GEORGE BUSH DOESN'T CARE ABOUT TARUTARU

Status
Not open for further replies.
OK; i call bullshit on at least 50% of this thread thusfar, those among you that get pissy can eat me and include yourselves in the slander that is oncoming.

Firstly:

raivyn said:
Hey cubs,

Do me a favor please and just make a "Come slander bush with no evidence or sense" thread so I can avoid it and not get suckered into posting in what I think could be a good debate when really all it turns out to be is baseless drivel.

Thanks,
Steve.

Way to come off as intelligent making a biased statement and intentionally trashing people with different views from yours. You, sir, are quite the cerebral type.

darkdante said:
Hey Cubs

Just state that in this thread that it is ok for Dumb Mutherfuckers who support Bush and don't even know what the fuck is going on, can post for comic relief for all parties involved.

Although this may pass as a snappy comeback you've defeated yourself in your first post. Good job.

raivyn said:
Actually how about you stop looking for a way to take pot-shots at me. First and last time I'll say anything about this - quit looking at my posts and trying to think of a lame/sarcastic/witty response to them. If you have something to say and you can say it in a respectful manner then say it, if not just stop replying. Place me on your ignore list or something.

Get a fucking helmet, your first post was begging for someone to call you a sanctimonious asswipe (this is the flameboard, jackass).

Let's cut the bullshit and i'll state the obvious: raivyn and darkdante are both incredibly juvenile and sanctimonious on their political views and like to draw attention to that fact by making asses of themselves and then crying foul on the issue by way of taking an argument or debate to the level of "doo-doo head" and "stop stalking me" respectively.

Moving on to all of you who thought it was a good idea to flame cubs for making a political debate sticky once a month to clear up some trash on the boards; you're a bit late. It's a small wonder this response came now as it is currently in fashion (apperantly) to flame cubs for breathing. A month ago when this started sure .. no prob, bitch and whine. It's a bit stupid now and only shows how many late bloomers are just out for some attention.

3 pages and not ONE actual political point made, good going to all of you. Way to stick it to the man.
 
Mokk said:
OK; i call bullshit on at least 50% of this thread thusfar, those among you that get pissy can eat me and include yourselves in the slander that is oncoming.

Firstly:

raivyn said:
Hey cubs,

Do me a favor please and just make a "Come slander bush with no evidence or sense" thread so I can avoid it and not get suckered into posting in what I think could be a good debate when really all it turns out to be is baseless drivel.

Thanks,
Steve.

Way to come off as intelligent making a biased statement and intentionally trashing people with different views from yours. You, sir, are quite the cerebral type.

darkdante said:
Hey Cubs

Just state that in this thread that it is ok for Dumb Mutherfuckers who support Bush and don't even know what the fuck is going on, can post for comic relief for all parties involved.

Although this may pass as a snappy comeback you've defeated yourself in your first post. Good job.

raivyn said:
Actually how about you stop looking for a way to take pot-shots at me. First and last time I'll say anything about this - quit looking at my posts and trying to think of a lame/sarcastic/witty response to them. If you have something to say and you can say it in a respectful manner then say it, if not just stop replying. Place me on your ignore list or something.

Get a fucking helmet, your first post was begging for someone to call you a sanctimonious asswipe (this is the flameboard, jackass).

Let's cut the bullshit and i'll state the obvious: raivyn and darkdante are both incredibly juvenile and sanctimonious on their political views and like to draw attention to that fact by making asses of themselves and then crying foul on the issue by way of taking an argument or debate to the level of "doo-doo head" and "stop stalking me" respectively.

Moving on to all of you who thought it was a good idea to flame cubs for making a political debate sticky once a month to clear up some trash on the boards; you're a bit late. It's a small wonder this response came now as it is currently in fashion (apperantly) to flame cubs for breathing. A month ago when this started sure .. no prob, bitch and whine. It's a bit stupid now and only shows how many late bloomers are just out for some attention.

3 pages and not ONE actual political point made, good going to all of you. Way to stick it to the man.

To be fair trippy did try...and that picture of bush burning tarus was funny :P.

Btw i wish more people would come up with good witty comebacks, as they can be so entertaining.
 
Mokk said:
OK; i call bullshit on at least 50% of this thread thusfar, those among you that get pissy can eat me and include yourselves in the slander that is oncoming.

