Avesta

If those asshole mods put some sort of search function on this site we wouldn't have these issues. Lazy son of a bitch mods never do anything to help around here. D:

I mean, how hard is it to put something like "Search" in some sort of menu somewhere on the front page?
 
If those asshole mods put some sort of search function on this site we wouldn't have these issues. Lazy son of a bitch mods never do anything to help around here. D:

I mean, how hard is it to put something like "Search" in some sort of menu somewhere on the front page?

o.o If we could simply search then we couldn't necro things like some still do.
 
sheesh, on the warpath much?

he's obviously new here (and to the game to an extent)

cut him some slack.
 
sig comprimised to accomodate the win in the thread
 
For the record, I've always felt that QCDN delivered mixed messages when it comes to oft-posted topics. On one hand, you have the ever-pervasive attitude "z0MG nebber postz abowt stuffz we alreddy talked 'bout!!" This is the dominating philosophy that nearly all Internet forums have adopted.

Then again, QCDN ALSO also takes the far rarer stance that "necroposting is bad." There's a semi-famous flash movie that's been around a few years that explains, condescendingly, that "it is always better to post in an existing thread than create a new one." It's literally linked to buy 60% of message boards, which is a direct contradiction of the "don't necro threads" rules that some other boards (including ours) has. That's fine, but most communities are smart enough to stay consistent with either one attitude, or the other.

We try to have it both ways, and it's all rather conflicted.

Either we let newer members talk about things that the older members have already covered before by creating their own threads ... or we kick out the thread necromancy rule. Declaring a topic "off-limits" simply because those of us that were here 2 years ago are "done" with it has always come across to me as horribly stupid.




Yes, Avesta pwnz us.
 
Sure Avesta can solo Genbu, but can he tell why kids love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

Only if his name is also Sage Sundi.
 
For the record, I've always felt that QCDN delivered mixed messages when it comes to oft-posted topics. On one hand, you have the ever-pervasive attitude "z0MG nebber postz abowt stuffz we alreddy talked 'bout!!" This is the dominating philosophy that nearly all Internet forums have adopted.

Then again, QCDN ALSO also takes the far rarer stance that "necroposting is bad." There's a semi-famous flash movie that's been around a few years that explains, condescendingly, that "it is always better to post in an existing thread than create a new one." It's literally linked to buy 60% of message boards, which is a direct contradiction of the "don't necro threads" rules that some other boards (including ours) has. That's fine, but most communities are smart enough to stay consistent with either one attitude, or the other.

We try to have it both ways, and it's all rather conflicted.

Either we let newer members talk about things that the older members have already covered before by creating their own threads ... or we kick out the thread necromancy rule. Declaring a topic "off-limits" simply because those of us that were here 2 years ago are "done" with it has always come across to me as horribly stupid.




Yes, Avesta pwnz us.

Well the correct way would be to search the topic and if you have something meaningful to add to the previous conversation about the topic then make a new thread with a link to the old thread. This way you dont repeat any information as well as you dont necro a thread.
 
Well the correct way would be to search the topic and if you have something meaningful to add to the previous conversation about the topic then make a new thread with a link to the old thread. This way you dont repeat any information as well as you dont necro a thread.

The occassional thread in which this procedure is actually followed are rarely spared from the flames in the slightest, but you're correct in that this is the "official" line.

Of course, THIS particular thread is probably not the best of examples, as the original post was a one-liner, contained no real content, demonstrated an unwillingness to even TRY to investigate how "old" of a topic this might be (no "I know this has been talked about before" mea culpa) ... and was utterly inane to boot.

Bleh, I'm talking myself out of the ideas presented in my previous post. o_o
 
hey guys I hear theres this rdm thats been soloing some sick shit.

I also came from 2005 to tell you guys this.
 
Back
Top