what is this person thinking?

[meeze]

I agree with you that sometimes the portrayal of such things is pretty conformist, and I'm all for noncomformity. Be yourself, who gives a fuck what others think, right? However while you're having fun, and people laugh along with you, you take it to an extreme sometimes and make futile attempts at policing people you deem unworthy of your 'positive' side. Even when I'm bitching someone down on the Flameboard, I add humor to it. You, just come in for the throat and don't care if you're going after the complete wrong people. Which, hon, you are.

I just put "lec and his band of morons", you guys obviously felt you were the morons I was referring to and responded to me.

Again, you just try to come off as some untouchable that really... just seems so obvious that you want to be well respected. Fear does not equal respect, and if in your eyes it does... well then I'm seriously disrespecting you. I still love you though, Meezy-poo.

How does one fear another on the net?

I'm just a blunt person, care bears have a big problem with that

 

[Romper]

Oh. My. God.

I've never seen that before, that is simply classic... and painful.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=gRKlvHguv_o

and

http://youtube.com/watch?v=F226lI-lo5M

For more viewing pleasure:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=uIaxf5HFnCo this one is the full today show interview.

 

[Morwen]

I just put "lec and his band of morons", you guys obviously felt you were the morons I was referring to and responded to me.

Because coming in right after we posted isn't a big hint, eh?

How does one fear another on the net?

I'm just a blunt person, care bears have a big problem with that

I don't know Meeze, why are you trying to put yourself in a position of dominance?

Blunt is one thing. Blunt people let you know whats up when its necessary. You however, come in and say what isn't necessary, hence the dominance complex. To dominate those that are unwilling is to attempt control. To attempt control over those that are willing is to impose upon. See where I'm going here?

 

[meeze]

Because coming in right after we posted isn't a big hint, eh?



I don't know Meeze, why are you trying to put yourself in a position of dominance?

Blunt is one thing. Blunt people let you know whats up when its necessary. You however, come in and say what isn't necessary, hence the dominance complex. To dominate those that are unwilling is to attempt control. To attempt control over those that are willing is to impose upon. See where I'm going here?

Ya, you're saying it has nothing to do with you guys derailing with the same crap in multiple threads, and its really about a power trip I'm looking for.

Cute theory, but it doesn't explain why I get so annoyed opening a new thread only to see the same group of morons babbling on about nonsense.

 

[Morwen]

Cute theory, but it doesn't explain why I get so annoyed opening a new thread only to see the same group of morons babbling on about nonsense.

It is rather nice isn't it and it seems, time and again, that it's true. You keep getting 'annoyed' because you cannot see humor, you take yourself too seriously. I do admit, that sometimes things go on too long. That thread about Arby's? Should be locked, no question about it. However, coming in here and directly going after people participating in a thread that not only never made any sense at all, was made by a sock-puppet and berating people for no reason other than carrying on a conversation because you don't like the way things are going is extremely pompous.

If you wanted to become a Mod, you should have applied when the position was offered. Since you aren't one; let them do their jobs themselves, they are perfectly capable. You don't have to stomp around and throw a fit when things aren't exactly your cuppa tea, gov.

 

[meeze]

It is rather nice isn't it and it seems, time and again, that it's true. You keep getting 'annoyed' because you cannot see humor, you take yourself too seriously. I do admit, that sometimes things go on too long. That thread about Arby's? Should be locked, no question about it. However, coming in here and directly going after people participating in a thread that not only never made any sense at all, was made by a sock-puppet and berating people for no reason other than carrying on a conversation because you don't like the way things are going is extremely pompous.

If you wanted to become a Mod, you should have applied when the position was offered. Since you aren't one; let them do their jobs themselves, they are perfectly capable. You don't have to stomp around and throw a fit when things aren't exactly your cuppa tea, gov.

It was actually a locked thread that spurred my rants in here. I figured out there was nothing in the arby's thread, but I did see arby's pop up in other threads. The humor isn't the problem, its the regurgetation, like the cat thing. Yes I think the cats are funny, but not every damned thread.

If a thread sucks, derail it, fine, if another thread sucks, let it die. Logging on to see 4-5 threads with the same people spamming the same shit is ridiculous. If you can't see the difference between me getting aggitated over one derail, and me getting aggitated over multiple threads, you need some comprehension courses in your life.

 

[Makelith]

I do admit, that sometimes things go on too long. That thread about Arby's? Should be locked, no question about it. However, coming in here and directly going after people participating in a thread that not only never made any sense at all, was made by a sock-puppet and berating people for no reason other than carrying on a conversation because you don't like the way things are going is extremely pompous.

If anything the Arby's thread has far more content than this thread, because more than 3 people were commenting at any given time.

You (you being: morwn and linhjah) are being no better than the "oh so terrible meeze". Should this topic be locked? Hell yes, before even "lec and his band of idiots" had their way with it. It was made by a sockpuppet, and its no content other than how lec still has bite marks on his ankle? Seriously now. I don't know how you can even compare the two.

