- Joined
- Aug 10, 2004
- Messages
- 10,285
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Sweden
- Nation Banner

- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Fenrir
- Linkshell
- Avaritas
- FFXIV
- Uzor
My argument wasn't what happened after you buy them. Its the fact that while yes, both are anonymous, its a play of statistics. When the chance of buying an autumnstone from an RMT are much greater then that of buying another item from an RMT, you can't compare them. In the same way you can't compare a flower to a tree just because both grow.Blazeoffury said:I'm not talking about what happens after you buy them, absolutely no one is. That isn't even the arguement at hand. I know there are less autumnstones, and those actually disappear upon each use. But we are talking about how there is no way to know who you are buying from albeit AH or bazaar. Either place knowing the person whom you are going to purchase the said item from is impossible. What happens after it is bought is irrelevent to this arguement.
If autumnstones were sellable on the AH, it would be considered just as bad to buy them from the AH as it would be from bazaars. I do believe no one argued that point. But the chance of buying a RMT sold o. kote is much smaller then that of a RMT sold autumnstone, which have been the whole argument about why the AH can't be considered bazaaring autumnstones.
I only mentioned what happends after you buy items to show that autumnstones dissapear upon use, but o. kotes stay on the server.