December 21, 2012 and Planet X

That's something else that gripes me. While yes, we're supposed to *want* to go to Heaven with Jesus and God etc., I don't think we're meant to put our lives on utter hold because we're anxiously awaiting His/Their return. That's why there's no tangible date given.

What are you guys talking about? I'm a Jehovah, and Jesus swung by back in 1918. Had a drink with the guy. He doesn't tip.

Anyway, science doesn't appear to be on your side, Anttaru. It seems like your rebuttal to that is simply that it's some sort of conspiracy.

With an, "If you can't technically disprove me, then I'm not wrong" defense, people are going to draw their own conclusions, so I don't see why you're being so adamant. It's the reason I don't like to discuss religion with people.

Regardless, this will be a fascinating planetary phenomenon, and I'll be outside stargazing. If you're already in your shelter, I'll give you a call when it's safe to come out.
 
Last edited:
Oh please. Premarital sex is awesome. You gotta try on the shoe before you buy it. My fiance and I would not be as close, or as in love, as we are now if we had stowed away our emotions and sexual frustration in tight little packages.

I prefer it also, but there is still the fact far less STD's would be spread if we only stuck to having sex with one person. Right or Wrong ?

This is for consideration of our species. On a large scale that's not the case. I wish you and you're fiancee well.

I don't claim to be a saint either. For me, If the sex isn't good, it won't work out. I've become very attracted to women that possess the attributes of my 2nd partner.

Alyada said:
This is why, in my personal belief, most Christians are so uptight. (c wut i did thar)

Uptight cause they are told to practice clean behavior ? I honestly have no desire to speak for Christians, i do know a lot of them and none of them are perfect.

Alyada said:
Sex is awesome. And you should all strive to have it. Probably help chill you out a little more. :\

So long as you and fiancee remain loyal to one another, you, her and you're children will be safe from STD. If either of you screw around, it can cause much pain. Not implying it will happen. But you should have understood the point to begin with.
 
I would. Please enlighten me, Ant; how is what I said not open-minded to your beliefs?

First. It's not important to me that you're open minded to my beliefs. And second, losing you're cool then telling me how you'll never listen to a mortal shouting Mayan calendar is kinda far out, considering i don't expect everyone to examine the topic. I stated how we'll see what happens on that day. I never said that day is the first day of tribulation.


Tristam Green said:
Shall I use my Stellar Raccoon example again? You're free to believe what you want, dude. I don't have to agree with it though.

You're speaking as though i'm trying to force you to believe any of this. I already wrote about respecting others beliefs. And i also mentioned i dislike it when people try to get me to join their religion, so i don't force my beliefs on anyone. I don't care much for you're raccoon example, because you're reactions to what i wrote about are inadequate. Show me 1 line where i said you must believe.

Tristam Green said:
Being open-minded doesn't mean pandering, no matter how you slice it. You have been presented factual evidence as to why this theory cannot work, and you still persist.

What evidence are you talking about? I already mentioned with or without Nibiru, we're still going to have a pole shift sooner or later. In terms of speculation i put Eris on the table.

Tristam Green said:
Granted, many Atheists and Nihilists would say the same to Christians worldwide, so perhaps we're not so different after all.

Yeah like the people disrespecting Christians the hell right now in here, as though Christians are like the borg, "you're all the same blind naive uptight types who think you're belief is the better." That's what i gather from the different comments from the others. It's disrespectful. And you're the 2nd one here to mock me on the religious scale.
 
Wow this is very interesting.....so much stuff out there that's unexplainable...but this o.o wow...

Edit: Question, who are the lil small aliens ppl have been seeing? Also o.o been tons of Ufo sightings in Texas recently :O. Man ~__~ wish I had some answers. Big aliens vs lil aliens o.o ... by lil I mean 4 feet max.
 
Last edited:
Besides, we know how it all really ends: Ragnarok.

It's Odin's world. We just live in it.

Odin's mean :( I spend my time to work through his ruins to get to him under 20 minutes which made NO SENSE why there was one and then he doesn't ever come to help me, the big meany.
 