Normally i don't really have a problem with any of you, but when you bring the Arby's thread in to this, you're in trouble.

 

[Morwen]

It was actually a locked thread that spurred my rants in here. I figured out there was nothing in the arby's thread, but I did see arby's pop up in other threads. The humor isn't the problem, its the regurgetation, like the cat thing. Yes I think the cats are funny, but not every damned thread.

Arby's popping up is just like the 'Queer Eye' thing, they see something that was funny and run with it to get laughs. It's called bonding, but yes I can tell when it becomes too much and understand why people basically come in like, "Alright, what is this shit?". Things become recycled too much and are then no longer amusing, just old hat. Arby's got old quick for me, so I no longer reacted to it in any way. Not to mention, those little chicken things give me heartburn, not good times.

If a thread sucks, derail it, fine, if another thread sucks, let it die. Logging on to see 4-5 threads with the same people spamming the same shit is ridiculous.

There are far more people posting the same 'non-derail' comments in multiple threads, always going after people the same way in every thread and continually creating them about nothing that you could take that to instead of people just having a good time.

If you can't see the difference between me getting aggitated over one derail, and me getting aggitated over multiple threads, you need some comprehension courses in your life.

I can see and understand you getting aggitated, over however many threads. But to come in and come at people like this? This is what is ridiculous. There is no reason for this level of aggression, or for this to have carried on this long. Blunt or not, you're just acting like an overbearing toddler stomping his feet.

 

[Morwen]

If anything the Arby's thread has far more content than this thread, because more than 3 people were commenting at any given time.

So Romper, Antor and others going on about eating mass amounts of fast food in detail enough to make your stomach turn has more content? I fear what your library has to offer.

You (you being: morwn and linhjah) are being no better than the "oh so terrible meeze". Should this topic be locked? Hell yes, before even "lec and his band of idiots" had their way with it. It was made by a sockpuppet, and its no content other than how lec still has bite marks on his ankle? Seriously now. I don't know how you can even compare the two.

I cannot control what other people say, some of it was over the top and unnecessary, I agree with with the statement and I said as much in prior posts.

Normally i don't really have a problem with any of you, but when you bring the Arby's thread in to this, you're in trouble.

I wasn't the one getting into specifics, try the Galka for that one. How am I in trouble here? Am I going to time-out?

 

[Romper]

So Romper, Antor and others going on about eating mass amounts of fast food in detail enough to make your stomach turn has more content? I fear what your library has to offer.



I cannot control what other people say, some of it was over the top and unnecessary, I agree with with the statement and I said as much in prior posts.



I wasn't the one getting into specifics, try the Galka for that one. How am I in trouble here? Am I going to time-out?

No you're going to get a spanking.

There was good cause for the fast food derail. Not all of it was fast food talk we got into Texas Roadhouse which isn't fast food. So please don't make it seem like that is all we eat is fast food 'Wenny.

 

[Morwen]

No you're going to get a spanking.

Obviously someone wants their hands cut off >_>

There was good cause for the fast food derail. Not all of it was fast food talk we got into Texas Roadhouse which isn't fast food. So please don't make it seem like that is all we eat is fast food 'Wenny.

The thread speaks for itself man.. seriously.

 

[Romper]

Obviously someone wants their hands cut off >_>



The thread speaks for itself man.. seriously.

Maybe I enjoy pain. Lol <3 you Wenny.

Yes we all enjoy fast food once in a while. This isn't the topic though so I wont brush that subject.

 

[Makelith]

So Romper, Antor and others going on about eating mass amounts of fast food in detail enough to make your stomach turn has more content? I fear what your library has to offer.

Because you know me so well? I happen to be a fan of mysteries and have a pretty good collection of them. Besides, at least we had a subject we could all talk about that had some relevance to life, and how people go about it. As i recall you even contributed in that thread for a pretty good while.

I wasn't the one getting into specifics, try the Galka for that one. How am I in trouble here? Am I going to time-out?

Actually......

I do admit, that sometimes things go on too long. That thread about Arby's? Should be locked, no question about it.

You were that one that did go in to specifics.

You are in trouble for being, i suppose a hypocrite of sorts? Pretty loosely used in that term, but used none the less. You demand a lock on something people were actually discussing, yet go on in this thread how you were?

h'ok.

 

[wolfskymoon]

Just to make things clear.
In ffxi :-

1- Coardination = Huge
2- Skill = Little
3- Gear= Somewhere in the middle.
4- Someone you can count on = Huge.
5- Knowledge + good computer = somewhere in the middle.
I'd take 1,2,4,5 anyday even if a player lacks 3. Not everyone has time to farm 24 hrs like some of you assholes so if you see someone in not the best gear, just don't invite him, but i don't see why you are bitching about it. That's like a professional athlete passing by your house and like throwing a rock at you, hey u nerd! maybe you should do varsity sports or something.
The point i'm trying to make is that everyone has the free will to do w/e the fuck they want, it's up to you to invite them to your group. So quit fucking flaming about stupid shit like someone's gear. That's not what the flameboard is for anyways.

