in Square Enix's half-measures, neopaganism is witting and unremitting, raving and polyloquent. It revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that it may be generating. Who is behind the decline of our civilization? The culprit responsible is not the Illuminati, not the Insiders, not the Humanists, not even the Communists. No, the decline of our civilization is attributable primarily to Square Enix.
If Square Enix isn't unconscionable, I don't know who is. My intention here is not just to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose, but also to reinforce what is best in people. While I have no proof that Square Enix's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to its vices and the size of its mouth, you should still believe me, as I suppose it's predictable, though terribly sad, that uppity casuists with stronger voices than minds would revert to delusional behavior. But I can't follow Square Enix's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that the basal lie that underlies all of its dangerous analects is that it can override nature. Translation: It is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that Square Enix should be even slightly inconvenienced. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that we must punish Square Enix for its raucous fairy tales. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on its jaded warnings. You must be the one to answer the foolhardy paper-pushers who cashier anyone who tries to ring the bells of truth. And you must inform your fellow man that Square Enix can justify anything that brings it a profit. It vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would, because it will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it lead us, lemminglike, over the precipice of self-destruction. At least putting up with another Square Enix hissy fit is easier than convincing Square Enix's secret agents that if Square Enix's attendants had even an ounce of integrity, they would launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of terrorism.
While Square Enix has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever it wants about antiheroism, the acid test for its "kinder, gentler" new circulars should be, "Do they still pull the levers of colonialism and oil the gears of absenteeism?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that I have a hard time trying to reason with people who remain calm when they see Square Enix seek temporary tactical alliances with unctuous geeks in order to distract attention from more important issues. In order to express our concerns about Square Enix's voluble snow jobs, we must resolve our disputes without violence. And that's just the first step. Remember, some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with pouty good-for-nothings on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to saddle the economy with crippling debt. Take, for example, self-satisfied, brutish duffers. Now look at Square Enix. If you don't believe there's a similarity, then consider that it says it's going to transform our whole society to suit its own gutless interests in the coming days. Good old Square Enix. It just loves to open its mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how antihumanist they sound.
Did Square Enix get dropped on its head when it was young, or did it take massive doses of drugs to believe that it understands the difference between civilization and savagery? There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: It is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Square Enix's laughable theories. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and give peace a chance. Given what I know about savage devil-worshippers, I can say with confidence that Square Enix keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. The purpose of this deception may be to treat anyone who doesn't agree with it to a torrent of vitriol and vilification. Or maybe the purpose is to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Oh what a tangled web Square Enix weaves when first it practices to deceive.
Sometimes it seems the most maladroit insurrectionists you'll ever see are like a farmer who, in the spring, would work the ground, plant seeds, fertilize, and cultivate the ground for a period of time. And then, perhaps, he decides to go off to Hawaii and have a good time and forget the reason he planted the crop in the first place. Well, a farmer wouldn't do that. But Square Enix would suck up to puerile finks if it got the chance.
It's not just that I, not being one of the many horny sciolists of this world, regard Square Enix the way I would the sort of stinking filth I might have to clean off my boots after a careless walk in a dog kennel, but also that it has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to glorify yawping killjoys. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that when the war against reason is backed by a large cadre of wanton boeotians, the results are even more myopic. (Actually, its bromides are contrary to international human rights and humanitarian standards but that's not important now.) What I want to document now is that Square Enix talks a lot about phallocentrism and how wonderful it is. However, it's never actually defined what it means. How can it argue for something it's never defined? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Square Enix lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of its existence, I will restate what I said before, for its sake: My position is that seeing it fragment the nation into politically disharmonious units is a nauseating and disgusting spectacle. Square Enix, in contrast, argues that moonstruck guttersnipes are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Square Enix. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for it to admit that it doubtlessly believes that it acts in the public interest. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is it living in? In other words, why does it always have to be such a party pooper? If you need help in answering that question, you may note that its nostrums are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're thoroughly irresponsible, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how it is in its nature to be a deceiver and a destroyer and a bloodsucker. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also champion the force of goodness against the greed of the most ruthless lackwits I've ever seen. I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Square Enix's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now.
My argument gets a little complicated here. Craven and footling, Square Enix's arguments resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that Square Enix likes to compare its tractates to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. Not only have the most snivelling popinjays you'll ever see decided to glorify their demands by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their assertions are being debated as though they were actually reasonable. In theory, Square Enix's vituperations are a quick-fix detour, a placebo aimed at surface symptoms, and an excuse to promote communism's traits as normative values to be embraced. But in reality, we should not concern ourselves with Square Enix's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Square Enix's opinion is that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that crime unpunished is crime rewarded, and everyone with half a brain understands that. Stand with me, be honest with me, and help me reinforce notions of positive self esteem, and together we'll perform noble deeds. We'll halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction. I'm counting on you. Thanks for reading this.
I'll go over that again: My opinions are the obverse of Square Enix's. More than that, if Square Enix opened its eyes, it'd realize that it can plausibly be surmised that it is so tied up in its personal dreams that it is oblivious to what is happening in the world around it. Are you still with me? Disgusting losers, empty-headed firebrands, and Square Enix's hirelings are totally and utterly fungible, but that's really beside the point.
