December 21, 2012 and Planet X

Yes, but evolution isn't 100% either :P

Let's say every couple get 2 kids. That's 1 kid per person.
Let's say 50% of the population is stupid and don't use a condom.
Let's say 10% of these stupid people get AIDS
Let's say the original population is 10000 people.

That means 500 people contract AIDS, which gives them 500 kids. If 10% of these kids get AIDS from birth, that's 500 stupid people gone, with only 450 surviving kids! So after a couple of generations, all of the stupid people will be gone! Or at least be a minority.

This is, obviously, very good for the world, as it have way too many stupid people.

A world that can suppress the urge long enough to eliminate a disease like HIV. It's more impressive than this one.

The problem is everyone thinks about themselves and not the future of the little people.

It's true that we're overpopulated, but as individuals it's ok for all of us to be here. Who are any of you to say stupid people should die.

Sounds like I'm talking to modern day Nazi's, or some force of supremacy.
 
A world that can suppress the urge long enough to eliminate a disease like HIV. It's more impressive than this one.

The problem is everyone thinks about themselves and not the future of the little people.

It's true that we're overpopulated, but as individuals it's ok for all of us to be here. Who are any of you to say stupid people should die.

Sounds like I'm talking to modern day Nazi's, or some force of supremacy.

Well since the Pope was a Nazi I will assume you are calling us a bunch of modern day Pope's! Since it was you who said:

Name calling is childish, and false accusations is weak don't you know ?

I know you wouldn't actually call us all Nazi's. I think the point Uzor was making was not that we should kill them but eventually because of their stupidity they will stop existing.
 
Well since the Pope was a Nazi I will assume you are calling us a bunch of modern day Pope's!

Why mention the Pope ? I don't admire or follow that guy.


duncanrun said:
I know you wouldn't actually call us all Nazi's. I think the point Uzor was making was not that we should kill them but eventually because of their stupidity they will stop existing.

Obviously it's not about any of you killing them. It's very negative to accept a killer to remain here to wipe out a type of person you don't like.

We all like it when we have a good alliance. But in real life this alliance is very poor. Again, a world that can work together, will evolve quickly.

I'm not here to say what people should do. But that doesn't mean people should try to silence me when i say, not fucking around long enough will rid the world of STD's. The people aren't interested in being a part of that. Which is fine, but fact remains, STD's go down with the person they kill.
 
I'm not stuffing religion in anyones throats. I was agreeing with someones statement and adding how the commandments are not there to control us, it's there to protect us. Condoms are not as old as the Bible nor are they indestructible. Some of them do fail. You should have known that.



Uzor is stereotypical towards religious people, and personally i couldn't be bothered with who or what either of you fool around with.

Yeah it's all fun and games until you're loved one fucks around on you. Married people are positive it'll never happen.

Point in case. The laws in the Bible is made to protect us. Any religion would tell you that. Pagans believe what you do will come back to haunt you X3.

Common sense was also created to protect us, how come there is no religion about that?

It's point AND case. Also, "The laws in the Bible is made to protect us." sounds like something constructed by a third grader. How old are you again?

Seriously, I'm done with this dumbfuck thread.
 
You should watch the movie Idiocracy you will find things do work that way.
Already seen it.
I'm not stuffing religion in anyones throats. I was agreeing with someones statement and adding how the commandments are not there to control us, it's there to protect us. Condoms are not as old as the Bible nor are they indestructible. Some of them do fail. You should have known that.



Uzor is stereotypical towards religious people, and personally i couldn't be bothered with who or what either of you fool around with.

Yeah it's all fun and games until you're loved one fucks around on you. Married people are positive it'll never happen.

Point in case. The laws in the Bible is made to protect us. Any religion would tell you that. Pagans believe what you do will come back to haunt you X3.
I'm not, really. I'm stereotypical about Christians that believe everything stated in the bible is true.
 
