GEORGE BUSH DOESN'T CARE ABOUT TARUTARU

[Darkdante]

Life begins as soon as both the sperm and the egg join together, conception. How do I know? Well, just take a look at what happens as soon as they join together: they start growing (dividing into more cells), which is a characteristic trait of life.

What life do I take everyday? And, for the millionth time, it's to establish when life begins for the future human being. The mere fact that it will be a human being is enough to make it important, like a kid, you know it's gonna be an adult.

See the problem with religious types and scientific information is that you really don't understand what you are discribing. You used the first quote as your definition of "life".

How is sperm made? By cell division. This by your definition means it also has life. Does having "life" automatically mean its now "human"?

Why is a zygote more human than a sperm? Why is a zygote the same as a human being with a brain, heart, lungs, arms, legs, which a zygote does not have. The problem with your definition is that you simply are not thinking things through and are just trying to find anyway possible to defend your position.

How do you take life everyday? Anything biological that dies by your hand now is you taking a "life". This totally absurd way to look at things is your view. You of course like all religious people back off this view when questioned, now your saying that its a human life.

Ok now what makes a human being human? Before you answer lets state that it is possible to clone human beings now, so potential can be applied to a simple thing as sperm now can't it?

So if you kill sperm your now taking human life? There must be something more that defines something as human than mere similarity or origin of said genetic material.

I'll be damned (the expression, I'm not talking religiously atm) if I don't have the baby.

You live in a dream world Answa. Its a nice place to be, but a baby deserves a better life than one that you simply did not have the strength to save it from. Just because I don't have the strength to put down a horse with all its legs broke doesn't make me a good person. Acutally I'd look down upon someone that couldn't do it.

Its really nice when you sit in your big house, with oving parents, free school, free lunch, and bascially "good life" to say that its wrong to spare a child from a "bad life", and any life is more important. Its different when you've had to live that life yourself. I'm not saying that i'm like that, but I keep my eyes open enough to see that for myself.

Tadpoles will be frogs, zygotes will be human. Difference? Species and importance. Again, if you don't know the difference between a frog and a human, visit your local psychologist.

The hamburger bit was a little too stupid for me to answer it... It doesn't even make any sense.

People who are Pro-Life dont' say "Human" they say "Life". Because they know the moment they say Pro-Human they've lost the argument.

Is it a stupid stance to be in? Yes, my examples only proved that. Being Pro-Human at least you could then argue with me to the point that an embryo develops enough to be considered a human with a "consciousness ", at that point I'd agree with you as being wrong to have an abortion. The problem would be proving it.

And lastly what do you anti-abortion types think of the situation in China? Women there can have only one baby, and as it turns out they end up killing all thier girl babies. This is a reality that we could soon face, over-population is a reality. The only question is how much sooner you people want to face this reality.

 

[Darkdante]

"I never miss a chance to have sex."

I sure wish I could say this. I wish I was a dog, I wish I was a dog, but I"m not. Everytime I think of things like this, it makes me feel like a Raivyn.

But then I remember I'm actually a nice guy.

Bleh.......... :?

Its true nice guys finish last ya'no.

 

[Answa~]

Firstly, I'm not a "religious type", I'm Eduardo, don't stereotype me. Second, why don't you ever acknowledge when I'm right in your opinion? Third, I defined *human* life in my own way, which I think is right, since it's when it's actually growing to be a human. An unused sperm is a sperm. A sperm that reached its destination is called a zygote, with the egg.

And, actually, I'm not studying biology, I'm giving my opinion mixed with the few facts I know. It's what I consider to be true. This means that if it's not true, I'll retract it. I'm studying Chemistry, a Science.

Why is a zygote the same as a human being with a brain, heart, lungs, arms, legs, which a zygote does not have.

Why is a double amputee human? Triple? Quadruple? Potential and (fine, I'm saying it) soul. It's going to grow into a human, so it is of the human species, homo sapiens.

Anything biological that dies by your hand now is you taking a "life".

Again, what am I killing every day?

You live in a dream world Answa. Its a nice place to be, but a baby deserves a better life than one that you simply did not have the strength to save it from. Just because I don't have the strength to put down a horse with all its legs broke doesn't make me a good person. Actually I'd look down upon someone that couldn't do it.

It's not a dream world, it's hope. You know, the word I've repeated countless times. You have to have hope. If you don't actually pull through, you tried. Giving up before you even start is never the way to do anything.

