The GM bankruptcy

Dejavu

Quis custodiet ipsos cust
Adventurer
Joined
Nov 8, 2004
Messages
2,555
Age
42
Location
somewhere...
Main Job
Bard-Male
Secondary Job
Monk-Male
Third Job
Thief-Male
Server
Quetzalcoatl
FFXI
Dejavu
FFXIV
Won't play this game
I have a good feeling about this one i really do...

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/business/01deese.html?_r=2&ref=business):

The 31-Year-Old in Charge of Dismantling G.M.

By DAVID E. SANGER
Published: May 31, 2009

WASHINGTON — It is not every 31-year-old who, in a first government job, finds himself dismantling General Motors and rewriting the rules of American capitalism.

But that, in short, is the job description for Brian Deese, a not-quite graduate of Yale Law School who had never set foot in an automotive assembly plant until he took on his nearly unseen role in remaking the American automotive industry.

Nor, for that matter, had he given much thought to what ailed an industry that had been in decline ever since he was born. A bit laconic and looking every bit the just-out-of-graduate-school student adjusting to life in the West Wing — “he’s got this beard that appears and disappears,” says Steven Rattner, one of the leaders of President Obama’s automotive task force — Mr. Deese was thrown into the auto industry’s maelstrom as soon the election-night parties ended.

“There was a time between Nov. 4 and mid-February when I was the only full-time member of the auto task force,” Mr. Deese, a special assistant to the president for economic policy, acknowledged recently as he hurried between his desk at the White House and the Treasury building next door. “It was a little scary.”

But now, according to those who joined him in the middle of his crash course about the automakers’ downward spiral, he has emerged as one of the most influential voices in what may become President Obama’s biggest experiment yet in federal economic intervention.

While far more prominent members of the administration are making the big decisions about Detroit, it is Mr. Deese who is often narrowing their options.

A month ago, when the administration was divided over whether to support Fiat’s bid to take over much of Chrysler, it was Mr. Deese who spoke out strongly against simply letting the company go into liquidation, according to several people who were present for the debate.

“Brian grasps both the economics and the politics about as quickly as I’ve seen anyone do this,” said Lawrence H. Summers, the head of the National Economic Council who is not known for being patient whenever he believes an analysis is sub-par — or disagrees with his own. “And there he was in the Roosevelt Room, speaking up vigorously to make the point that the costs we were going to incur giving Fiat a chance were no greater than some of the hidden costs of liquidation.”

Mr. Deese was not the only one favoring the Fiat deal, but his lengthy memorandum on how liquidation would increase Medicaid costs, unemployment insurance and municipal bankruptcies ended the debate. The administration supported the deal, and it seems likely to become a reality on Monday, if a federal judge handling the high-speed bankruptcy proceeding approves the sale of Chrysler’s best assets to the Italian carmaker.

Mr. Deese’s role is unusual for someone who is neither a formally trained economist nor a business school graduate, and who never spent much time flipping through the endless studies about the future of the American and Japanese auto industries.

He lives a dual life these days. He starts the day at a desk wedged just outside of Mr. Summers’s office, where he can hear what young members of the economic team have come to know as “the Summers bellow.” From there, he can make it quickly to the press office to help devise explanations for why taxpayers are spending more than $50 billion on what polls show is a very unpopular bailout of the auto industry.

Several times a day he speed-walks to Treasury, taking a shortcut through the tunnel under the colonnade, near the kitchens. The other day he talked about how sharply perceptions of the industry’s future changed after Mr. Obama’s election.

“At the first meeting with Rick Wagoner,” he said, referring to G.M.’s recently deposed chief executive, “they were in a very different place. He said publicly that bankruptcy was not a viable option. It’s been a long process getting everyone to look at the options differently.”

In fact, from before Inauguration Day, few in Mr. Obama’s circle saw any other choice. Every time Mr. Deese ran the numbers on G.M. and Chrysler, he came back with the now-obvious conclusion that neither was a viable business, and that their plans to revive themselves did not address the erosion of their revenues. But it took the support of Mr. Rattner and Ron Bloom, senior advisers to the task force charged with restructuring the automobile industry, to help turn Mr. Deese’s positions into policy.

