Peregrine said:
I don't reply to the whole thing. I read the functional point, and what I read is the title that says "ultimatum" and 90 percent of the ensuing paragraphs that talk about mpk retaliation. I'm not missing much. One little sentence talked about mpk prevention. One. You want to call me out for nitpicking all but one sentence? I covered 30 sentences.
While MPK retaliation is what got the majority of the post space on this forum, it is what i am talking about the least on our own. I gave it the most room here because it was the part that i expected (and rightly so) to get the most response on.
quote from one of the posts on this topic from our LS forums.
More important than our reaction to a sucessful MPK we need to figure out ways to prevent it.
-We can have one person who stands near the drop down who can sleep spiders as they come.
-In the event of a MPK attempt if we start failing we can cause a flail after getting most of our members out and CFH it while they run back in.
-We should study the area and figure out where the fight shoudl take place to make it the most difficult to MPK us. I know it's a small area, but no factor to preventing this from happening is too small to consider.
-We could have a small party up who are dedicated simply to clearing out spiders. I don't know how practicle this is, but it may be a good idea.
-We could have some of our BLMS purposefully take all the spiders to the zone line and sleep them, sort of how we did with the Snolls at Jormangand.
Please, although i think it is the time to react to their actions, at the same time i think it is better to be proactive and simply prevent the situation from happening. List other ideas, lets make it so we can dominate without sinking to their level if at all possible.
Honest to god, the most effective response is prevention, i'm well aware of that. That is what i want to focus on. Bringing more numbers, perhaps making agreements with other shells to stop MPK attempts if we happen to be at the same camp. While a alliance for this sort of thing may be nice, given the touchy politics between shells i don't think that at *this* point it would be practicle.
in general to people responding to pere, he is writing intelligently and for the most part very clamly on this topic. It's going to split the community, because the consiquences of this are pretty big... there are going to be a number of people against this; personally i am actually one of them, but i know that my LS is at the point where it can't progress if we don't do something, and the game simply doesn't provide any incentive for these people to start behaving.
If you want to argue with him that's fine, that's going to happen, this is a debate. But, his points are valid, so please refrain from name calling, and at least give them some consideration. Sorry for... idk trying to direct the conversation i guess, i just don't want it to end up as a shouting match.
Colbwa, Maseki responded right away because he and i had been talking while i was making the post, he knew about it before it was up.
Others, kindly ingnore colbwa, if it becomes a yelling match against him there won't be anymore useful posts.