A horse isn't a human being, don't compare a human to any animal, because they're not the same. I'm not talking about superiority, since a dog is not a horse, either. They're incomparable except in that you can say that they're quadrupeds, mammals, and vertebrates.

People who are Pro-Life don't say "Human" they say "Life". Because they know the moment they say Pro-Human they've lost the argument.

Why would they lose the argument?

How come everyone claiming life is sacred and abortion is wrong is usually pro death penalty?

Generalizations suck. Stereotypes suck. I'm not pro the death penalty, the Catholic Church is AGAINST the death penalty and AGAINST abortion. It's millions of people that conclusively render this remark as completely ignorant.

And, by the way, if you're going to use an absolute word, make sure you make it remain constant throughout the whole sentence.

 

[Konartist]

Generalizations suck. Stereotypes suck. I'm not pro the death penalty, the Catholic Church is AGAINST the death penalty and AGAINST abortion. It's millions of people that conclusively render this remark as completely ignorant.

Yeah cause half the popes/priest/pastors w/e deserve it.

Fuggin homo-pedo-rapists.

 

[Konartist]

And don't get into what churches are or are not against. They are for or against w/e makes them the most money. Churches are a business bottomline. And quite frankly it makes the most sense.

 

[Answa~]

Are you kidding me...?

Pope? Are you willing to stand by this completely... idiotic remark?

Priests who actually do that to their altar boys are the exception. A few do that, and immediately the whole Church is a bunch of pedophiles and rapists. Do me a favor, don't ever say anything remotely like this ever again. Not even close to half of the priests do this. And the ones that do made the error themselves when they became priests, when they gave in to temptation. Anyways, there's a thing called redemption which comes from being ashamed of your sins. But I kid myself in thinking you'll understand this.

The errors of individuals should not be reflected on a sole entity comprised of MUCH more individuals.

Money... the Church isn't a manufacturing company, they use that money to keep their priests alive and help people.

 

[Raivyn]

Only one dumbfuck here i'm disrespecting. Its YOU Raivyn.

Almost everybody else on this board shows some degree of intellegence. Especially to the point that they don't open up thier mouth when they don't understand something, or at least don't have an opinion of something.

Your like one of those dumbfucks that like to run off at the mouth that nobody really listens to except for a good laugh.

:lol:

$.$

Almost everybody else on this board shows some degree of intellegence.
...
Your like one of those dumbfucks that like to run off at the mouth that nobody really listens to except for a good laugh.

 

[Raivyn]

It's against having the choice to abort a fetus. Pro- Choice isn't for abortion. Noone is for abortion. People don't walk around the country looking for babies to kill.

Quick not before I go on a tirade;

How come your view of things is so skewed that it allows you to spew forth nonsense and actually believe it?

Dude - who the fuck would be FOR abortion? That makes no sense? Are you a reporter for cbs??? I love how you can be so literal yet so abstract when it is to your favor. You do realize that you are sugarcoating 'pro-choice' to the point of lunacy, don't you?

Noone is for abortion.

No, really? I thought there was an actual political wing dedicated to the destruction of the human race by means of halting reproduction.

Jesus - You people are like shapeshifters. PICK A POSITION ALREADY. Don't hype it up. We KNOW what is meant by 'pro-choice'.

How hypocritcal that you should call the apellation 'pro-life' slander.

 

[Raivyn]

No, my counterpoint is that most people don't look at 'Pro-Choice' and 'Pro-Life' and say "Well duher... if one is pro life then the other must be the literal opposite since they disagree, which makes them pro-death, omg i don't want to support pro-death".

Well that's not a valid arguement because I've seen people make that connection. Just because you have an ounce of common sense doesen't mean the rest of america does.

It is absolutely wonderful that you have seen people make that connection. Now please, before you continue doing the very thing you are falsely accusing me of doing (not fully reading/comprehending my post), go back and read what I wrote.

If you can tell me how "most people = all people" I will not only admit that my argument is invalid, but I will give you a nice cookie. As of now that is a completely valid argument.

My counterpoint is that people read and comprehend the english language and you are arguing semantics to make it seem as if the choice to term themselves the "Pro-Life" argument was a backwards attempt at slander of the opposing viewpoint. Jesus christ, like people have to sugar everything up for you. How does "Pro-human-fetus-right-to-being-able-to-be-born" sound to you? Is that better?

It is an attempt at slander and it works very well. And for the record, it's prolifers that sugar coat the term describing their stance.

Oh I see so you were there when they named themselves "Pro-Life"? Do you even know who gave them that name? If I had to guess I would say the media gave them that term, and that seems more than likely.