“The president’s instruction to us was that we had to come up with a solution that would work on a commercial basis, that didn’t involve indefinite federal financing,” Mr. Deese said. “But we didn’t want liquidation, which would have even worse effects. So the question was how do you design a very substantial restructuring, and do it fast.”

Mr. Deese’s route to the auto table at the White House was anything but a straight line. He is the son of a political science professor at Boston College (his father) and an engineer who works in renewable energy (his mother). He grew up in the Boston suburb of Belmont and attended Middlebury College in Vermont. He went to Washington to work on aid issues and was quickly hired by Nancy Birdsall, a widely respected authority on the effectiveness of international aid and the founder of the Center for Global Development.

But he wanted to learn domestic issues as well, and soon ended up working as an assistant for Gene Sperling, who 17 years ago in the Clinton White House played a similar role as economic policy prodigy. Eventually, Mr. Deese headed to Yale for his law degree. But his e-mail box was constantly filled with messages from friends in Washington who were signing up to work for the Obama or Hillary Rodham Clinton campaigns. Mr. Deese chose Senator Clinton’s.

“He was pretty quickly functioning as the top economic policy staffer through her campaign,” Mr. Sperling said. “He could blend the policy needs and the political needs pretty seamlessly.” On the day that the Clinton campaign ended, Mr. Deese left her concession speech and received a message on his BlackBerry from a friend in the Obama campaign urging him to sign on immediately to Mr. Obama’s team.

He resumed his policy work there, and found himself stuck in Chicago — unable to fly to Washington with his dog — as the economic crisis deepened. Finally, one night, he decided to get into his car with his dog and just started driving back to Washington. Tired, he pulled over to catch some sleep in the car.

“I slept in the parking lot of the G. M. plant in Lordstown, Ohio,” he recalled. The giant plant, opened during G.M.’s heyday in the mid-1960s, is where the Pontiac G5 is produced. Under the plan Mr. Deese worked on when he arrived in Washington, Pontiac will disappear.

“I guess that was prophetic,” he said, shaking his head.

So.. Let me check my facts on this one...

He has no degree even a 4 year let alone a post graduate...
He has no experience in economics or the auto industry...
And he is the one who is in charge of dismantling the biggest bankruptcy in history...

I've got a good feeling about this one. :facepalm:
 
the people with degrees and exp. got us into this. maybe he has common sense, which GM greatly lacks.

who keeps building SUVs when the gas price keeps going up? and then who builds the worlds most ugly "hybrid" when CA state laws make you... GM was run by idiots.
 
the people with degrees and exp. got us into this. maybe he has common sense, which GM greatly lacks.

who keeps building SUVs when the gas price keeps going up? and then who builds the worlds most ugly "hybrid" when CA state laws make you... GM was run by idiots.

Yea like I said to Deja, maybe being green and not having any selfish digs on the industry to begin with will be a blessing.

He has no stakes and was practically thrown in the lions den, sometimes these things work out for the best.

As far as the general understanding for the industry goes, I doubt it'll take him long to catch on. It's the financial re-structuring that'll be the most prudent of steps, and lets hope he goes into it intelligently.
 
Yea i agree with the fact that it is a job that few other people would want and there is a reason for that... you can only go up if you start from the very bottom. Hmm... whats the term im looking for...

scapegoat.jpg


I think this is the one.
 
Yea i agree with the fact that it is a job that few other people would want and there is a reason for that... you can only go up if you start from the very bottom. Hmm... whats the term im looking for...

scapegoat.jpg


I think this is the one.

That's a very good point.

I thought this very similar a term to what they elected Obama for.

Another reason I hope he does well over his term, because I feel a lot of the reason he was elected was to be the person to focus the negative attention Bush caused. Your scapegoat.

I really don't understand the car industry though. As far as the full affect it has on our economy. I'm sure it's massive, I just don't have the full picture.
 
