$400 40 gig rumor.

Right, you come in and say there are no games. I point out there are tons of games. Then you qualify that it means something entirely different than "no games."

How about this one. I go and tell everyone that Xbox live costs 100 dollars a month. If you refute it then obviously you're dying for my approval of your piece of shit hardware.
 
Right, you come in and say there are no games. I point out there are tons of games. Then you qualify that it means something entirely different than "no games."

Actually, I was the one that claimed there were no games, and i didn't mean there were 0 games out for the system. Thats just silly. I meant it as there are no games, for me personally, and for many others, that warrents a buy of the PS3 for solely the gaming aspect of the console.

Strid simply put in better terms, the point i was trying to get across.

How about this one. I go and tell everyone that Xbox live costs 100 dollars a month. If you refute it then obviously you're dying for my approval of your piece of shit hardware.

This one just completly WOOOOOSHHHHes me...
 
I was saying that it's an idiotic stance to say something incorrect, then assume the person correcting you is doing so because they seek your approval. I just want to correct disinformation.
 
What exactly was incorrect about his opinion? Its an idiotic stance to assume that he is literal when he says there are "no games" especially when he made it clear what he meant by "no games".
 
What exactly was incorrect about his opinion? Its an idiotic stance to assume that he is literal when he says there are "no games" especially when he made it clear what he meant by "no games".

The standard at which someone can declare "No games" is too subjective and entirely based on perspective. What I find interesting is that whenever something good happens for the PS3, such as an exclusive announced, a firmware increasing functionality or a price drop - suddenly every Xbox 360 fan's perspective is that the PS3 is somehow worse off than it was before.

The reality is that the more competitive the situation, the more threatened they are, and therefore the more against the system they are, and as a result, their perspective is skewed.

We choose what we dislike and all things are in context. We don't sit down and just play Halo or Heavenly sword. If you love Xbox, then you sit down playing Halo knowing that this is the flagship title and you're supposed to enjoy it, because millions of other people do as well.

Strid is the kind of guy who talks shit about PS3 games he hasn't played. That's his perspective, he's never touched them but he knows he hates them and that his opinion of them is valid. He's never played Warhawk but he's confident that Lost Planet is better. He's never played Heavenly Sword but he's sure that all the game has going for it is pretty graphics. For christ sake, he declared the other day that MISTWALKER has taken the torch from SQUARE-ENIX. If no games is a matter entirely of perspective, then PS3 is not allowed to have games from the perspective of 360 die hards, and here is the reason.

Step 1) Dislike all PS3 exclusives without playing them.
Step 2) Declare the system has no games, because from your own perspective, it has no exclusive games you want.

Now if you notice, I don't go around bashing 360 games. First off, I actually play them and try them out. Second off, I give credit where it's due, which a lot of software developers on both sides deserve. Third off, I give damnation where it's due, which a lot of devs for Wii games who clearly are lazy pieces of shit deserve.

The fact remains, that the "exclusives" 360 has inevitably end up on PC same day or months to a year later or they'll end up on the PS3. To top it all off, they charge for online, which Xbox fans accept WAY WAY WAY too easily, and their system reliability is junk, which yet again... Xbox fans forgive WAY WAY WAY too easily. Really... the first game I want that's staying exclusive on the 360 for sure is Ninja Gaiden 2. I can't imagine that getting a PC port, and from what I hear MS is publishing it.

I wanted Dead Rising too until I actually played it... mindless bullshit.
 
Last edited:
Aww, I hurt his butt. Get a grip man, I don't like what you like. Deal with it.

The End.
 
You hurt his butt because you're a tool and when you go around ramming tools up peoples asses for the fun of it its gonna hurt. But hey we can all act badass like you too.
Halo3 sucks, I havent played it but all it has going for it is half rate shit multiplayer online that you have to pay for, and it'll be on pc here in a year or so anyways so who cares, its gay, therefore you're gay. I dont like what you like, deal with it.
 
i dont know why everyone is saying PS3 has no games. It may not live up to 360's exclusives(right now), but there are good exclusives for it. If need so, I will name.

Now about the price.$300 vs $400-500. Price is no excuse when buying a system, if you use this excuse, this is fanboyism. There's no way you CAN'T save up a extra 100-200 bucks if you really want a PS3.