So how is the "Pro-ife" term being sugar coated? Don't say backwards slander and earn bonus points. How is it not an appropriate appellation? Is it cause some people, such as yourself, who have a chip on their shoulder, - and think anything connected with the right is out to get them - are offended because they think they are being called pro-death? Well then they can just go cry about it because they are far to sensitive to be productive.

Honestly man. Most intelligent people don't look at pro-choice and pro-life and inversely assume that pro-choicers are the devil. They are what they are. Pro-life = being for the support of human life in any form. Pro-choice = being for the option to abort a fetus if you so choose. Call a spade a spade.

It's too bad there are so many americans that aren't intelligent that do exactly what you said most of them don't do. Do you go out much? Ever been to the bible belt? Pro life = Against the right to make the decision to terminate a pregnancy. The REASON may be because life is sacred, but that is what their stance actually is.

"Most =! all". Sorry, that dog don't hunt.
Also, once again with all that "the Republicans are trying to take my rights away!" crap.

What part of the following do you not understand; Medical science and modern thought cannot say for sure at what stage a developing embryo should be considered human, thus it is all opinion.

We live in a nation of 'innocent till proven guilty' - that is why you have the 'right' to have an abortion. If at some point it is ruled that the zygote at its earliest stage is a human and american life, it will be protected by the constitution and all laws regarding people in these united states. Read carefully now. At that point, as is the view of some people now, abortion will become murder, and thus be illegal. You will no longer have the right to get an abortion because you will be killing a human. Do you now fully comprehend the other side of the argument?

Pro-Choice... They are for the right to choose whether or not to have a child. Prolife people are against the right to choose to have an abortion

What??? Ok, think of it anyway you want to think of it, but realize that you at least portray yourself to be quite far gone to the left. Blind ideology leads to things like this...

Conservatives aren't allowed to speak to me concerning blind ideaology. That is what being consrvative is all about. Traditional views and values. "It worked this long, it must be right!" Ignorance in its purest form.

Ah, is this code for "what I believe is right and you're stupid?". I'll take it as such.

Wonderful thing about this statement is that I'm not a conservative. Pardon me while I now continue to say exactly what I want about blind ideology.

By the way, wonderful way to reinforce my point about blind ideology. "Conservatives aren't allowed to speak to me concerning blind ideology (implied: or the issues at hand which I may be following blindly)" - why's that? They don't have anything valid to say because they are conservative? Pot... Kettle... Black.

Prolife people are against the right to choose to have an abortion

That sure looks like bias to me. Are they against the choice to abort? Well yeah, but what is the root of the issue? Is it the (what they consider to be) inalienable rights of the human growing inside of the mother? Yes. Does this lead to them being 'against the right to choose whether or not to have a child'? Yes. Does this mean that the country is being hijacked by right winged bible bangers who wish to use big-brother government to control you, brainwash you, slap you with the patriot act and omg TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHT to choose whether or not to have an abortion? NO. As of now you have the 'right' to have an abortion - but the debate now is, do you have the right to take a human life? No - so at what point is the baby considered human? Science can't answer it and religion is biased.

How come everyone claiming life is sacred and abortion is wrong is usually pro death penalty? Those are all views of the right side. I never metioned brainwashing or the patriot act as neither one of those things remotely has anything to do with the topic at hand.

I personally consider a baby human from the first cell division, but it isn't alive until it can live outside the womb. And yes that does put me in the category against partial birth abortions. Ya know, that rare procedure that almost never happens, especilly to a baby that is still alive when they do it.

Aside from not following my point about you screaming about rights (which I explained above), I never told you my stance on abortion, or the death penalty, so I have no frigging idea what you're talking about those for.

Pro-Choice... They are for the right to choose whether or not to have a child

Actually one could just say that they are pro-choosing to be irresponsible at this point. Choosing whether or not to have a baby is done by either putting the penis into the vagina as a means to reproduce or not.

Ever had a condom bust? Does that mean Trojan man should take care of the baby since it was his fault she got pregnant?

Doing what you do best - putting words into my mouth, manipulating my point, and being a hypocrite in regards to the previously mentioned idea of "not reading/comprehending posts".

So let me say it again. Choosing whether or not to have a baby is done by either putting the penis into the vagina as a means to reproduce or not. This means you should realize that any sexual activity could result in pregnancy and as a responsible individual you either man-up to the responsibility, or you avoid putting yourself in that position.

Besides, I don't want a man in a condom-suit to take care of my children.

