Valkyrs

Arien said:
Please read before you make comments.





At which point did I start blaming them for my LS robbing them? Whatever that is supposed to mean.


I am. Im wondering if you are. Attitudes like your's and skaw's, implying
multiple different attitudes. Where's skaws attitude would be that they dont belong in sky. Your's would be that they fucked up and only have themselves to blame for having their ulli stolen.

Arien said:
1. Don't overnuke - you screwed up, pulled hate and fucked up the whole situation, only blame yourself.

What is it that they can blame themselves for if it isnt for having their ulli
stolen by your ls?
 
Firestreak said:
Why don't you bold the whole sentence? Meh forget it. With stupid fucks like you, and Yanzi shouting how his LS can do whatever they want at every argument because there's crime in Aruba, I don't see how you guys can be such fucking snobs. You're too damn stupid to be snobs. Snobs are supposed to be smart.

Ehh.. whatever, I'm out.. for now.

I bolded the part of importance so simple minded jackasses such as yourself could comprehend what is being stressed here. Figured out that your little comment was wrong eh? Calling people names and bailing out now would appear to be the smart thing for you. I'd agree with that.

And uh....I do believe that you calling ANYBODY a snob would be a serious case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Mr. I'vedonethisbeforeyousothereforeIknowmoreabouteverything :nono:

You're too easy Fire. Please say within your bounds. The kiddie game is at http://www.nick.com. Things might be a little more around your level there.
 
Caerloc said:
What is it that they can blame themselves for if it isnt for having their ulli
stolen by your ls?

Uhhh...what? Please make some sense with what you are trying to get across. It's hard to respond to gibberish.
 
Arien said:
1. Don't overnuke - you screwed up, pulled hate and fucked up the whole situation, only blame yourself
[/URL]


Right here.
What is it they can blame themselves for?

And dont ignore the rest of my prior post.
 
Firestreak said:
Why don't you bold the whole sentence? Meh forget it. With stupid fucks like you, and Yanzi shouting how his LS can do whatever they want at every argument because there's crime in Aruba, I don't see how you guys can be such fucking snobs. You're too damn stupid to be snobs. Snobs are supposed to be smart.

Ehh.. whatever, I'm out.. for now.

there goes firestreak being delusional again. please find one post in this thread where i've said Valk can do whatever they want.

come back, you know you want to post. <3
 
Caerloc said:
Right here.
What is it they can blame themselves for?

And dont ignore the rest of my prior post.

I didn't feel the need to quote something that was already said by another poster. And yes, the blm taru can blame himself for overnuking and therefore losing claim. Ulli is not hard to control, nor is he hard to keep claim on if people do their job correctly. You're still not making sense....you've been hanging out with Fire too much! </comfort>
 
yanzi said:
there goes firestreak being delusional again. please find one post in this thread where i've said Valk can do whatever they want.

come back, you know you want to post. <3

That's his specialty. That and loving you of course. But who doesn't love teh Yanz. :emote_grouphug:
 
Arien said:
I didn't feel the need to quote something that was already said by another poster. And yes, the blm taru can blame himself for overnuking and therefore losing claim. Ulli is not hard to control, nor is he hard to keep claim on if people do their job correctly. You're still not making sense....you've been hanging out with Fire too much! </comfort>

So they have themselves to blame for loosing claim.
And that they lost claim, without being close to wiping,
with Ulli so close to death that a simple dia finished it off,
made it ok for your ls to take it? Is that the story you are
sticking with?

To me that sure sounds like you are telling them they only have themselves
to blame for your ls taking it.
 
Firestreak said:
Actually Rhaddy you're pretty fucking stupid, read it again smart guy. And it's a pretty stupid mentality, especially coming from a guy who got his sky gear and then ditched. Maybe if so many people didn't pull a Skaw one LS could be outa sky, Valkyrs, they could be done.

You mean have a job where your schedule is so late, and your shell keep pushing farming times earlier and earlier, right into your working schedule? Yeah, maybe if people didn't earn an income.. Seriously, don't just fucking look at me stopping Gods, not everybody can sit at home and play at nights, Firestreak.


versiontwo said:
Lol.
I have never heard of you....
Maybe because you think because you joined a "larger/older" LS makes you somewhat cooler and can distinguish who can or cannot go?

I've probably been in sky before you even started this game you retard.
This is no scrub, newb ls. You got 1 job at 75... MNK for that matter. maybe played 5 months and bought gil all your gil and think you are cool?

I would rather have SE ban people like you rather then gilsellers.

I've never heard of you either, outside of comments that you suck at your job. No where did I say you couldn't go, I said quit making new shells. Join ones already established, but then again, with your kinda rep, that might be impossible. New shells just make things harder for everyone, including yourselves. Don't believe in a free-no competition-camp Sky forever, it's going to end, especially when new shells are scheduling their farms overtop of shells that have been doing the same timeframes for over a year.