Xbox: System Failure 75% of the time = Unable to play games. I prove this my giving a link to youtube.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=GLOPW1Qe1HU

Good exclusives.

$50 for online

...That's it...

PS3: Rarely fails to break down. In fact have never seen anyone on IGN make a post saying "My PS3 crashed!" in my life.

Good exlusives(Just not as many right now), still good games that are on the system that are not exclusive.

Free Online

CHEAP Blu-Ray(What is it $800-1000 for regular Blu-Ray?)

If you ask me, PS3 is the winner, esp with alot more exclusives on the way. And I can FINISH games I can play. "Y Hello thar Halo 3.....wtf 3 red rings of death on last stage gg!"
 
Last edited:
i dont know why everyone is saying PS3 has no games. It may not live up to 360's exclusives(right now)

This is the reason. Right now is what matters. Next year doesn't do someone much good, when they are looking to buy now.

Now about the price.$300 vs $400-500. Price is no excuse when buying a system, if you use this excuse, this is fanboyism. There's no way you CAN'T save up a extra 100-200 bucks if you really want a PS3.

Xbox: System Failure 75% of the time = Unable to play games. I prove this my giving a link to youtube.

Holy shit, dude. You know absouletly nothing about the 360 failure rates. You're even worse than when Firestreak used to talk about a biased online poll saying that failure rates were 66%. Its no where near a 75% failure rate. Where do you even get these numbers? I'm not gonna bother looking at your youtube link, because its even less credible then shit like wikipedia.
You are an idiot, and the worst PS3 fanboy i've seen. Ever.

PS3: Rarely fails to break down. In fact have never seen anyone on IGN make a post saying "My PS3 crashed!" in my life.

Good exlusives(Just not as many right now), still good games that are on the system that are not exclusive.

Free Online

CHEAP Blu-Ray(What is it $800-1000 for regular Blu-Ray?)

If you ask me, PS3 is the winner, esp with alot more exclusives on the way. And I can FINISH games I can play. "Y Hello thar Halo 3.....wtf 3 red rings of death on last stage gg!"

Well for $500 it better not fucking break down. Its also had an extra year (maybe more) of fine tuning?

Free online, yeah thats great, but you don't realize what you are paying for on xbox live, and thats the cross game chat/invites. I'm more than happy to pay $50/year to have a feature i wouldn't normally have, that i use a whole lot every day. You don't need a gold account to get demos, just FYI. You have shown you don't know a whole lot about anything.

And the Blu-ray. Where the PS3 actually wins. However, most people don't have a need for. Not a whole lot of people, that i know of would replace their whole DVD collection, for Blu-ray. It would be a better point for you to talk about the PS3's ability to upscale DVDs. A feature that i just learned about today that almost made me go and buy a PS3 now.

Its pretty stupid to buy something now for a single game you are getting in the future. Which is what most people are doing. Bugs can be fixed, hardware can be improved, and any other number of things could be improved upon in that time.

More exclusives *on the way* doesn't do any good now.

Try to bring some intelligent conversation, or at least get your baseline facts straight. You're worse than the 360tards out there.
 
November 22, 2005
November 17 , 2006
Xbox360 damn well better have more exclusives than a PS3 since they had a 1 year head start. Or is that one of those 'trivial' facts that are no excuse for having less games.
 
Xbox360 damn well better have more exclusives than a PS3 since they had a 1 year head start. Or is that one of those 'trivial' facts that are no excuse for having less games.

Are you just trying to be a stupid version of Firestreak or something? No one has said they have less games or no games. There aren't single games that don't have enough attention brought to them to warrant the $500 price tag on the PS3.

While the 360 has a few titles like this. Where as the only game even close to that calibur the PS3 has is Warhawk. Yes, the 360 been out a year longer, but that should only affect the quantity of games, not the quality.
 
So I guess absolutely everyone only loves first person shooters and big name titles. Nobody in the world likes sports games, which is what PS3 has... But I guess you could keep saying PS3 has 'no games' like your taste is exactly like everyone else's, its cool.