Well since the Pope was a Nazi I will assume you are calling us a bunch of modern day Pope's! Since it was you who said:



I know you wouldn't actually call us all Nazi's. I think the point Uzor was making was not that we should kill them but eventually because of their stupidity they will stop existing.
Why mention the Pope ? I don't admire or follow that guy.




Obviously it's not about any of you killing them. It's very negative to accept a killer to remain here to wipe out a type of person you don't like.

We all like it when we have a good alliance. But in real life this alliance is very poor. Again, a world that can work together, will evolve quickly.

I'm not here to say what people should do. But that doesn't mean people should try to silence me when i say, not fucking around long enough will rid the world of STD's. The people aren't interested in being a part of that. Which is fine, but fact remains, STD's go down with the person they kill.
Good job. You start to see my point Anttaru.

Stupid people will die, its the law of natural selection. Stupid people spread STD's, so when stupid people stop existing, so will STD's.

Forcing everyone to be abstinent won't happen, ever, and even if it did, people would break that law just as the file sharing law is broken. Thus, the only solution is to encourage people to use protection. Thus, STD's will be less common. And people won't have to stop having sex.

Sadly, stupid people will always exist. And thus, STD's.
 
Good job. You start to see my point Anttaru.

I don't see it the same as you. The infected are already dust.

We can't cure it but we can put an end to the spread if we "all" stopped screwing around long enough. I know it's not happening, but if we were going to do this it would mean letting the infected people go.

Uzor said:
Stupid people will die, its the law of natural selection. Stupid people spread STD's, so when stupid people stop existing, so will STD's.

What about the smart people that get caught up with these "stupid people" who are unaware this person is infected with the virus ?

In many cases it's not like people wait for others to bring them a physical report. If a woman were engaging, turned out to be HIV positive, would you trust the condom ? Or would you not bone her ?

The Point in the matter is, you won't know without the hassle of waiting for test results.

I applaud anyone who undergoes this process to say the least. Not happening on spontaneous arousal.

Somewhere along the evolutionary path, there has to be a point where Nature is no longer the master of us. The only way that can happen is if our heads are screwed on properly. On the whole they are not. Otherwise we'd destroy all things that threaten our existence. AIDS is still here. The only way to kill it is co-operation.

Uzor said:
Forcing everyone to be abstinent won't happen, ever, and even if it did, people would break that law just as the file sharing law is broken. Thus, the only solution is to encourage people to use protection. Thus, STD's will be less common. And people won't have to stop having sex.

Sadly, stupid people will always exist. And thus, STD's.

Still more impressive to quarantine it. There are everyday people out there who are unaware they are the result of a busted condom. Laughable indeed.
 
Last edited:
Somewhere along the evolutionary path, there has to be a point where Nature is no longer the master of us. The only way that can happen is if our heads are screwed on properly. On the whole they are not. Otherwise we'd destroy all things that threaten our existence. AIDS is still here. The only way to kill it is co-operation.
No. Nature has always, and will always, be our master. We're Nature's little puppets in his giant puppet show. Whether our heads are screwed on properly or not, Nature will be our masters. Now and for all future. Although I know we mean "heads screwed on properly" different. You mean it by devoting ourselves to a religion. I mean it by not devoting ourselves to a religion and realize what the world is really like.

This naturally does not apply to all religious people, as some religious people are well-aware of how the world works, and are mainly only religious in the way that they believe a God created matter.
 
I don't mean it by devoting ourselves to religion. What i mean in this example is that religion is correct in this case, as it is in many.

Lets say in order to kill HIV the world would have to go a month without sex, just for example. Are we strong enough to eliminate it ? Probably not. And realistically it would take many years to rid our species of this plague. Had our race done this for us in the past, we'd have a world wide holiday of honor.

If a world can do that. If.

We do work together to earn a living. It's our instinct to do so. But it's all business, which is why we can't overcome some things. It's not a matter of being religious or not, it's about advancement. More people = more discovery/invention.
 
Religion is only correct because religion is based on social morals and ethics. Not the other way around. Almost every religion have similar morals and ethics. Man created religion. Man also created society.
 