 

[Lecreuset]

Damn, all this!

1. Meeze, I find it bad form to argue with my own LS mates in public. If my joking around and derails bothered you, you know I'm not the typical schmuck who's gonna give you an earful of shit if you let me know playing on these threads is buggin ya.

A simple pm my way would've nipped this in the bud at my end big dog. You know we've got no beef, and I would've been happy to play somewhere else to bide my time at home sick.

2. Mak, I'm not a fan of the sammiches, but I dig the Arby's finger foods! :O

3. Everyone else who wasted their precious time here, grab your knives and let's start cutting the tension here and move over to that other thread there! =D

...there's always playing Twister for an ice-breaker, but with Galkas like Meeze and Rompy here, I'm not sure that would pan out so well.

- Lec

 

[Morwen]

Because you know me so well? I happen to be a fan of mysteries and have a pretty good collection of them. Besides, at least we had a subject we could all talk about that had some relevance to life, and how people go about it. As i recall you even contributed in that thread for a pretty good while.

Most of what happened in the thread you're mentioning are things that are relevant to the people participating. We had all hung out the night before and we were just joking around. Because a conversation between a few people doesn't have relevance to your life, does not mean it has no relevance to others.

Actually......

You were that one that did go in to specifics.

Simply responding to this, I had no intention of mentioning anything prior to this comment:

Every thread has you idiots rambling on about nonsense, keep it to one thread so the whole QCDN doesn't have to read about arby's or w/e the hell you bitches and wanna be homos like to talk about.

You are in trouble for being, i suppose a hypocrite of sorts? Pretty loosely used in that term, but used none the less. You demand a lock on something people were actually discussing, yet go on in this thread how you were?

h'ok.

I have never demanded a lock, I commented that something derailed to that extect should be locked in my opinion. I'm not a mod, nor will I pretend to be. I wouldn't be as presumptuous as to come into a thread that wasn't mine and attempt to lock it or demand anything of the sort. Kudos for making assumptions.

As I said before in this thread...

We're all hypocrites here.

Anything else?

 

[meeze]

Most of what happened in the thread you're mentioning are things that are relevant to the people participating. We had all hung out the night before and we were just joking around. Because a conversation between a few people doesn't have relevance to your life, does not mean it has no relevance to others.



Simply responding to this, I had no intention of mentioning anything prior to this comment:





I have never demanded a lock, I commented that something derailed to that extect should be locked in my opinion. I'm not a mod, nor will I pretend to be. I wouldn't be as presumptuous as to come into a thread that wasn't mine and attempt to lock it or demand anything of the sort. Kudos for making assumptions.

As I said before in this thread...



Anything else?

The thing that is going over your head is the fact that it happens in multiple threads. Keep it in the arbys thread, keep it in private forum, make a thread just for your useless drivel. I don't like sifting through everyones crap to find posts on topic.

I don't get what you're beef is. I posted in one topic about Vick's stats and you were in there complaining about a derail, but thats ok with you. But the second I complain about multiple threads being derailed by the same group, all of a sudden I'm trying to be controlling or some shit.

Time to reasses your position on things.

 

[toqabowl]

seeing all these derailed threads are so annoying to read through
i think i needs to rate down anyone who derails threads on purpose(Zomg E-peen alert!!111!1oneoneone1!11!1)

 

[Makelith]

Most of what happened in the thread you're mentioning are things that are relevant to the people participating. We had all hung out the night before and we were just joking around. Because a conversation between a few people doesn't have relevance to your life, does not mean it has no relevance to others.

And thats exactly the stuff that could/should be taken to PMs, or if you are so close, why not just set up 3- way calling or something? I know the next line will be, "Well if you don't like it don't read it/ignore user." To which my response will be, i shouldn't have to do something, because you feel like bringing your personal life into it. Especially in multiple threads time after time. (This i haven't actually noticed happening, but if it has been noticed by someone, then it has gone long enough)

I have never demanded a lock, I commented that something derailed to that extect should be locked in my opinion. I'm not a mod, nor will I pretend to be. I wouldn't be as presumptuous as to come into a thread that wasn't mine and attempt to lock it or demand anything of the sort. Kudos for making assumptions.

Mis-phrase as far as i'm concerned then. "It should be locked, no question about it" is pretty strong.

Besides, the arby's thread was derailed by the second post. So i would say that it wasn't really derailled at all. It would make more sense to just delete WSM's first post and change the title and move it to off topic or something.

 

[Lukas]

Scrubs/House de-rail? {Where?}