Just because you don't see my point doesen't mean I'm going nowhere with my arugement. It just means you can't comprehend the things I'm saying. Too bad, you might learn something if you understood me.

Oh of course! What the fuck was I even thinking? I am too STUPID to understand ENGLISH. Everything you have said is so far beyond any level of comprehension I could ever hope to attain! This must be the answer! This is so much more complex than any philosophical or scientific text ever written!

What am I going to learn from you? That if I ever feel cornered a sure way out of any front end assault is to insult the intelligence of my opponent? No thanks, I don't wnt to learn how to tuck tail and hide behind fallacy.

I wasn't insulting your intelligence, I was simply stating that you can't follow my logic. And you can't. If you would examine my words more closely instead of instantly disagreeing with what i say, you may see that I have a valid point here and there.

I would like to know though, what fallacy am I hiding behind? The idea that you might want to have a discussion instead of choosing up sides and smelling armpits? It seems to me you are used to dealing with Darkdante and don't know what to think about someone that can argue calmly without paersonal insults.


Doody head.

Here's that abstract deniability again. If you weren't making a lame attempt at insulting my intelligence you would have avoided the topic altogether. If you were of the belief that I simply misinterpreted your posts you would have said "I don't believe you see what I'm saying" rather than "You can not comprehend my point". Stop pussyfooting around and take a stance. If you are going to call me stupid then do it and support it, don't tuck and run like a big ninny.

Your argument is entirely one dimensional, and you have yet to show how I am missing your point. Rather it seems like you have no real point to make.

The fallacy you were hiding behind is the supposed fact that I am simply 'too dumb to understand you', thus making all your points correct on some nonexistent meta-physical level. My point was quite clear, I can't believe you asked me to specify the fallacy.

Also as a point of reference; aligning yourself with and defending someone who time and time again proves their own ignorance so efficiently and succinctly that he effectively mops the floor with himself is never a good tactic. Nor is agreeing with his blatant use of unsubstantiated name calling. What do they call that all the time, a pro-tip?

well consider that a PRO-TIP.

 

[The Druw]

Seeing as how this is a political thread, I'll just say a few things I've had on my mind...

I hate the current political parties...hell I hate political parties in general.

I can't count the number of people in this country, that have chosen a "side" because their mommy and daddy have always been that. So they carry on the strong tradition. THINK FOR YOURSELF.

My message to the Right/Republican/Conservative:

SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. YES PRZ.
YOUR GOD IS NOT EVERYONE'S GOD.

I live in a country where freedom of religion is accepted. And yes, I -do- understand it has it's limitations. So don't waste time posting "zomg lolz what if someone's religion is bombing others!!11"

Zealots are in every religion. Some are just more dedicated than others.


To be honest, that is my biggest beef with them. If you wanna make a decision don't bring "god said so" into it. Thats a waste of my thought process.

My message to the Left/Liberal/Democrats:

STFU ABOUT YOUR FUCKING RIGHTS. WE KNOW YOU HAVE THEM. YOU KNOW YOU HAVE THEM. GTFO.

Jesus. I'm waiting for you to fight for a god damn Civil Right to Breathe, and for one of your minorities to stand up and complain about how their boss at work is infracting upon that.



To BOTH Parties:

Think, as an individual, ON YOUR OWN. Just because your party leader believes something is right doesn't mean it is. Just because -I- say something doesn't make it 100% Correct.

OMG ADMIT YOUR ERROR's. WHOOPITY FUCKING DO. You made a mistake, so you're gonna KEEP looking like a Dumbass? Here's an idea. "American People, we fucked up :/ But, here's what we're gonna do to fix it"

PULL YOUR HEADS, OUT OF YOUR ASSES.

Thats right ladies and gentleman, if one was to combine idea's from BOTH sides, come to a mutal agreement, then JUST MAYBE we'd have a situation that would benefit the entire population, not just one group.

Rofl. Compromise. XD What am I thinking. I'm sorry, Negate this entire post.

Shit, I almost had myself thinking that all of us working together was a good thing. lmao.

Pardon me, I have to go wipe my tears from laughing so hard.

 

[Vondoom]

That fence is lookin mighty good about now Von

C'mon up bud. There's no ethernet up here, but I do have beer and chicken. There's also a collection of branches, so at any given time you can poke either side with a stick! :roll:

 

[Raivyn]

C'mon up bud. There's no ethernet up here, but I do have beer and chicken. There's also a collection of branches, so at any given time you can poke either side with a stick! :roll:

Dude... this whole time I've been yammering on and I could've had some beer and chicken??? I am SO there!