Firstly:

raivyn said:
Hey cubs,

Do me a favor please and just make a "Come slander bush with no evidence or sense" thread so I can avoid it and not get suckered into posting in what I think could be a good debate when really all it turns out to be is baseless drivel.

Thanks,
Steve.

Way to come off as intelligent making a biased statement and intentionally trashing people with different views from yours. You, sir, are quite the cerebral type.

darkdante said:
Hey Cubs

Just state that in this thread that it is ok for Dumb Mutherfuckers who support Bush and don't even know what the fuck is going on, can post for comic relief for all parties involved.

Although this may pass as a snappy comeback you've defeated yourself in your first post. Good job.

raivyn said:
Actually how about you stop looking for a way to take pot-shots at me. First and last time I'll say anything about this - quit looking at my posts and trying to think of a lame/sarcastic/witty response to them. If you have something to say and you can say it in a respectful manner then say it, if not just stop replying. Place me on your ignore list or something.

Get a fucking helmet, your first post was begging for someone to call you a sanctimonious asswipe (this is the flameboard, jackass).

Let's cut the bullshit and i'll state the obvious: raivyn and darkdante are both incredibly juvenile and sanctimonious on their political views and like to draw attention to that fact by making asses of themselves and then crying foul on the issue by way of taking an argument or debate to the level of "doo-doo head" and "stop stalking me" respectively.

Moving on to all of you who thought it was a good idea to flame cubs for making a political debate sticky once a month to clear up some trash on the boards; you're a bit late. It's a small wonder this response came now as it is currently in fashion (apperantly) to flame cubs for breathing. A month ago when this started sure .. no prob, bitch and whine. It's a bit stupid now and only shows how many late bloomers are just out for some attention.

3 pages and not ONE actual political point made, good going to all of you. Way to stick it to the man.

Albeit my first post was quite inflammatory there was a reason. Cubs made a political debate thread for people to debate, not a place to come in and waste time by trying to pass of bias as intellect. As you said, and as I have said before, get a helmet. This is a flameboard. If this was general discussion forum I would have kept my mouth shut, but seeing as it isn't I vented/stirred up trouble.

I have no problem with someone who has views opinions or beliefs radically different than or in opposition to mine. You, Mokk, are one person I respect in your ability to maintain 'civil' discussion and display respect. Dante and Hippy are a different story. Like I said - I come into a debate thread and expect to see debate, not "Harriet Miers is batshit insane" and then a witty "lol yeh hes a dumbfuck" addon. That generally pisses me off. Going back to my first post I insulted no one but those who cannot make a coherent argument and support it on their own, and resort rather to restating the arguments of others and trying to pass it off.

As long as we're cutting through the bullshit here it is: a thread for debate which has been taken essentially off topic due to bias just plain pisses me off. The same can be said for dante - who spends 30% of his time trolling my posts and responding with a vice-versa type juvenile argument. Telling a dumb kid to go away does not make my political views juvenile.

My high and mighty attitude coming into this thread however does in fact make me an asshole, just while we're at it. :wink:
 
fair enough.

Wish cubs haden't deleted last months topic, the last couple posts were probably the best i've ever read on here made in the name of politics.

No that's not a flame :P i told cubs exactly what i thought of his moderating in a PM and we can both rest assured i'll be the last person to sling mud at him for anything relating to it.

Now then .. get on with the actual political conversation! :lol:

So far these past 3 pages have been proof that althought everyone has their personal beliefs no one cares enough about their convictions to actually make a valid point which makes me a sad panda while i sit here and wait for EVE to come back online.
 
this forum needs a sad panda face :(

While I personally do not agree with von on a few things I do respect his opinion, and can definitely see why you would be enthused.

It is a shame that the thread was deleted, I could have just linked it when dante responded and been done with it. That thread also had some solid goodies, but I was aching for accurate quotations.
 
Anyone care to bring up the topic of Roe V. Wade abortion rulings? If not disregard. I find it interesting though and it is comming back up soon with the hardcore conservatives pwnin the courts.
 
Probably easier just to state your stance on abortion in general though.

Me? not really sure but I'd think it would be more the woman's decision.

Not some courts.
 
unless you are the guy that is gonna get nailed with 18 years of child support from some sack chasing bitch.
 
haha. Ya but thats after the fact Meeze.

If you have to pay child support or not should not be the deciding factor for ending a "life". If thats what an embryo is anywayz.

Besides, nobody makes a man not wear protection. Every man is in control of himself.
 
Roe V. Wade?! This could get scary lol.

