Zealot X said:
i don't know which english-speaking country you're from, but good luck is not always used in a parting ways context. i.e. you tell someone good luck, you're wishing them luck.
ps... your member's name is nikki, not nikky.
i don't know which english-speaking country you're from, but good luck is not always used in a parting ways context. i.e. you tell someone good luck, you're wishing them luck.
ps... your member's name is nikki, not nikky.
yanzi said:
he didnt say always. what's your point?
Telling some one good luck after being dicked over makes 0 sense. Maybe luck means "What is your fuckin deal, give me my Byakko's Haidate" in chinese, but I wouldn't know.
_Neosquall_ said:
so you admit BOL dicked him over?
You know I was thinking of changing that when i re-read, but i didn't think anyone would be that swift. oh well
Your response is functionally pleasing but isn't directed at the points I've brought up. I never complained about you breaking Nikki's pearl nor removing forum access, or in general any of the basic policies you used. I commented on the hypocrisies I found apparent in statements in several member's argument about how they see the distribution of wealth fair.
I noted how certain people were benefited on both ways of rule changes and pointed out how it's odd they should feel so strongly for one system or the other. I never commented on people being wrong to enforce those rules on their book, although it seems apparent to me either Pheona did not present to Nikki all her possible options or merely Nikki is a liar.
But it seems funny to me, to be arguing with a person's right to colide with certain rules that they themself throughout their FF career seemed to float always in the direction that merely benefited them most. From saying a person shouldn't get Haidates because they play another job more often to saying they want Haidates when they can't even wear them. It's not about rules, it's not about policies but basic hypocrisy and opportunism.
I noted how certain people were benefited on both ways of rule changes and pointed out how it's odd they should feel so strongly for one system or the other. I never commented on people being wrong to enforce those rules on their book, although it seems apparent to me either Pheona did not present to Nikki all her possible options or merely Nikki is a liar.
But it seems funny to me, to be arguing with a person's right to colide with certain rules that they themself throughout their FF career seemed to float always in the direction that merely benefited them most. From saying a person shouldn't get Haidates because they play another job more often to saying they want Haidates when they can't even wear them. It's not about rules, it's not about policies but basic hypocrisy and opportunism.
Okay, again, why do you care so much? There was never a problem, just miscommunication. The leaders aren't setting rules up to benefit them. Is this not enough for you to believe in because I'm sure i can turn this into another OH's bank topic.
This will be a long and pointless little chat if people will only answer questions I haven't asked or ask me over and over again why I care to ask the question. I ask out of curiosity, personal amusement, spite, whatever, take your pick.
Guess it's gonna be awhile before you're amused then, I don't feel like tending to your needs.
Its gonna be "Calbrone takes Haidate for NIN when he comes to everything as BLM" I can see it now...