- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 5,333
- Age
- 40
- Location
- Johnson City, TN
- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- FFXIV
- Arctyrael
Some substance. That I can work with.
None of the posts that were in the thread, "the new tank," were removed by me except yours. And in fact, I believe someone did quote it, and I also removed that post. So perhaps you're referring to some other time, for which you're extremely late on the up-take. QCDN has been decently behaved as of late.
So then, why did I remove yours, and not, for example, Bajaratt's. (I only use your name because you already mentioned you received the infraction. I try to at least maintain some privacy as to what I do with people's accounts.) A professionalism some might would say a worthy mod quality, Skaw.
Lest I digress, Bajaratt's post had content in it. The point of the flamebaiting infractions is not to expunge pertinent posts from user viewer. It is to let the poster know, "Hey, you fucked up. Please, don't repeat said behavior." Now, if all your post contains is the infractible material, then why leave it to cause more controversy? Bajaratt's post still had potential for discussion. Your's was pure flamebait and I was only happy to remove it.
None of the posts that were in the thread, "the new tank," were removed by me except yours. And in fact, I believe someone did quote it, and I also removed that post. So perhaps you're referring to some other time, for which you're extremely late on the up-take. QCDN has been decently behaved as of late.
So then, why did I remove yours, and not, for example, Bajaratt's. (I only use your name because you already mentioned you received the infraction. I try to at least maintain some privacy as to what I do with people's accounts.) A professionalism some might would say a worthy mod quality, Skaw.
Lest I digress, Bajaratt's post had content in it. The point of the flamebaiting infractions is not to expunge pertinent posts from user viewer. It is to let the poster know, "Hey, you fucked up. Please, don't repeat said behavior." Now, if all your post contains is the infractible material, then why leave it to cause more controversy? Bajaratt's post still had potential for discussion. Your's was pure flamebait and I was only happy to remove it.