I disagree i think that bush is getting scapegoated for a lot of the stuff that Obama is currently causing although he is responsible for 10x as many problems as well. I think Obama was elected because he campaigned on the principles of hope and change which is about all the US people wanted. He didn't run against McCain, he ran against Bush and McCain was just there.

Bush has become the Scapegoat for the republican party which is trying their best to rebuild after getting spanked last election cycle following the failed policies of the last 8 years. But this aside is not really important to the article at hand.

There is no way that you can convince me that someone with that type of experience is the most qualified for the job.
 
Another reason I hope he does well over his term, because I feel a lot of the reason he was elected was to be the person to focus the negative attention Bush caused. Your scapegoat.

I really don't understand the car industry though. As far as the full affect it has on our economy. I'm sure it's massive, I just don't have the full picture.

Are you Kidding? Yes, I'm sure that the people went into the polls and thought to themselves, "You know, I think I'll vote for Obama because I think that he will make a wonderful scapegoat". I'm going to be cynical here and say that people probably voted for him because he liked his policies........

Anyway, if the auto industry goes belly up, we are in serious trouble. The amount of people that are employed by not only the makers directly, but their suppliers as well, is a very large number. You have that many people suddenly become unemployed and there won't be a ripple effect through the economy, probably more like a tsunami....
 
There is no way that you can convince me that someone with that type of experience is the most qualified for the job.

Oh I fully agree he's certainly not the most qualified! He's so very green.

What I'm thinking is many of the qualified and over-qualified individuals that would have happily taken this responsibility on would have been rotten choices.

I'm picturing the selfish gloat head business men/women who DO know the industry and would milk it for all it's worth.

He's in there now, let him do his best. Like I said, it may be a blessing to have a fresh face. He goes into this without preconceived notions and no past experiences to weight his forward thinking.

A good selling line for introduction to an industry with little to no experience is 'without being overly experienced in this field I can be molded to fullfill this role to your ideal'.

Are you Kidding? Yes, I'm sure that the people went into the polls and thought to themselves, "You know, I think I'll vote for Obama because I think that he will make a wonderful scapegoat". I'm going to be cynical here and say that people probably voted for him because he liked his policies........

Relax, I was just saying. Shit within a month or so I saw happening exactly what I expected.
 
Last edited:
Clarification:

Fourth biggest bankruptcy in history, behind Lehman Brothers, Washington Mutual, and WorldCom.

Furthermore:

I could care less of the age of the person heading it up. If they do well and do it right, power to him.

Otherwise, the bankruptcy is more of the economy being on the rag, and it's probably good for everyone in the long run.

[opinion]
 
Last edited:
Clarification:

Fourth biggest bankruptcy in history, behind Lehman Brothers, Washington Mutual, and WorldCom.

eh.. meant to say "one of" the largest... but that wasnt really the point anyways... lol
 
“He was pretty quickly functioning as the top economic policy staffer through her campaign,” Mr. Sperling said. “He could blend the policy needs and the political needs pretty seamlessly.” On the day that the Clinton campaign ended, Mr. Deese left her concession speech and received a message on his BlackBerry from a friend in the Obama campaign urging him to sign on immediately to Mr. Obama’s team.

“Brian grasps both the economics and the politics about as quickly as I’ve seen anyone do this,” said Lawrence H. Summers, the head of the National Economic Council who is not known for being patient whenever he believes an analysis is sub-par — or disagrees with his own.

Every time Mr. Deese ran the numbers on G.M. and Chrysler, he came back with the now-obvious conclusion that neither was a viable business, and that their plans to revive themselves did not address the erosion of their revenues.

Seems like he is ahead of the curve on a lot of this stuff....I mean, this article is hardly bashing him, more marveling at what he is doing with his lack of a true background. I don't know the guy obviously, as neither do you, but seems more like a prodigy-like personality than a scapegoat. Hes clearly left a great impression on everyone hes worked with.

At least hes getting results lol, unlike the Poly Sci student from Georgetown who was put in charge of the traffic coordination of Baghdad...
 
Back
Top