You don't think if the PS3 was cheaper more people would buy it just to have it for when the games do come out? Its about the money no matter which way you look at it.

The Wii also gets sports games. I find that they tend to be more fun on the Wii and so does my brother who lives by Madden on Playstation. When I came home with Madden 08 and The Bigs he was like holy shit this is fun.

Granted graphics don't compare I still have fun which is what video games are suppose to be.

Baja already said most sports games are also on the 360.
 
Are you just trying to be a stupid version of Firestreak or something? No one has said they have less games or no games. There aren't single games that don't have enough attention brought to them to warrant the $500 price tag on the PS3.

While the 360 has a few titles like this. Where as the only game even close to that calibur the PS3 has is Warhawk. Yes, the 360 been out a year longer, but that should only affect the quantity of games, not the quality.

You caught me, I was clearly doing my very best at being a stupid version of Firestreak, you win. :rolleyes: You are cleeearly just tooo smart and witty for me. I mean, honestly the BEST games on a system should be out directly following launch, I mean thats the way it is with every system. Wii got WiiSports, Xbox360 got Kameo, PS3 should get something AWESOME like Kameo at launch, not shit like Motorstorm or pff Resistance.

Take Xbox360 back to year 1, what games did it have that were awesome!? Uh.. I think Gears of War made it into Year 1 didnt it? Its going to PC, no longer cool cause its on multiple systems orz.

"The Xbox 360 didn't launch with a killer app. The system's outstanding games came in the form of a PC port with Call of Duty 2, and an Xbox Live Arcade game, Geometry Wars Evolved."

"Yes, the 360 been out a year longer, but that should only affect the quantity of games, not the quality."
 
Xbox360 got Kameo, PS3 should get something AWESOME like Kameo at launch, not shit like Motorstorm or pff Resistance.

I never cared for Kameo. I thought it was pretty stupid, actually. I never even paid for my 360. I didn't even get one until June, for Graduation. I was fully planning on buying one for Halo 3, and then probably picking up GoW while i was at it.

I also only know the PS3 games that my friends like/play. My friends like and play Warhawk and Heavenly Sword. So i don't know much about Motorstorm or Resistance.

Take Xbox360 back to year 1, what games did it have that were awesome!? Uh.. I think Gears of War made it into Year 1 didnt it? Its going to PC, no longer cool cause its on multiple systems orz.

I don't see why you feel the need to lash out at me with stupid little sayings like this when i have been supportive of the PS3, but yes, GoW was in year one, and was a massive system seller. If resistance or Motorstorm were any good, i probably would have heard of them or heard my friends talk about them. See how stupid this is getting?

I take back my thing about you being a stupid Firestreak. You are more like a stupid Clocian.
 
Cool, you can call me stupid -name of person i dont know- congrats. You're a stupid Ralf Archabald, take that! ooo burrnnnn
I lash out because you say retarded shit like

Yes, the 360 been out a year longer, but that should only affect the quantity of games, not the quality.

If time didnt = quality, why the hell dont games just magically come out day after day hit after hit after hit.

Gawd I take back what I said about you being a stupid Ralf Archabald, you're more like a stupid Danny Evesman!
 
You took that far too literally, but whatever.

Or is that one of those 'trivial' facts that are no excuse for having less games.

And you come in saying stupid shit like this.

So we're even then. Stupid thing for stupid thing and can get back to a real discussion?

What i should have mentioned was more of a % over time thing i suppose. The 360 has been out for an extra year and has more games. Alot of those games are pretty stupid though. Blue Dragon, Crackdown, Armored Core 4, and N3 all come to mind. In that same year, however, wonderful games that are fun have come out. Gow, Eternal Sonata, Halo 3, and Viva Pinata all come to mind.

PS3 has the same deal. Its just farther behind on the timeline.
 
Its called sarcasm, I use it, apparently you don't.
All of those games are good in their own right, but this whole thing is based on personal opinion.

Some people could find Resistance more than enough of a reason to buy a ps3, some could find Heavenly Sword more than enough. Hell someone could find Ninja Gaiden Sigma a reason to buy it, it all comes down to what the person wants. And if they just wanna buy it to have it, I don't think that should be a bad thing.

If you have the money, why not?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top