 

[Trippyhippy]

A lot of things that make no sense to anyone but him.

I was going to quote your post and respond to each individual bit, but I decided I'd be wasting my time.

You can't see my point because you don't want to.

You put words in my mouth, you draw conclusions from nowhere, you insist I'm trying to call you stupid.

You use words that don't fit the context of what you are trying to say.

And another thing. [quote="Raivyn]Also as a point of reference; aligning yourself with and defending someone who time and time again proves their own ignorance so efficiently and succinctly that he effectively mops the floor with himself is never a good tactic. Nor is agreeing with his blatant use of unsubstantiated name calling. What do they call that all the time, a pro-tip? [/quote]

What the hell are you talking about? I aligned myself with noone. I am giving you my views and my views alone. I defended noone. If anything, I made a Stab at Darkdante by telling him he needs to quit calling people names and calm down.

I see why he's so angry now.

I'm over it. Arguing with you is like watching a bunch of retards trying to Fuck a Doorknob.

Where is Rones? I want some intelligent discussion.

 

[Darkdante]

Firstly, I'm not a "religious type"

Seriously Answa you are, be proud of your beliefs, and stand by them. Its the biggest reason I wanted to argue with you about this. The religious side is the other side of the argument. If you can explain your view to me in a way I can understand, well....

Thank you.

I've been posting here for awhile and alot of your posts you state your religious background and alot of your views comes from your beliefs. I respect that. Don't even try to say its possible to state your opinion without a shade of your religious beliefs in them, this aint possible. Will that stop me from trying to argue with you to understand you more? No, I want to understand you more dude.

Second, why don't you ever acknowledge when I'm right in your opinion?

YOur right about alot of things Answa. I'm not really posting to simply say I agree with you, I'm posting to understand that which I don't understand. If I agreed with you I wouldn't really be posting.

Your right when you say life begins at conception. I too belive this, but should the law state and force people to treat a zygote as a human being with human rights? Just because there is life does that mean its Human? There is difference here and what you say affects the outcome.

I dont believe a zygote should have the same rights as myself. I wouldn't want my wife to be guilty of manslaugter if she had a misscarraige, which is possible if a human dies from your hand, even though your not at fault. If a zygote dies from a misscarriage can the insane happen since it now has human rights and now the mother is guilty of manslaughter? I shudder at the thought. Alot of this stuff is crazy and no easy answers, but giving something that is not fully human as we are the same rights that we have, will lead to problems.

Third, I defined *human* life in my own way, which I think is right, since it's when it's actually growing to be a human. An unused sperm is a sperm. A sperm that reached its destination is called a zygote, with the egg.

Your right by your views then, but are you right in view of the laws that your beliefs will put in to power? Will these laws be fair?

Why is a double amputee human? Triple? Quadruple? Potential and (fine, I'm saying it) soul. It's going to grow into a human, so it is of the human species, homo sapiens.

Its easy to say its still human when all thats missing is appendages, none of these appendages define you as a human being, you can still be Answa without your legs.

Lets do it this way Answa. How about a human kept alive on a machine with no brain? They take his brain out put in in a jar and keep the body alive?

How bout those vegetables you always hear about with no chance of survival or recovery without machines?

How about one born with no eyes, ears, mouth, or hands? How about that one?

Again, what am I killing every day?

Nevermind already dude.

It's not a dream world, it's hope. You know, the word I've repeated countless times. You have to have hope. If you don't actually pull through, you tried. Giving up before you even start is never the way to do anything.

Hope is good. The thing you have to remember here is that decisions are being made that will affect people for a long time to come. You can't make decisions like that based on hope. You can't condemn innocent people to insane laws based simply on hope, you need certainty.

A horse isn't a human being, don't compare a human to any animal, because they're not the same. I'm not talking about superiority, since a dog is not a horse, either. They're incomparable except in that you can say that they're quadrupeds, mammals, and vertebrates.

Get off your high horse.

Why would they lose the argument?

Because once you say human, you start to get into the argument on if a zygote is or is not a human being and should have human rights. And you'll lose that argument.

 

[Darkdante]

I'm over it. Arguing with you is like watching a bunch of retards trying to Fuck a Doorknob.

He's like the scarecrow in the wizard of Oz.

I wish I had a brain..............

:lol:

 

[Darkdante]

I kept on trying to look for a picture that made me think of you but you know what Raivyn?

Its Impossible!