Religion is only correct because religion is based on social morals and ethics. Not the other way around. Almost every religion have similar morals and ethics. Man created religion. Man also created society.

QFT. There is no God. Get used to it.
 
QFT. There is no God. Get used to it.

While i agree there is no god. I have to say it isn't our place to constantly say so. We're no better then those psycho religion freaks who force their god on us. Everyone needs something to believe in to get them through the day. Whether it's god, nothing, or evolution. The only time it's really right to say theres no god to Christians is when they become psycho about it. Hell, I did that in Jamaica and it was fun.
 
But, but, Myrrh... we.. there's.. there's science! And logic! How are we not supposed to defend that at any chance?
 
I'm not putting my foot in someone's doorway and read from the revelation about how God will unleash his wrath on people, now am I? I'm just stating my opinion. They can chose to listen or not, unlike those annoying Jehovah's Witnesses people >.< Seriously, you have to punch them in the face and then close the door to even get them out...
 
But, but, Myrrh... we.. there's.. there's science! And logic! How are we not supposed to defend that at any chance?

I'm not saying we shouldn't defend logic but this is a public forum and there are a lot of god believing people here who aren't like the rest and don't deserve to have their faith insulted. A lot of people would get pissed and then freak out and thus become a psycho religion freak. It's a mean cycle. We all need to respect everyones choices because we have free will. I haven't read most of the posts since it became about god and I'm trying to stay out of it but we need to be respectful.
 
I'm not saying we shouldn't defend logic but this is a public forum and there are a lot of god believing people here who aren't like the rest and don't deserve to have their faith insulted. A lot of people would get pissed and then freak out and thus become a psycho religion freak. It's a mean cycle. We all need to respect everyones choices because we have free will. I haven't read most of the posts since it became about god and I'm trying to stay out of it but we need to be respectful.

Maybe you SHOULD read it. You'll see that we're perfectly respectful.
 
I don't need to read it to see you telling people on a public forum there is no god. That's just as bad as gay bashing and hating black people. You're being disrespectful to the persons choices. If you want to continue saying theres no god to him then take it to Pms. Be respectful to all choices.
 
I don't need to read it to see you telling people on a public forum there is no god. That's just as bad as gay bashing and hating black people. You're being disrespectful to the persons choices. If you want to continue saying theres no god to him then take it to Pms. Be respectful to all choices.
If you're not going to read it, then don't bother posting. He's posting his evangelic revelations, and we're responding to that. I'm not going to sit here and agree with him to make him happy.

He's also stating that if everyone followed the words of the bible, there would be no AIDS and STD's. Once again, I'm not going to sit here and agree with him to make him happy.

Its not about being disrespectful or respectful. Which you would have seen had you actually bothered reading the thread.

Its the same thing as a black person stating that all white people are stupid and moronic. Does it make me a racist to state that Black people aren't the best people in the world? Should I sit back and agree with him to make him happy?

You don't see me bashing on Celv's religion questioning his faith, for example. I'm talking to Ant, and respond to his claims. That's not bashing religion.
 
Last edited:
Except being gay or black is genetic. I can't hate on those people (and not that I would, being black or gay doesn't make you, generically, a moron) but Christians have a choice.

Their choice, however, is clouded by fear. I'm not one for ultimatums, but when a preacher told me: "You either believe in god or go to hell." I lost all faith in everything. How could someone, who preaches love and tolerance, say that?

Logic dictates that hell is a form of control. Every mom and dad says: "Don't do this or we'll get blah-blah to get you." and it works on children. Through fear, you can control anything. And with enough moms and dads telling little kids if they don't pray to the Jebus that they'll go to hell.. well, you see where I'm going.
 
Then take it to Pms. Again, the point you seem to be missing is that you are insulting an entire religion on a PUBLIC forum. Defend away but don't generalize people in religions. Anttaru could calm down a bit too with the whole Aids thing. That part I did read and found it funny.

I'm not defending god at all. I'm defending the people who aren't morons about religion.
 
Back
Top