- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 1,107
- Age
- 44
- Location
- Right behind you
- Nation Banner

- Main Job

- Secondary Job

- Third Job

- Server
- Quetzalcoatl
- Linkshell
- PheonixPimps
- FFXIV
- Bootz
How about we just ban Amerie?
How about we just ban Amerie?
How about we just ban Amerie?
More and more I get the feeling people are scrutinising the wrong issue at hand. I don't disagree that something needs to be done about the Blogs, and really all that needs to be said about that topic has been said already.
So what happens next? Prior abuse of the Reputation system moved onto abuse of the Blog feature. After fixing the Blogs, there'll just be another abused feature coming up the next few months down the line. (Perhaps sooner).
It really isn't the features of the board that are the problem.
It really isn't the features of the board that are the problem.
Yea, you aren't calling names. You're abusing the system. I don't need to say anything else, Dino rounded it up quite nicely. I'm appauled at how you think your behaviour is acceptable.Im not calling names.. Im not being hurtful.
attacking ppl using a BLOG is SOMETHING I DID NOT DO.
My entries of recent have been angry and flamebatish. I'll take responsiblity for that.
...
In my eyes I didnt flamebait.
My entries of recent have been angry and flamebatish. I'll take responsiblity for that. Anyone who reads my blog long term can clearly see thats not the intention of it.
A group of people are PISSED at me for making reference to someone who is banned from qcdn. Keep in mind, i've never ever once said this persons name. It could be anyone, it was narrowed down to "some znm ls leader" that might be considered same thing.
My blog was a project of mine. A person one and its turned into something else.
People who are banned shouldnt be allowed to go through extreme measures to get access on qcdn. I have and will always be willing to follow the rules. Im not above the qcdn Laws. My point is, I should be allowed to express myself without fearing being trolled by someone who has already lost his chance at taking part in qcdn.
I got tired of the flameboard. So i take my blogs to vent, I made a promise to myself that it would never be name calling or calling ppl out because I didnt want it to be considered flamebaiting. I was really careful but in the end Its become something I talk about alot recently because its gettin on my nerves.
According to the rules, I may be guilty of flamebating. I'll take responsiblity for that but at the same time, I was respectful enough not to mention ppls names and I think not doing that left alot of room for ppl not to feel AIMED AT, therefor it not being flamebaiting.
People should have the right to blog about what they wanna talk aout as long as it is in accordince with qcdn law. I was treading on thin waters in somes opinion my making reference to znms but come on... Im not calling names.. Im not being hurtful.
I have NP not menting reference to them anymore if thats big of a deal. Making blog entries with explicent language, IRL attacks etc.. Thats just uncalled and that is a line i did not and will never cross.
In my eyes I didnt flamebait. In others it might be considered flamebait to say something like "that znm ls leader" etc. I accept that and will take responsibility for it but attacking ppl using a BLOG is SOMETHING I DID NOT DO. I said a bitchy/smart ass comments that might be walking on thin ice but its debatable whether its flamebaiting and as i said, I wont do that anymore but the irl attacks and explicent langauge etc.. That is so far from what I'm doing and I dont want ppl to confuse my blog for theirs because THERE IS is a big difference and you can see that if you actually read my blogs and theres.
Thiers was clearly a full out assault on me. Thats totally difference then me venting about all while not actually calling them out. Although as I said, it could be light flamebaiting.
People should be fair and consider both sides. I dont think im imagining all of this. I will take responsiblty for me but not them.
I'm not innocent and will take whatever punishment but there is alot fo consider. Does it even COUNT as a flamebait if THE PERSON IS BANNED?
People ask me all the time in game who Im referring too. In my eyes, they made it more ABOUT THEM than I did. They took it as an assault on them without me mentioning names and blew it up into something. I admit, Yeah I shouldnt have said some of those things aboout ZNMs etc but.. Was I breaking the rules? I think not but w/e
My entries of recent have been angry and flamebatish. I'll take responsiblity for that. Anyone who reads my blog long term can clearly see thats not the intention of it.
Amerie said:A group of people are PISSED at me for making reference to someone who is banned from qcdn. Keep in mind, i've never ever once said this persons name. It could be anyone, it was narrowed down to "some znm ls leader" that might be considered same thing.
Amerie said:My blog was a project of mine. A person one and its turned into something else.
People who are banned shouldnt be allowed to go through extreme measures to get access on qcdn. I have and will always be willing to follow the rules. Im not above the qcdn Laws. My point is, I should be allowed to express myself without fearing being trolled by someone who has already lost his chance at taking part in qcdn.
Amerie said:I got tired of the flameboard. So i take my blogs to vent, I made a promise to myself that it would never be name calling or calling ppl out because I didnt want it to be considered flamebaiting. I was really careful but in the end Its become something I talk about alot recently because its gettin on my nerves.
Amerie said:According to the rules, I may be guilty of flamebating. I'll take responsiblity for that but at the same time, I was respectful enough not to mention ppls names and I think not doing that left alot of room for ppl not to feel AIMED AT, therefor it not being flamebaiting.