I'm anti-abortion. I picked that up when I was a christian. I've dropped christianity, but abortion still feels wrong for me. So... that's my arguement.. Dunno. I guess it all depends on when you feel that life begins.

Difficult topic.

I do with Bush's parents had aborted him though. lol.
 
pakomen said:
I do with Bush's parents had aborted him though. lol.
/joke

well, sorta
 
Darkdante said:
haha. Ya but thats after the fact Meeze.

If you have to pay child support or not should not be the deciding factor for ending a "life". If thats what an embryo is anywayz.

Besides, nobody makes a man not wear protection. Every man is in control of himself.

I just don't agree with letting the women decide on a baby made by 2 people.

just as easily as you say "every man is in control of himself" nobody made the woman spread her legs with no birthcontrol. Every woman is in control of herself.

if it is my seed in a woman, i want a say so in what is going on.
 
Trippyhippy said:
Good job, a political Discussion debate with no topic made in the flameboard so cubs can moderate it when his best arguement ends up being "nuh-uh".

How bout a discussion on the topic of Harriet Miers, the newest nominee for Sandra Day O'Conners seat on the Supreme court.

Surely we can all ageree this was a bad decision, no?
If you read her blog, she says:

Does anyone have any good recommendations of general books on Constitutional Law, history of the Supreme Court, etc? THANX!!!
Please, tell me this blog is a joke. lol. A supreme court appointee asking for advice on constitutional law books? :lol:
 
Juicy topic. Some details in the following that are probabally a bit on the "TMI" side, but fuck it, I don't really care.

Few years back I worked with this girl at a Record Store. She was cute, and apparently stupid too (since she slept with me) so we screwed in the backseat of my Mustang. Low and behold, she got preggers :shock: Having known each other for a whopping two weeks, we opted for the abortion. So, in this sense, I suppose you could call me Pro-Abortion, since this would have seriously fucked my life up.

If Abortion were to be illegalized, I shudder to think of the alternate paths people would take to discard unwanted pregnancy. I have horrible visions of the shitty movie that on at midnight where the guy gets a bullet taken out by a disbarred Vetrinarian or some shit like that. Abortion just dosen't seem like it should be a back-alley coathanger deal. So I suppose from this aspect, I can once again be considered Pro-Abortion.

What I cannot ever hope to even begin to contemplate, is what a Woman who goes through such a procedure must feel physically, and emotionally. At the risk of being a complete and total asshole, I will say I imagine it would be a very devistating experience on multiple levels. Devistating enough to be outlawed? Not in my opinion.

I suppose I am Pro-Abortion. I really hate to think of an entire nation full of people as fucking stupid as me and the above mentioned Record Store chick were having absolutley no option but to ruin their lives. I really don't see any political body having the balls, in my lifetime at least, to make a solid, concisive decision on this issue. I don't think any party wants to be the one to fuck with this. The nation is just too divided on it.

Do I offer any solutions? Nope. Is my opinion ignorant, yup. I can't pretend to be as emotionally involved in this as most others are since I have no children. Emotion and Logic have never really melded together though.

Oh, PS I suppose. Anyone know whats up with that experimental abortive drug, RU-487 (think that was it) It was experimental back in 99 when this happened to me. Supposedly it was legal in like Holland or something, but had very stringent guidelines and restrictions making it near impossible to get in Sacramento.
 
Harriet Miers.....

Just anohter flunky of Bush. Only reason he's appointing her is because she's been sucking his dick for last decade. His PERSONAL lawyer, she's also his current Deputy Chief of Staff for policy.

She's never been a judge before, she's Christian. I'm not christian but I do like alot of things about the religion. Bush puts a sick feeling in my stomach for alot of Christians though.

This is what happens when you elect someone President simply on daddy's name. That and when you have dumbass Democrats thinking an "Al Gore" can beat him.
 
Darkdante said:
Good job Mokk.

I really wanna say more about this guy but.

I'll leave it at that for now.


:lol:

No, this says it all really.
 
In terms of abortion I really agree with Von here. I'm for it myself - but I don't see anyone making any actual changes anytime soon. Especially considering we have many more problems at the moment.

Kinda one of those dividing issues that people like to harp on as a decent gauge of bias and or conviction, pending on your viewpoint.

It's not a very concrete issue at all from any stanpoint - especially medical, so its difficult to talk about it being that there is no conclusive reasoning towards either side of the argument.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top