I've been playing Since October 2003. I hit Sky the Winter of 2004. I've never even seen you up there, let alone in game. 402:16:17:52 clocked in. Last I checked, thats more than 5 months, I played MNK to 75 before people jumped the shark and bandwagoned the job after the Ranger Nerf. Me and Groo are originals(Even thought he was 70 before me, I whooped Maat's ass first :P) As well, why the fuck would I have bought gil, if I call any Monk that buys a Scorpion harness(specificially for MNK, mind you) retarded? Why would I be sporting NQ Lv.72 STR rings?

I'm sorry that you've never heard of me, but a lot of people have. Might just be jealous of someone being more popular than you in an online game or something, to play the gilbuyer card on someone who is decked out in RA/EX gear you salivate over. Look out, Serise! You're a gil buyer! D: D: D:
 
And I didn't just ditch as soon as I got what I wanted. Any original member can tell you that, the one who did ditch as soon as they got their Osode, was Miisha. I was still around for a month and a half or so, when they started making the time conflict bad. Ontop of some members raking my nervers for said month and a half.
 
Caerloc said:
So they have themselves to blame for loosing claim.
And that they lost claim, without being close to wiping,
with Ulli so close to death that a simple dia finished it off,
made it ok for your ls to take it? Is that the story you are
sticking with?

To me that sure sounds like you are telling them they only have themselves
to blame for your ls taking it.

Your typing in short, fragmented thoughts shows me how you comprehend things. I will try to respond in that manner for the benefit of yourself.

Hi.
This is earth.
What the fuck do you want?
 
yanzi said:
btw, they ever find the body of that murdered high schooler in aruba?
OMG, i'm going to make a post in flameboard called aruba and flame until someone in aruba answers to me.

Here's where you said it. You imply it's wrong to flame Valks for their members stealing Ulli and then deciding to use the stone to pop Byakko knowing it was stolen. Because it's wrong to flame the country of Aruba because there was a murder commited there?

Am I the only one who sees this as saying, "As long as there's crime in the world, don't blame Valkyrs for doing whatever the fuck we want."

You make an argument and it seems like you don't even know what you're saying, or don't particulary care.

And Skaw don't get me started on you. Everyone starts having 'problems' with their LS members attitudes after they get all their sky shit. Oh no, you stayed a whole month and Miisha didn't wait that long? That must make you a fucking saint. Oh and your schedule means you can't make every run, so you decide not to make ANY runs. I know what the fuck happened, you can't just quirm out of this shit.

If you wanna be one of those guys, fine, be one of those guys. But don't be one of the reasons that some LS can't get out of sky, and then bitch new LS that come in trying to earn their own shit.

If you can't come anymore, why the fuck don't you give back your Osode? Oh wait, I forgot, that would be selfless. And it's much easier to be a selfish prick and then criticize the new guys because sky is crowded cause some LS can't seem to get finished 'cause guys like you and get the fuck out.

Forget it, just forget it. If you aren't even going to help your own team finish up after they decked you out, you have no right to brag about anything. You could have been the first MNK on the server to 75 for all I give a shit. I respect the "scrubs" or whatever the fuck you wanna call them that at least are trying their best to help their LS out.
 
Firestreak said:
And Skaw don't get me started on you. Everyone starts having 'problems' with their LS members attitudes after they get all their sky shit. Oh no, you stayed a whole month and Miisha didn't wait that long? That must make you a fucking saint. Oh and your schedule means you can't make every run, so you decide not to make ANY runs. I know what the fuck happened, you can't just quirm out of this shit.


Telling me how to play my job almost every day I'm there gets fucking annoying. If Valkyrs is still in doubt over why I completely stopped coming, maybe they missed me telling this member off in linkshell chat.


And yes, my schedule means I virtually can't make a single run. When I get off work Varies. It means I would be able show about an hour at the most, and once when I had to leave early because I was sick during farming(Despot didn't pop yet, but I was there for a good 40 minutes or so for him,) I wasn't credited as farming for him. So why bother showing up for that 60 minutes or less, if we don't get anything during that time, meant that I wouldn't have even been there, in essence.

My leaving Valkyrs doesn't even concern you. I still have a pearl sack, I might try and go back when I get a better job, so just shut the fuck up about it, Firestreak.
 
Caerloc said:
I love how people think swearwords are a good when they know
they dont have a decent argument to fall back on.

But really. It's not.

Ok I won't swear this time if it makes you happy.

What are you talking about?
What is your argument in the first place?
Who asked you?
Who are you?