Square Enix can blame me for the influx of peevish publishers of hate literature if it makes it feel better, but it won't help its cause any. I and Square Enix part company when it comes to the issue of separatism. It feels that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication, while I insist that if I have a bias, it is only against directionless, cankered skinheads who pit the haves against the have-nots. Square Enix has commented that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as its comment is lacking in common sense. I need your help if I'm ever to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior.
Individually, Square Enix's stances cause the destruction of human ambition and joy. But linked together, Square Enix's bait-and-switch tactics could easily lock people up for reading the "wrong" classes of books or listening to the "wrong" types of music. I'm no expert, but it seems to me that in Square Enix's half-measures, neopaganism is witting and unremitting, raving and polyloquent. It revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that it may be generating. Who is behind the decline of our civilization? The culprit responsible is not the Illuminati, not the Insiders, not the Humanists, not even the Communists. No, the decline of our civilization is attributable primarily to Square Enix.
If Square Enix isn't unconscionable, I don't know who is. My intention here is not just to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose, but also to reinforce what is best in people. While I have no proof that Square Enix's virtue and brains are inversely proportionate to its vices and the size of its mouth, you should still believe me, as I suppose it's predictable, though terribly sad, that uppity casuists with stronger voices than minds would revert to delusional behavior. But I can't follow Square Enix's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that the basal lie that underlies all of its dangerous analects is that it can override nature. Translation: It is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that Square Enix should be even slightly inconvenienced. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that we must punish Square Enix for its raucous fairy tales. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on its jaded warnings. You must be the one to answer the foolhardy paper-pushers who cashier anyone who tries to ring the bells of truth. And you must inform your fellow man that Square Enix can justify anything that brings it a profit. It vehemently denies that, of course. But it obviously would, because it will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it lead us, lemminglike, over the precipice of self-destruction. At least putting up with another Square Enix hissy fit is easier than convincing Square Enix's secret agents that if Square Enix's attendants had even an ounce of integrity, they would launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of terrorism.
While Square Enix has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever it wants about antiheroism, the acid test for its "kinder, gentler" new circulars should be, "Do they still pull the levers of colonialism and oil the gears of absenteeism?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that I have a hard time trying to reason with people who remain calm when they see Square Enix seek temporary tactical alliances with unctuous geeks in order to distract attention from more important issues. In order to express our concerns about Square Enix's voluble snow jobs, we must resolve our disputes without violence. And that's just the first step. Remember, some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with pouty good-for-nothings on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to saddle the economy with crippling debt. Take, for example, self-satisfied, brutish duffers. Now look at Square Enix. If you don't believe there's a similarity, then consider that it says it's going to transform our whole society to suit its own gutless interests in the coming days. Good old Square Enix. It just loves to open its mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how antihumanist they sound.
Did Square Enix get dropped on its head when it was young, or did it take massive doses of drugs to believe that it understands the difference between civilization and savagery? There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: It is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Square Enix's laughable theories. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and give peace a chance. Given what I know about savage devil-worshippers, I can say with confidence that Square Enix keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. The purpose of this deception may be to treat anyone who doesn't agree with it to a torrent of vitriol and vilification. Or maybe the purpose is to blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Oh what a tangled web Square Enix weaves when first it practices to deceive.
Sometimes it seems the most maladroit insurrectionists you'll ever see are like a farmer who, in the spring, would work the ground, plant seeds, fertilize, and cultivate the ground for a period of time. And then, perhaps, he decides to go off to Hawaii and have a good time and forget the reason he planted the crop in the first place. Well, a farmer wouldn't do that. But Square Enix would suck up to puerile finks if it got the chance.
It's not just that I, not being one of the many horny sciolists of this world, regard Square Enix the way I would the sort of stinking filth I might have to clean off my boots after a careless walk in a dog kennel, but also that it has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to glorify yawping killjoys. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that when the war against reason is backed by a large cadre of wanton boeotians, the results are even more myopic. (Actually, its bromides are contrary to international human rights and humanitarian standards but that's not important now.) What I want to document now is that Square Enix talks a lot about phallocentrism and how wonderful it is. However, it's never actually defined what it means. How can it argue for something it's never defined? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Square Enix lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of its existence, I will restate what I said before, for its sake: My position is that seeing it fragment the nation into politically disharmonious units is a nauseating and disgusting spectacle. Square Enix, in contrast, argues that moonstruck guttersnipes are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Square Enix. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for it to admit that it doubtlessly believes that it acts in the public interest. What kind of Humpty-Dumpty world is it living in? In other words, why does it always have to be such a party pooper? If you need help in answering that question, you may note that its nostrums are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're thoroughly irresponsible, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how it is in its nature to be a deceiver and a destroyer and a bloodsucker. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also champion the force of goodness against the greed of the most ruthless lackwits I've ever seen. I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Square Enix's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now.
My argument gets a little complicated here. Craven and footling, Square Enix's arguments resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that Square Enix likes to compare its tractates to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. Not only have the most snivelling popinjays you'll ever see decided to glorify their demands by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their assertions are being debated as though they were actually reasonable. In theory, Square Enix's vituperations are a quick-fix detour, a placebo aimed at surface symptoms, and an excuse to promote communism's traits as normative values to be embraced. But in reality, we should not concern ourselves with Square Enix's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Square Enix's opinion is that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that crime unpunished is crime rewarded, and everyone with half a brain understands that. Stand with me, be honest with me, and help me reinforce notions of positive self esteem, and together we'll perform noble deeds. We'll halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction. I'm counting on you. Thanks for reading this.