Besides, we know how it all really ends: Ragnarok.

It's Odin's world. We just live in it.

QFT waiting for fenrir to swallow the world one day at a time..one day at a time
 
I prefer it also, but there is still the fact far less STD's would be spread if we only stuck to having sex with one person. Right or Wrong ?

This is for consideration of our species. On a large scale that's not the case. I wish you and you're fiancee well.

I don't claim to be a saint either. For me, If the sex isn't good, it won't work out. I've become very attracted to women that possess the attributes of my 2nd partner.



Uptight cause they are told to practice clean behavior ? I honestly have no desire to speak for Christians, i do know a lot of them and none of them are perfect.



So long as you and fiancee remain loyal to one another, you, her and you're children will be safe from STD. If either of you screw around, it can cause much pain. Not implying it will happen. But you should have understood the point to begin with.

STDs are spread because idiots won't use condoms. What kind of planet do you come from?
 
STDs are spread because idiots won't use condoms. What kind of planet do you come from?

Condoms are much needed in this world. But they are not full proof. On the wide scale, condoms offer resistance to the spread of STD's, it's no solution.

Again, if the world can get their shit together (which is not happening), STD's can be quarantined. The secret to doing this is within the Laws of the highest.

Right or wrong ?
 
Condoms are much needed in this world. But they are not full proof. On the wide scale, condoms offer resistance to the spread of STD's, it's no solution.

Again, if the world can get their shit together (which is not happening), STD's can be quarantined. The secret to doing this is within the Laws of the highest.

Right or wrong ?

WRONG. I don't believe in God, so I don't have to listen to the Laws of the Highest, if that's what your insinuating. Not to mention the fact that most STDs are treatable with medication, including some of the really bad ones. AIDs and Herpes cannot be stopped because of the way the virus works. AIDs becomes part of your genetic code, so it can't really be reversed unless we were able to take it out of every cell in your body. Herpes, I believe, hides in the spinal cord--which is a dangerous place to be poking around in.

Even if everyone conformed to your belief system, it still wouldn't stop the spread of other diseases. Either way, you're going to die. Might as well go out fucking if you're going to do it.

STDs are needed. We have to get dumbfucks out of this world some how.

Right or wrong?

RIGHT. I laughed for about five minutes when I saw this.
 
It's not a matter if you believe in God or not. It's easy to see why STD's would not be spread around as they do now, if we only slept with 1 person. Any fool can see that, including you, which is why you resort to nasty behavior. You can have the last word if you'd like, you're too hard headed for me.
 
It's not a matter if you believe in God or not. It's easy to see why STD's would not be spread around as they do now, if we only slept with 1 person. Any fool can see that, including you, which is why you resort to nasty behavior. You can have the last word if you'd like, you're too hard headed for me.

Or you could fuck around as much as you want, and not get STD's anyway, by using condoms.

That way, by using condoms, STD's wouldn't spread in the world, and we can still do what's most pleasurable, fuck around like bunnies. Which is what we're ment to do anyway, looking at it from a pure natural and evolutionary point of view.

Its natural selection. The idiots die from AIDS, the smart people plant their seeds to reap the benefits. Thus making mankind a better species in the future. Its a win/win situation.

Now, I'm not etirely positive, but if I remmber right, not even 0.1% of the entire population in Sweden have AIDs. And a great majority of those that have AIDS, are 35+. So theoretically, I can fuck over 999 girls in my age group, without using a condom, and still not get AIDS. Man, I have a lot of catching up to do.

Of course, that's ignoring the other STD's, which is why I still use a condom. So assuming a condom is only 80% protection, my calculations tell me I can fuck 1798 girls, without getting AIDS.

Luckily, I'm no whore. So I have nothing to really worry about, no do I? To top it all off, I'm not attracted to girls that have "FUCK ME" tattooed on their forehead, and "Welcome!" tatooed over their more private areas.
 