I can answer the last two for you if needed. But you still haven't posted anything that brought relevance to anything else posted in this thread. What kind of point are you trying to make anyway? Can't be much of one if you haven't gotten it across in the number of posts you already have here.
 
Firestreak said:
Here's where you said it. You imply it's wrong to flame Valks for their members stealing Ulli and then deciding to use the stone to pop Byakko knowing it was stolen. Because it's wrong to flame the country of Aruba because there was a murder commited there?

Am I the only one who sees this as saying, "As long as there's crime in the world, don't blame Valkyrs for doing whatever the fuck we want."

You make an argument and it seems like you don't even know what you're saying, or don't particulary care.

yanzi said:
there goes firestreak being delusional again. please find one post in this thread where i've said Valk can do whatever they want.

how is saying they shouldn't flame a LS the same as saying a LS can do whatever they want? my example about aruba was only about principle, the one when if someone has done something bad, you blame the whole. the fallacy of the sum of all parts or something. that in no way is saying that valk can do whatever they want as you claim which is an endorsement of LS or person(s).
please come up with more delusional claims. <3
 
Arien said:
Ok I won't swear this time if it makes you happy.

What are you talking about?
What is your argument in the first place?
Who asked you?
Who are you?

I can answer the last two for you if needed. But you still haven't posted anything that brought relevance to anything else posted in this thread. What kind of point are you trying to make anyway? Can't be much of one if you haven't gotten it across in the number of posts you already have here.

I am talking about you, saying that the ls only had itself to blame
for having ulli stolen by your ls, only to turn around and say you never said
that.

Want me to post again the quotes where you said the ls only had itself
to blame, and the quotes where you say you never said that?

This is the flameboard. Everyone gets 2 cents to use here.

What relevance does it have who i am?
 
Arien said:
Let me guess, the overnuking taru or one of his close friends is the one who is up for the next haidate which is why it got his panties all in a wad. :rolleyes:

Lessons to learn from this:

1. Don't overnuke - you screwed up, pulled hate and fucked up the whole situation, only blame yourself

2. Don't trust anybody - with certain NMs you cannot expect people to just give you a free run at it, you should have kept a DOT on it and this wouldn't be an issue, common knowledge

3. Don't come here trying to flame a whole LS without looking in the mirror yourself
http://www.qcdn.org/showthread.php?t=12831&highlight=Versiontwo

Arien said:
Umm...no. That was me pointing out the mistake that made them lose claim. No where did I say they did not belong in sky or blame them for whatever you are trying to get it.

Arien said:
And yes, the blm taru can blame himself for overnuking and therefore losing claim.

There ya go, I did all the work for you.

Now, where did I blame the whole LS? That's right I didn't. I told the one person that overnuked to blame themself. Do you see that now? I sure do hope so cause it's taken you a long, long time to grasp that simple statement of fact.
 
Skaw said:
I've never heard of you either, outside of comments that you suck at your job. No where did I say you couldn't go, I said quit making new shells. Join ones already established, but then again, with your kinda rep, that might be impossible. New shells just make things harder for everyone, including yourselves. Don't believe in a free-no competition-camp Sky forever, it's going to end, especially when new shells are scheduling their farms overtop of shells that have been doing the same timeframes for over a year.

Skaw, I've been playing since NA release as well. Like you, with work and other commitments, I don't have the time to do all the things I'd like in this game. It's really limited my availability in sky. What right do you have to tell me what sky LS I can and can't join? Established LS's often have the attitude that "no sky experience" = "not recruited". Or they're not actively recruiting at all, because who wants a new guy with no sky gear? That just means more time in sky for the whole LS.

If you're pissed about CC'ing on top of established timeframes, well I'll tell you it was our established, scheduled farming session that Valk took advantage of.

I know where you're coming from. My time in sky is severely limited by RL commitments. It's worth a lot to me. So why can't others respect that? Your argument rests on the assumption that some people's time is more valuable than others, which stinks of elitism.
 
Arien said:
There ya go, I did all the work for you.

Now, where did I blame the whole LS? That's right I didn't. I told the one person that overnuked to blame themself. Do you see that now? I sure do hope so cause it's taken you a long, long time to grasp that simple statement of fact.

I dont see how you would come any better off by blaming one guy,
rather then an entire ls, for your ls stealing their mob.
 
Arien I think the operative phrase in your argument is #2:

Arien said:
2. Don't trust anybody - with certain NMs you cannot expect people to just give you a free run at it, you should have kept a DOT on it and this wouldn't be an issue, common knowledge

However, I would add to that: Don't trust anybody in Valkyrs.

After all, it was their actions that created this situation. It's like the family that got sued when a burglar broke into their home, fell and broke his leg. They were on vacation. He won that lawsuit. Shifting the blame to our members is like saying they deserved to get sued.
 
Back
Top