There aint people that look stupid enough online to match up my view of you.

So I settled for this.

Enjoy. 8)

 

[Trippyhippy]

That's a bit offsides isn't it?

 

[Galaika]

I am pro choice and I dont want to get drawn into this mess, but I do have a couple of questions I'd like to ask all the people who are against abortion:

1. Do you think it is right for a child to have to be born into a bad situation because of contraception failure. (ie. Poor single parent wthout the means, teenager incapable of looking after a child, no loving secure family)

2. Do you think it is right for a rape victim to have to suffer the horror of having to give birth to the child of their assaulter, and then that child to later find out the means of their conception?

3. Why do the 'rights' of an undeveloped proto-human without consciousness (of course I do not condone the abortion of a foetus grown to a stage where it is conscious) outweigh the rights of the living mother and/or father?

(I possibly think the last question is badly worded and you could argue the right to life of the foetus is greater than the rights lost by the parents. But if you consider it with the first question, the situation that the parents and child are put in after birth, such as the economic hardships of having to raise another child, I believe the rights lost by the parents hold weight)

 

[Raivyn]

A lot of things that make no sense to anyone but him.

I was going to quote your post and respond to each individual bit, but I decided I'd be wasting my time.

Really now? Gee why don't you just say "I am ignoring you based on the assumption that you are a conservative, and in actuality I have no idea what I am talking about".

If my posts don't make sense to you then you need to get a dictionary and a thesaurus.

(*)You can't see my point because you don't want to.

(*)You put words in my mouth, you draw conclusions from nowhere, you insist I'm trying to call you stupid.

(*)You use words that don't fit the context of what you are trying to say.

You know, these sound an awful lot like the arguments I am pressing to you and supporting with evidence, oh wait - they are! The difference between you and I is that I am including evidence and making factual statements as well as responding directly to you and not bullshitting you.

Each and every one of those statements you just made is completely false. You also offer no evidence to the contrary. I have been asking you for evidence supporting anything you've been saying for the past 3 pages and where is it? Nowhere. You don't have any. Still think you are wasting YOUR time? How dare you think I am stupid enough to fall for your lame explanation of anything.

if your whole counterpoint to anything I have to say is "I'm going to quit trying because I don't have a leg to stand on in this argument," then don't ever enter the argument in the first place, especially with no point whatsoever.

And another thing.

Also as a point of reference; aligning yourself with and defending someone who time and time again proves their own ignorance so efficiently and succinctly that he effectively mops the floor with himself is never a good tactic. Nor is agreeing with his blatant use of unsubstantiated name calling. What do they call that all the time, a pro-tip?

What the hell are you talking about? I aligned myself with noone. I am giving you my views and my views alone. I defended noone. If anything, I made a Stab at Darkdante by telling him he needs to quit calling people names and calm down.
I see why he's so angry now.

You must excuse Darkdante, he is very easily angered by ignorance. ... I see why he is always callin you a doody head ... I see why he's so angry now

bold point 1 = support + defense.
bold point 2 = identification/agreement
bold point 3 = identification/agreement

You were saying?

And you certainly didn't ever tell dante to quit calling people names and calm down unless you did it in a pm - which is an oh so handy claim.

You put words in my mouth, you draw conclusions from nowhere, you insist I'm trying to call you stupid.

The conclusions and words that I 'put in your mouth' and 'draw from nowhere' are coming directly from your posts. Take a look.

quote="Trippyhippy"]You must excuse Darkdante, he is very easily angered by ignorance

Just because you don't see my point doesen't mean I'm going nowhere with my arugement. It just means you can't comprehend the things I'm saying. Too bad, you might learn something if you understood me.

Conservatives aren't allowed to speak to me concerning blind ideaology. That is what being consrvative is all about ... Ignorance in its purest form.

This last one is the best;

I'm over it. Arguing with you is like watching a bunch of retards trying to Fuck a Doorknob.

Oh wow - you sure aren't trying to demean my intelligence are you? Dude what kind of acid-induced technicolor dreamworld are you living in? Obviously one where the river of hypocrisy and self-contradiction flowing from your mouth makes any sort of sense.

Way to go champ :roll:

 

[Raivyn]

I kept on trying to look for a picture that made me think of you but you know what Raivyn?

Its Impossible!

There aint people that look stupid enough online to match up my view of you.

So I settled for this.

Enjoy. 8)

Oh dante! How clever! Did you stay up all night trying to think of which insult I hurled at you to try to mirror back at me? I hope you didn't lose any sleep over this. :roll: