This isn't a flamebait?

Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Kelyon

Catamite
Adventurer
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
3,906
Age
37
Location
Baltimore Maryland
Linkshell
TheSlayers/NT
Jamal's Sig said:
[As I commanded in big bold letters via PM with Jamal when he was explaining that rating me down in a thread he started isn't actually stalking, but utilizing the forum's tools, Sig Nerfed for height violation. -Arctyrael January 25, 2008]
Click to expand...

Do you really see this as a appropriate thing to say in someone's signature? Why not just put the standard message. Is this how you want to reflect the administration of the site?
 
Kelyon said:
Do you really see this as a appropriate thing to say in someone's signature? Why not just put the standard message. Is this how you want to reflect the administration of the site?
Click to expand...

Your sig is now too large. :P
 
Kelyon said:
Do you really see this as a appropriate thing to say in someone's signature? Why not just put the standard message. Is this how you want to reflect the administration of the site?
Click to expand...

Really? Do you have nothing better to do than complain about everything the mods do?
 
Begen said:
Careful what you say, don't anger it.
Click to expand...

Yeah, his lips might be wrapped around your cock next Pasq.

Watch out! :O

/em steals Begen away before Kelyon gets to him too.

MINE!
 
He's right though. It's flamebait, and not really appropriate for a mod.
 
Everyone is entitled to free speech regarding the mod staff. This is more a way for everyone to know why his current signature is gone at least. ;)
 
Miros said:
This is more a way for everyone to know why his current signature is gone at least. ;)
Click to expand...

By that logic, doesn't that mean a mod is allowed to edit out any inappropriate material and the edit can say anything the mods want, simply because it's letting people know that the person broke some rule?

That's...uh...no. =/
 
What you see in Jamal's sig, is a twisted representation of the actual PM discourse. He can leave it though, I don't care. Its what he gets for having 3 quotes and a 7" tall sig, all after what had to be the 3rd sig nerf. I should clarify, it was Jamal that edited in the commentary -- it was a standard nerf.

At best, my reaction to it is "meh."
 
Kelyon said:
Do you really see this as a appropriate thing to say in someone's signature? Why not just put the standard message. Is this how you want to reflect the administration of the site?
Click to expand...

Kelyon's Signature said:
Do you really see this as a appropriate thing to say in someone's signature? Why not just put the standard message. Is this how you want to reflect the administration of the site?
Click to expand...

Have you answered your own question with a "yes"?
 
Mishaela said:
By that logic, doesn't that mean a mod is allowed to edit out any inappropriate material and the edit can say anything the mods want, simply because it's letting people know that the person broke some rule?

That's...uh...no. =/
Click to expand...

Miros knew it was Jamal that had placed the commentary in his own signature. I apologize for the lack of information. It is however within Jamal's right, to use his signature as a means of communication over just simply posting.

So no, Miros is not endorsing that we can edit out offensive material to add a relative commentary on rule breaking.
 
Arctyrael said:
Miros knew it was Jamal that had placed the commentary in his own signature. I apologize for the lack of information. It is however within Jamal's right, to use his signature as a means of communication over just simply posting.

So no, Miros is not endorsing that we can edit out offensive material to add a relative commentary on rule breaking.
Click to expand...

Sorry if Jamal really did edit how the original sig nerf appeared, I'm a bit slow on the uptake at times. Perhaps you guys should go back to the old signerf.jpg or whatever it was that used to be on the site?
 
Arctyrael said:
Miros knew it was Jamal that had placed the commentary in his own signature. I apologize for the lack of information. It is however within Jamal's right, to use his signature as a means of communication over just simply posting.

So no, Miros is not endorsing that we can edit out offensive material to add a relative commentary on rule breaking.
Click to expand...

Mishaela said:
STOP SPAMMING THE FORUM.

<3
Click to expand...

I edited this in just for you Mish:
spam.jpg
 
Mishaela said:
By that logic, doesn't that mean a mod is allowed to edit out any inappropriate material and the edit can say anything the mods want, simply because it's letting people know that the person broke some rule?

That's...uh...no. =/
Click to expand...

Whoops, totally read this situation in the opposite way. <_<; My bad!
 
edit:

1. whoosh

2. misread

edit2:

This not-posting thing must be killing Jam lol, why bother keeping tabs on him Kelyon, if all he does is add stuff to his sig and not post?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top