Last edited:
It's not a matter if you believe in God or not. It's easy to see why STD's would not be spread around as they do now, if we only slept with 1 person. Any fool can see that, including you, which is why you resort to nasty behavior. You can have the last word if you'd like, you're too hard headed for me.

No, I'm saying that you can't force religion down people's throats and hope it destroys their rampant hormones.

People want to have sex. Your god made us that way. Just because you're a dried up desert doesn't mean the rest of us are. Sex is a high-five from evolution, and I plan to take full advantage of it.

Uzor, also, makes a good point. Personally, I'm just finding more and more reasons to want to bash you. :\
 
Its natural selection. The idiots die from AIDS, the smart people plant their seeds to reap the benefits. Thus making mankind a better species in the future. Its a win/win situation.

Uh, no. HIV/AIDS doesn't render you sterile, so you're still free to reproduce.
 
Uh, no. HIV/AIDS doesn't render you sterile, so you're still free to reproduce.
Yes, but your children can inherit it, which kills them off :P
 
Yes, but your children can inherit it, which kills them off :P

Yeah but thats not the childs fault :/

A good amount of the epidemic currently going on in Africa is spread because of rape via war. The women, who cannot abort due to lack of funds/facilities (if they wanted to, of course) have these children sometimes unknowingly that they've even contracted the disease until the symptoms are far too advanced. Watch some of those documentaries and read some of those books (not saying you haven't already, but for the general populace), they're fucking heartbreaking.

I can agree with some of the points made about 'Yes! It was put here to get rid of the stupid people!' not only because it makes me giggle, but because its kind of right. Since natural selection does not happen in the typical way (the weak dieing off not long after birth, etc.) Nature has found another way by appealing to our weakness. Pleasure. The stupid people sometimes force their stupidity (yay redundance) on others, like some of the cases mentioned in the above paragraph.
 
That's not even close to 100% transmission, so that example still falls flat.

Yes, but evolution isn't 100% either :P

Let's say every couple get 2 kids. That's 1 kid per person.
Let's say 50% of the population is stupid and don't use a condom.
Let's say 10% of these stupid people get AIDS
Let's say the original population is 10000 people.

That means 500 people contract AIDS, which gives them 500 kids. If 10% of these kids get AIDS from birth, that's 500 stupid people gone, with only 450 surviving kids! So after a couple of generations, all of the stupid people will be gone! Or at least be a minority.

This is, obviously, very good for the world, as it have way too many stupid people.
 
Yes, but evolution isn't 100% either :P

Let's say every couple get 2 kids. That's 1 kid per person.
Let's say 50% of the population is stupid and don't use a condom.
Let's say 10% of these stupid people get AIDS
Let's say the original population is 10000 people.

That means 500 people contract AIDS, which gives them 500 kids. If 10% of these kids get AIDS from birth, that's 500 stupid people gone, with only 450 surviving kids! So after a couple of generations, all of the stupid people will be gone! Or at least be a minority.

This is, obviously, very good for the world, as it have way too many stupid people.

You should watch the movie Idiocracy you will find things do work that way.
 
No, I'm saying that you can't force religion down people's throats and hope it destroys their rampant hormones.

I'm not stuffing religion in anyones throats. I was agreeing with someones statement and adding how the commandments are not there to control us, it's there to protect us. Condoms are not as old as the Bible nor are they indestructible. Some of them do fail. You should have known that.

Alyada said:
People want to have sex. Your god made us that way. Just because you're a dried up desert doesn't mean the rest of us are. Sex is a high-five from evolution, and I plan to take full advantage of it.

Uzor, also, makes a good point. Personally, I'm just finding more and more reasons to want to bash you. :\

Uzor is stereotypical towards religious people, and personally i couldn't be bothered with who or what either of you fool around with.

Yeah it's all fun and games until you're loved one fucks around on you. Married people are positive it'll never happen.

Point in case. The laws in the Bible is made to protect us. Any religion would tell you that. Pagans believe what you do will come back to haunt you X3.
 
Back
Top