Amerie said:People should have the right to blog about what they wanna talk aout as long as it is in accordince with qcdn law. I was treading on thin waters in somes opinion my making reference to znms but come on... Im not calling names.. Im not being hurtful.
I have NP not menting reference to them anymore if thats big of a deal. Making blog entries with explicent language, IRL attacks etc.. Thats just uncalled and that is a line i did not and will never cross.
Amerie said:In my eyes I didnt flamebait. In others it might be considered flamebait to say something like "that znm ls leader" etc. I accept that and will take responsibility for it but attacking ppl using a BLOG is SOMETHING I DID NOT DO. I said a bitchy/smart ass comments that might be walking on thin ice but its debatable whether its flamebaiting and as i said, I wont do that anymore but the irl attacks and explicent langauge etc.. That is so far from what I'm doing and I dont want ppl to confuse my blog for theirs because is a big difference and you can see that if you actually read my blogs and theres.
Amerie said:Thiers was clearly a full out assault on me. Thats totally difference then me venting about all while not actually calling them out. Although as I said, it could be light flamebaiting.
People should be fair and consider both sides. I dont im imagining all of this. I will take responsiblty for me but not them.
My entries of recent have been angry and flamebatish. I'll take responsiblity for that. Anyone who reads my blog long term can clearly see thats not the intention of it.
A group of people are PISSED at me for making reference to someone who is banned from qcdn. Keep in mind, i've never ever once said this persons name. It could be anyone, it was narrowed down to "some znm ls leader" that might be considered same thing.
My blog was a project of mine. A person one and its turned into something else.
People who are banned shouldnt be allowed to go through extreme measures to get access on qcdn. I have and will always be willing to follow the rules. Im not above the qcdn Laws. My point is, I should be allowed to express myself without fearing being trolled by someone who has already lost his chance at taking part in qcdn.
I got tired of the flameboard. So i take my blogs to vent, I made a promise to myself that it would never be name calling or calling ppl out because I didnt want it to be considered flamebaiting. I was really careful but in the end Its become something I talk about alot recently because its gettin on my nerves.
According to the rules, I may be guilty of flamebating. I'll take responsiblity for that but at the same time, I was respectful enough not to mention ppls names and I think not doing that left alot of room for ppl not to feel AIMED AT, therefor it not being flamebaiting.
People should have the right to blog about what they wanna talk aout as long as it is in accordince with qcdn law. I was treading on thin waters in somes opinion my making reference to znms but come on... Im not calling names.. Im not being hurtful.
I have NP not menting reference to them anymore if thats big of a deal. Making blog entries with explicent language, IRL attacks etc.. Thats just uncalled and that is a line i did not and will never cross.[/qupte]
It is not up to the users of QCDN to decide what the future of your blog or what you put in it. We can make our cases to the administrators and hope they choose the right path, so you may want to contact them instead of trying to plead with us.
In my eyes I didnt flamebait. In others it might be considered flamebait to say something like "that znm ls leader" etc. I accept that and will take responsibility for it but attacking ppl using a BLOG is SOMETHING I DID NOT DO. I said a bitchy/smart ass comments that might be walking on thin ice but its debatable whether its flamebaiting and as i said, I wont do that anymore but the irl attacks and explicent langauge etc.. That is so far from what I'm doing and I dont want ppl to confuse my blog for theirs because is a big difference and you can see that if you actually read my blogs and theres.
The only recommendation I have for you is the read over your post and actually try to think of it from the other point of view, like you say later in this post. If you can see that it could be considered flamebaiting, take it out of your blog.
Thiers was clearly a full out assault on me. Thats totally difference then me venting about all while not actually calling them out. Although as I said, it could be light flamebaiting.
People should be fair and consider both sides. I dont im imagining all of this. I will take responsiblty for me but not them.
The other blogs can also be considered venting. They are also feeling annoyed and aggravated much like you are and they decided to take it out in their own blogs. If you say that you should be able to post what you want in yours...they should be able to post what they want in theirs.
At this point, it would be best to take the argument away from this and wait for a post from the moderation team in regards to what will happen to the blogs. This thread is not a full out attack on you or anyone else, it is simply bringing up an issue. I think it would be best if we continued to give our opinion on the blog feature itself instead of making this thread all about Amy.
""dumb bitch who's name starts with Mire".
So in order to not get called out on your hypocrisy, you post things while “not naming names” or “not hurting anyone’s feelings”?
You bring attention right to yourself because people are just waiting for you to open your mouth and say the wrong thing in your “blog” your “blog” has seriously turned into your own personal flame board where you get to smack everyone else around and there isn’t really any kind of defense from the nameless.
I was following your blog for a while because I kind of felt bad for you. Seemed really sad and depressed and stuff but you literally give people the fuel to rip you apart and I honestly don’t know why.
If you want to share opinions on your gaming experience in a blog that’s cool but honestly I would ask the mods to remove the blog feature all together before having another 50 people do what you are doing.